Only a few were moderated, the rest allowed even though they are direct personal attacks simply because the moderators support these attacks. They are using their personal beliefs to bias their moderation as they believe AGW skeptics to be deniers and supports or creationism or conspiracy theories. Regardless some were directly ignored and not moderated and excuses used to justify it. My point about ignoring them is how they presented the argument, they do so in the context as if I was all me and the ones whom they let personally attack me did nothing wrong.
Try reading the thread and you can clearly see it was those responding to me who wanted to fight.
I like my mittens. They are a hug for my fingers.
I think you’re right. I misread. In my defense, though, I gave up trying to parse his word usage two threads ago.
Well there’s your problem … moderator mittens. :dubious:
(Unless you mean these? :eek:)
CMC fnord!
I think it’s great that Soulfrost is still trying to make sense of this. Keep it up, dude.
I think you mean “My cat’s breath smells like catfood.”
Or maybe When come back bring pie.
Great sentence. “As if I was all me”, indeed. Can we all just agree not to suggest in future that Poptech is all him?
BTW, Poptech, have you tried decaffeinated?
Hey! Why should I read that thread? I didn’t do anything wrong. :eek:
That could be a useful thought for mods though, “No warning issued, if you read this thread in atonement. Or say ten Hail Mary’s, same difference.”
Do you have a tapeworm?
Too much Redbull = many typos. I need a 24 hour edit timer.
Suddenly this thread makes a lot more sense.
[John Hurt] (The Elephant Man)
Fixed your coding.
From Merriam-Webster:
Your thread was neither suppressed nor deleted, nor was any part of it. It was not censored. It was merely moved.
Loonies never debate each other. They might make a dismissive comment here and there (like Poptech did with the 9/11 CT stuff) to make themselves seem normal, but they never get into a real discussion with each other about their respective flavours of loonitude.
Well, saying that your thread was censored would be one, but I imagine you meant a piece of misinformation you posted in the original thread, and not one that you posted in this thread.
It was suppressed and deleted (censored) from the Great Debates forum.
Please explain how I am a “loony”.
You’re adding a qualification which is not included in the definition. The definition does not specify “…from the Great Debates forum.”
Help! Help! I’m being suppressed! Come and see the violence inherent in the system!