# Why are the late deciding Republicans going for Rubio?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-the-late-deciding-republicans-going-for-rubio/746687>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [February 21, 2016, 1:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-the-late-deciding-republicans-going-for-rubio/746687 "2016-02-21T13:18:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FlikTheBlue](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fliktheblue/32/10972_2.png) [@FlikTheBlue](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FlikTheBlue)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2016, 1:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-the-late-deciding-republicans-going-for-rubio/746687/1 "2016-02-21T13:18:00Z")

</div>

Exit polling in Iowa and South Carolina found that Republicans who decided within the last few days tended to go for Rubio. I’d like to get opinions as to why you think this may be the case. Here are some of my guesses.

1. The media is pushing a narrative favoring Rubio over the other Republicans, especially Trump and Cruz. People less engaged in the process might not really think about their decision until a few days before the election. They then see media coverage favorable to Rubio and shift his way.

2. Late deciders in the Republican race this year may be people who in the past supported the mainstream candidate, i.e. a typical McCain or Romney voter. They didn’t see anyone to their liking, with Bush hobbled by his name and being low energy. They finally held their noses and voted for Rubio because they don’t want Trump or Cruz to win the nomination.

Any other thought on this phenomenon?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zeldar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/b77776/32.png) [@Zeldar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zeldar)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2016, 2:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-the-late-deciding-republicans-going-for-rubio/746687/2 "2016-02-21T14:01:02Z")

</div>

Just a guess here: Option 2.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dalej42](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/67e7ee/32.png) [@dalej42](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dalej42)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2016, 2:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-the-late-deciding-republicans-going-for-rubio/746687/3 "2016-02-21T14:01:38Z")

</div>

There’s also the ‘least bad’ factor. You’re either with Trump or against him, same as Cruz. Carson has his own niche. Thus you’re debating between Bush/Kasich/Rubio. Bush never caught fire in Iowa or South Carolina and Kasich had written off both states.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![astorian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ad7895/32.png) [@astorian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/astorian)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2016, 5:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-the-late-deciding-republicans-going-for-rubio/746687/4 "2016-02-21T17:11:52Z")

</div>

Option 2 is the closest explanation.

I like Rubio and already voted for him in the Texas primary. But he wasn’t many people’s first choice. He’s the last viable choice for Republicans who can’t stand the thought of Trump or Cruz winning.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2016, 7:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-the-late-deciding-republicans-going-for-rubio/746687/5 "2016-02-21T19:31:17Z")

</div>

I think it’s easy to understand why _Trump_ didn’t get the late deciders. His supporters are caught up in strong, mostly irrational, emotions. There weren’t a lot of studious Republicans carefully deliberating whether to stay calm or to vote for the berserker.

Similar comments may apply to supporters of the fanatic Cruz.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2016, 10:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-the-late-deciding-republicans-going-for-rubio/746687/6 "2016-02-21T22:39:42Z")

</div>

And didn’t Bush concede before voting closed? At least some of Rubio’s late-deciders would be people who originally planned to vote for Bush, and shifted to their second choice when he dropped out.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peremensoe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ce7236/32.png) [@Peremensoe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peremensoe)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2016, 10:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-the-late-deciding-republicans-going-for-rubio/746687/7 "2016-02-21T22:49:13Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> And didn’t Bush concede before voting closed?

No. Bush did not appear until well after all polling places were closed and the rough shape of the standings was known.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Locrian](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/locrian/32/14146_2.png) [@Locrian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Locrian)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2016, 10:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-the-late-deciding-republicans-going-for-rubio/746687/8 "2016-02-21T22:56:21Z")

</div>

Option #2 makes sense to me. Unless a hypothetical option #3 - Bloomberg is taking too long, so Rubio.
