Indians, guts? That’s new. I thought Chinese and Indian males were emasculated.
You haven’t disproven that. Moreover, you have yet to provide a link to your stats.
Please do so.
Considering the population numbers of India and China it’s pretty obvious that they’re not.
Here is one reason:
Cochran, Harpending & Henry’s full paper [here](http:// harpending.humanevo.utah.edu/Documents/ashkiq.webpub.pdf).
Bizarre, irrelevant, and racist (or abjectly failed sarcasm). Next?
Ashkenazi Jews are just Kazakhs with European blood who adhere to Judaism, just like Chinese Americans and Indian Americans are subgroups within a larger group.
If you’d care to respond without resorting to racist stereotypes, please do so.
Not to mention I know plenty of really good women engineers from these places.
You misspelled Khazars, you’re claim regarding Ashenazi Jews is wrong, and even if it were correct it would be irrelevant to the racist post that preceded it.
If you wish your arguments to be taken seriously, I’d recommend you stop being racist and make better thought out posts.
So apart from the fact that modern Jews aren’t descended from the Khazars, income does not equal IQ, and the claims about income still haven’t been linked to a cite, yah, great job there.
Sorry. This nonsense was debunked, years ago. Koestler made a few intersting conjectures*, (although he pretty much ignored all of known history to do so), but both actual history and current DNA research have long proved him wrong. The Kazakh nobility did convert to Judaism, in large part. However, they were never a numerous people and when they were overrun, they dispersed into the Balkans and up the Danube. Koestler wanted them to have then moved up the Dneiper, (and, oddly, the Volga), to Russia, but there is no record that they did. On the other hand, we have a lot of historical records indicating that the Ashkenazim were traders of Northern Europe who moved Eastward from regions in Germany, (at about the same time that the Teutonic knights were moving into what became Prussia).
More recently, DNA analysis has demonstrated that the Ashkenazim are clearly descended from the same stock as the Sephardic and Mizrahi Jews, not from any Slavic groups who might have lived near Crimea.
- (And while Koestler was simply a dilletante who wanted to sell some books, the old, defunct melvig.org web site, (the domain of which has long since been taken over by a porn site), was nothing but a bunch of racist nutters who fabricated pretty much everything they posted.)
Culture
Oops, totally forgot the last part of the post which may be almost as foolish as the first part.
Exactly how are Chinese Americans and Indian Americans genetically distinct from mainland Chinese and Mainland Indians?
Our main rule here is “Don’t be a jerk.” This counts as being a jerk and makes a very bad first impression. Don’t do it again.
Lower-caste Indians are genetically distinct from upper and middle-caste Indians. Just look at their faces. They seem to belong to a different race. Even if Ashekenazi Jews aren’t Khazars, it still doesn’t refute the fact they come from the Eastern part of Eurasia.
In the last Intel STS, the Chinese Americans were overrepresented by 7200%. They outnumbered Whites in the finals. I doubt some guy would use this in order to claim that Chinese Americans have 72 times more geniuses than Whites. Same can be said about the overrepresentation of Jews among the Nobel Prize recipients.
Are you just throwing shit at the wall in the hopes that some will stick?
Yet again, a citation for your income study.
Then, an analysis of what predictive and/or analytical power income has to do with IQ.
Then some sort of connection to your comments about Khazars/“Eastern… Eurasia”.
Please state exactly what your statistical argument is.
Because when a group which makes up a tiny percent of the population at large fills 25% of the freely selected spots for an award, it’s evident that something other than pure random chance is at work. While IQ is not a likely measure, as we’ve discussed at length, that doesn’t mean that your method of… analysis… is cogent.
Read the Harpending paper I linked. It discusses how this could arise.
Are you trying to argue that American Indians are Upper-caste while those living in India are Lower-caste?
If so, please provide a link to prove that.
No, that’s not true. There are many light-skinned Low-caste Hindus and many High-caste Hindus.
Additionally, many are Muslims. In fact more Muslims live in India than in the entire Arab world.
Finally, please, for the millionth time, provide a link to your claims about the income of various ethnic groups in the US.
Simply not true. As I already noted, DNA has already established that Ashkenazim are of the same stock as other Jews–all originating in the far West of Asia at the East end of the Mediterranean Sea, not in the “Eastern” part of Eurasia, and more closely related to other Middle Eastern peoples than to other groups.
The Eastern part of Eurasia is China.