# Why are threads like this in GD not shut down or moved to IMHO?

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-threads-like-this-in-gd-not-shut-down-or-moved-to-imho/747273
**Category:** About This Message Board
**Created:** [February 27, 2016, 5:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-threads-like-this-in-gd-not-shut-down-or-moved-to-imho/747273 "2016-02-27T05:57:47Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)
#### Post date: [February 28, 2016, 12:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-threads-like-this-in-gd-not-shut-down-or-moved-to-imho/747273/4 "2016-02-28T00:29:42Z")

</div>

> [@Irishman](#):
>
> Not a mod, but IMO, there is a valid debatable question in there.  
> …  
> Of course, the posters in that thread can take it to debate territory by reframing the issues, advocating one or the other position. I haven’t read the whole thread yet, just the first few posts, but I probably will.

Oh, you should read it. There’s some very valuable debate going on there:

> [@Scott Adams says... (Hillary & feminism)](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scott-adams-says-hillary-feminism/747187/47):
>
> If a Hillary want the voters to vote for her on account of her pussy, the least she could do was to put out. Like Hillary could promise she’d institute a national lottery, and let, say, 10,000 random winners fuck her over the course of her presidency. That way the voters could get some actual benefit from having pussy in the White House, rather than just a person.

I’m not sure I can blame the OP for that, but I’m not sure I can’t, either.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-are-threads-like-this-in-gd-not-shut-down-or-moved-to-imho/747273)._
