Why did the buffalo just not go away?

That link launched some malware ‘my computer scan’ thing.

So my understanding of this thread is that either commodore or Klomodo or Komodo dragons kill buffalo, and clack people sell crack. It’s a strange world.

Er… the same way as any other instinct? Individuals who kept drinking the water after a crocodile killed their brother are more likely to pass on their genes than individuals who scamper off into the desert?

There were several species of bison in North America, but only one was left by 1492 (two if you count the “forest bison” as a separate species from the plains bison).

There were all sorts of large animal species in North America that didn’t survive the end of the ice age, which also coincided with the introduction of humans. The notion that the Americas were some sort of pristine untouched wilderness is a fiction.

maybe you need some spleep.

Nice idea, except for the fact that group selection isn’t an evolutionary mechanism, and hasn’t been considered as such for quite some time…

Doesn’t work that way either, since genes don’t have survival strategies. Some selection occurs at the level of “gene”, but a good deal more occurs at the level of “individual”.

Maybe Clamato dragons?

I did a claymation film of the Clamato Dragons on my Commodore 64.

As I stated above, it seems that the evolution of this behavior can be explained in terms of individual selection.

You mean a Komododore 64.

I’m not saying anything about the nature doc in question, but I was shocked to learn that there were staged scenes in Winged Migration, which was a super high budget theatrically released bird documentary. Specifically, the bird trapped in oil.

This set of documentaries, and Planet Earth before it, is actually pretty cool about showing a 10 minute bit at the end that shows how one segment was filmed. In this episode, it was the Komodo Dragon segment, so I would really doubt it was staged.

I was ready to nitpick it when I heard Oprah say it in the show (in the US they threw out Attenborough’s narration in favor of that well-known nature expert :rolleyes:). I had always heard that the KD depended on the vile bacteria in its bite to infect its prey then just wait it out until it died of infection. But when I looked it up I was surprised to see that it was found to be venomous.

On spelling: It’s amusing to see that Google Spell Check doesn’t recognize Komodo and renders it variously as kimono and commode, among others.:slight_smile:

In the first episode, when they showed the 3 cheetahs hunting together, they said something to the effect that this was some new behavior that had never been documented before. If I am not mistaken, and someone correct me please, this is pretty common behavior for siblings when they first leave the care of their mothers.

But the filming was great. Nice show to watch, but don’t believe everything you hear on it.

(my bolding)

WTF? They used Oprah to narrate it? It was bad enough having Sigourney Weaver narrate “Planet Earth”, but Oprah?

I thought the segment covered the Komodo Dragon’s issues pretty well. They don’t kill their prey quickly because they don’t have to. The prey is usually confined to the island. The Komodo can smell and track sick, dying, dead prey from miles away so there’s no reason to actively pursue their prey once it is bitten. I wouldn’t be surprised to find out that the smell of the victim’s blood and the Dragon’s venom triggers them into a stalking behavior.

The buffalo is usually not solitary and is probably stubborn and somewhat stupid when it finds itself in a situation where it is singled out. It probably assumed it could defend itself against a short flat attacker and after being bitten it still didn’t comprehend that the dragon was more than a nuisance. In the film footage the buffalo acted like it was driven off and not necessarily trying to escape for its life.

Yes, Oprah. It has come to that.

Slight nitpick: IIRC, Komodo dragons do not actually secrete venom like a poisonous snake; rather, their mouths are so septic (rotting shreds of meat stuck between their teeth) that their bite is effectively poisonous. An effective strategy for a slow-metabolism hunter/scavenger, whose prey has nowhere to run to, and can afford to wait days or weeks for it’s prey to die.

This has recently been disputed. From wikipedia:

I watched that episode last night, and the narration (yes, Oprah - not Sir David, dang it) pretty much explained just that.

The segment explained that the Komodo is typically a carrion eater, not a full time hunter and takes a low risk approach when it hunts. It went on to say that buffalo didn’t recognize the dragon as a serious threat - it was just an annoyance, nipping at its heels. (It does not appear that the Asian buffalo evolved side by side with the komodo and would not instinctively avoid the toxic/poisonous bite.)