# Why can't we predict earthquakes?

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-cant-we-predict-earthquakes/284300
**Category:** Factual Questions
**Created:** [January 12, 2005, 12:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-cant-we-predict-earthquakes/284300 "2005-01-12T00:50:54Z")
**Posts on this page:** 6
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Eve](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/9e8a1a/32.png) [@Eve](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Eve)
#### Post date: [January 12, 2005, 12:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-cant-we-predict-earthquakes/284300/1 "2005-01-12T00:50:54Z")

</div>

We know where the tectonic plates and major fault lines are, right? And we obviously have sensors so that _after_ an earthquake happens, we can tell the survivors, “Yep, that was an 8.5. Quite a shake-up, huh, folks?”

Isn’t there any way to feel build-up or pre-tremors or anything so we can tell people “Run for the hills!” or “Run away from the hills!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)
#### Post date: [January 12, 2005, 12:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-cant-we-predict-earthquakes/284300/2 "2005-01-12T00:57:48Z")

</div>

Well, we _can_ predict earthquakes, but not usually on a time scale that will do anyone any good. We know certain sections of the San Andreas fault are way overdue to slip, but we can’t tell exactly when it’s going to happen. Plate movements happen on a scale of decades and centuries, so that trying to refine a prediction down to a scale of a day and hour is virtually impossible.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Punoqllads](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/d2c977/32.png) [@Punoqllads](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Punoqllads)
#### Post date: [January 12, 2005, 1:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-cant-we-predict-earthquakes/284300/3 "2005-01-12T01:01:48Z")

</div>

We can detect that the likelyhood of earthquakes is high or low, or getting higher or getting lower, if we have thrown enough hardware at the problem. Witness the somewhat-recent noises about Mt. St. Helens. But how much money has been spent on the monitoring equipment and the monitoring staff?

Regarless of the technology, though, the certainty that something will occur is inversely proportional to the amount of time that you can do anything about it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![galt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/35a633/32.png) [@galt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/galt)
#### Post date: [January 12, 2005, 1:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-cant-we-predict-earthquakes/284300/4 "2005-01-12T01:10:00Z")

</div>

Earthquake’s comin’. You heard it here first.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Tapioca\_Dextrin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Tapioca\_Dextrin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tapioca_Dextrin)
#### Post date: [January 12, 2005, 1:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-cant-we-predict-earthquakes/284300/5 "2005-01-12T01:22:16Z")

</div>

> [@Eve](#):
>
> Isn’t there any way to feel build-up or pre-tremors or anything

Basically, the answer is no, at least as far as anyone knows. From [here](http://scec.ess.ucla.edu/%7Eykagan/perspective.html)

> [@](#):
>
> Whether any particular small earthquake grows into a large earthquake depends on a myriad of fine details of physical conditions throughout a large volume, not just in the immediate vicinity of the fault. This highly sensitive nonlinear dependence of earthquake rupture on unknown initial conditions severely limits predictability.

Translated into normal speak, sometimes the ground rocks and rolls before the big one, sometimes not. Sometimes it rocks and rolls and nothing happens.

The [USGS](http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/research/parkfield/index.html) has is running a long term experiment in California to try and understand the physics underlying earthquakes, but don’t expect any giant breakthroughs for the next couple of decades.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Zebra](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/c0e974/32.png) [@Zebra](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zebra)
#### Post date: [January 12, 2005, 1:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-cant-we-predict-earthquakes/284300/6 "2005-01-12T01:49:16Z")

</div>

On the bright side, predicting the weather a hundred years ago was not nearly as good as today and 50 years ago giving advance warning of a tornado was just a dream.

Today, we are much better at it.

I feel confident that in the future quakes and volcanos will be predicted. At first maybe only with a few months but I’m positive that it will get better.
