Why are young black men in the US 21X more likely to be killed by police than young white men?

That was a given.

I don’t think so. Horton committed those murders in April 1987 and was sentenced to life in prison six months later. National Republicans don’t seem to have become aware of the issue at all until the next year.

Not to the same extent, no. It just wouldn’t have been as effective.

Yes, I know the drill: racism can only be acknowledged if it’s so incredibly obvious and explicit that it rules out every single other factor. And if it’s 1:41 pm on a Tuesday in spring and Mercury is in retrograde and the wind is blowing from the Northeast at 5 to 7 knots.

Criminals are not black “more often than not.” This is the end result, and in many cases the intended result, of the arguments being used elsewhere in this thread: people say black people are more likely than white people to commit some types of crime, which is not really true (it’s more accurate to say that people convicted of those crimes are more likely to be black) and this gets boiled down and misunderstood as “most criminals are black.” And then that misunderstanding is used to justify illegal or improper behavior by police or racist attitudes. It does not work that way.

So that’s the legal system: the police will do things that are wrong, but the burden is on everyone else to change their behavior. We can’t expect the police to do things differently.

How about “most murderers are black”? Or “most robbers are black”? Is that “misunderstood” or is it a fact?

Why are you asking questions about a different claim?

Just wondering if you think those statements come from “misunderstanding”? What if such statements come from people who haven’t looked at the statistics?

Who cares? The relevant point is that dude77 has provided a nice little illustration of how people take the irrelevant piece of data you keep repeating - ‘black people are disproportionately convicted of some crimes’ - and then get the facts completely wrong by saying a majority of criminals are black. This then justifies the police being more likely to hurt or kill black people.

Well, I read somewhere that black kids are 21 times more likely than white kids to be shot and killed by the police.

I’m taking the police officer’s pov for a minute … set aside the data and statistics …

as I said, if I’m a police officer and I’m constantly having run ins with perps and they all happen to be gangster looking blacks … guess what ? … I’m going to become wary of all these gangster looking blacks … same goes if another group of people are involved … cops aren’t robots … they’re human

Ignore the facts. I sure didn’t see that one coming.

But they aren’t. I understand that people generalize from experience. Do you understand that if you base your comments on a premise that is totally wrong, your argument will also be totally wrong?

what does this even mean ? … are police officers supposed to just ignore their own experiences out in the streets and guide themselves by ‘statistics’ ? surely that’s not what you’re suggesting

what is wrong about my point ?

I’m saying it’s appealing to stereotypes (and racism) – it’s a racist stereotype to suggest that black people chosen for jobs over white people have inferior qualifications and only got the job because of affirmative action.

It was great politics at the time. This tactic won many elections for Republicans (and for Democrats before them).

You suggested that all the perps are “gangster looking blacks”. This isn’t true anywhere in the US.

When the vast majority of black people are not criminals and are not violent, it’s not reasonable to treat black people as if they are. Further, treating people like criminals makes people more likely to be criminals. If a kid sees police treat his dad like crap, when his dad did nothing wrong, that kid will be just a little more likely to be resentful of the police and do bad things as an adult. By treating black people differently, for those cops who do so, they are making the problem way, way worse.

Yes, what are statistics except collected facts that are open to evaluation and correction that we can use to better understand the world around us? Surely the unscientific impressions of a person that are not backed by data are more reliable.

Wait - I just realized that’s absolutely fucking crazy.

No, I don’t think the police need to entirely discount their experience on the job. That would be impossible anyway. I also don’t think they should be entirely guided by their impressions. People’s minds are just too vulnerable to all manner of biases. Our brains are designed to generalize based on very little information, so while they sometimes make correct associations, they often make incorrect ones. If a police officer is shot by a guy wearing a green shirt, the next time he sees a person with a green shirt he might be quick on the trigger even though the green shirt is an irrelevant detail. People should not die as a result of those kinds of generalizations. People should not be harassed, arrested, or imprisoned as a result of those kinds of generalizations.

Most criminals are not black. I don’t know how to make this any more plain.

By definition, one who benefits from affirmative action is 1) a minority and 2) has qualifications that are inferior to others who he or she bumped.

You’ve posted anti-affirmative action boilerplate without actually responding to what iiandyiii wrote. This thread is positively lousy with people doing that kind of thing.

I realize I mentioned ‘all perps’ in one post … but why didn’t you notice the other post where I stated ‘more often times than not’ ? lol I mean the latter obviously …

you make a good point about children seeing their parents interactions with police and having that affect them … it’s a bad cycle

aren’t the majority of violent crimes in the U.S. committed by blacks ?

They’re both wrong.

NO.

I think that there is much room for improvement for police departments as far as their interactions with citizens … the police have a problem treating ALL types of people … not just blacks … but there’s also much improvement needed as far as black crime … the problem is no one wants to discuss that because it is ‘taboo’ to do so, it’s only discussed when people are putting the blame on everyone else but where it is coming from

LOL. We’ve had at least four posters in this thread insist that that’s the only thing they will discuss.

I’m not talking about this thread … I’m talking in general … you can’t have any honest discussion about it because it just becomes a game of deflection and calling people ‘racist’ or implying that they are

This is just bull. Our society in general would much rather list all the failings of black people as a whole than talk about the problems with the way the police treat black people, the way the justice system hurts them, and so on. We’ve seen exactly that dynamic play out in the aftermath of the Trayvon Martin shooting, the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, and on and on. It’s always the same chorus - thug attitudes, violent crime, where are the fathers, culture of dependency, blah blah blah.