# Why do apartment dwellers have to pay additional rent for indoor pets?

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378
**Category:** Factual Questions
**Created:** [August 10, 2018, 4:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378 "2018-08-10T04:42:23Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![dalej42](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/67e7ee/32.png) [@dalej42](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dalej42)
#### Post date: [August 12, 2018, 8:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378/61 "2018-08-12T20:41:44Z")

</div>

> [@RivkahChaya](#):
>
> 800? I pay less than that for a fairly large two bedroom with a walk-in closet and a full kitchen, not an efficiency-- and that includes the pet rent I pay, plus the charge for my covered parking space. It’s a secure building, too, which is to say, it has its own security. It’s not in the most desirable part of town, but it’s not in the worst, either. Indianapolis has a huge gap between the two.

$800 for a two bedroom, wow! I pay $1750 for a 520 sq ft studio in Chicago. It is a nice building, and the bedroom area is slightly separate. I think parking is abou $200 a month, but I don’t drive.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![RivkahChaya](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rivkahchaya/32/8919_2.png) [@RivkahChaya](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RivkahChaya)
#### Post date: [August 12, 2018, 9:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378/62 "2018-08-12T21:45:39Z")

</div>

> [@dalej42](#):
>
> $800 for a two bedroom, wow! I pay $1750 for a 520 sq ft studio in Chicago. It is a nice building, and the bedroom area is slightly separate. I think parking is abou $200 a month, but I don’t drive.

Yeah, in Chicago. The post I was responding to was talking about College Station. That sounded high for a college town. Granted, I’ve never lived in College Station, or anywhere in Texas.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Xema](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/9de053/32.png) [@Xema](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Xema)
#### Post date: [August 13, 2018, 1:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378/63 "2018-08-13T01:34:25Z")

</div>

> [@RivkahChaya](#):
>
> I get that maybe your relatives were not the most responsible pet owners, but not everyone is like that.

Right.

But enough pet owners are irresponsible enough to sufficiently taint the entire group. Landlords thus know they are better off preferring to rent to people without pets. And, accordingly, that it’s sensible to apply a surcharge to pet owners.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)
#### Post date: [August 13, 2018, 2:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378/64 "2018-08-13T02:09:58Z")

</div>

> [@Xema](#):
>
> Right.
> 
> But enough pet owners are irresponsible enough to sufficiently taint the entire group. Landlords thus know they are better off preferring to rent to people without pets. And, accordingly, that it’s sensible to apply a surcharge to pet owners.

Ask your landlord friends which they would rather rent to, tenants with pets or tenants with kids. In my state, you cannot turn down a prospective tenant just because they have children. Better to grab the tenants with pets while they can.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)
#### Post date: [August 13, 2018, 2:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378/65 "2018-08-13T02:38:49Z")

</div>

> [@SamuelA](#):
>
> I’m one of those guys. I have 2 cats. Well, 3 right now because one of the kitties is a loaner from my girlfriend. And while the apartment only has carpet in the bedrooms, I know the cats have peed on them in a few different places. It doesn’t smell because I use enzyme spray but what the heck. 2 cats cost 30 a month in pet rent.
> 
> I know after I leave, which might be as soon as a year after I moved in, they will need to replace the bedroom carpet. It’s about 400 square feet, at $1 a square foot for installed cut rate discount carpet, that’s $400. And actually it’s a 2 bedroom apartment and the cats have peed in there as well. A lot more in there, actually. It doesn’t smell because I ran a carpet cleaning machine on it and my roommate knows to close the door. Still, it looks like these cats have done probably $400-$800 of damage, or about what the landlord is charging for a year.

> [@SamuelA](#):
>
> One isn’t spayed. Haven’t had time. The urine may or may not have reached the pad. Also the way I see it, since I am being forced to pay so much, I am not really feeling too bad about it. Every time I see them clawing the carpet or blinds or I have to spray something on the pee spot I see it as getting my money’s worth.
> 
> I have been planning to get the female cat fixed and then have her live outside if she keeps peeing outside her box though.

This is exactly why. Cat pee has ammonia in it and can get into the carpet and floor, and the scent can really linger. I cannot BELIEVE how irresponsible this is, not to mention not spaying your poor cat. YOU may not smell it, but I’ll be blunt: pet owners like you ruin it for everyone else.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![sabernode](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/278dde/32.png) [@sabernode](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sabernode)
#### Post date: [August 13, 2018, 2:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378/66 "2018-08-13T02:52:26Z")

</div>

> [@nelliebly](#):
>
> I’m not a pet owner (any longer), but every apartment building and complex I know of that allows pets charges additional rent per pet. I well understand an additional _deposit_ to cover possible additional wear and tearnt, but what’s the reasoning behind additional rent? My neighbor pays an additional $60 a month for her two indoor cats. That’s $7200 a year. They don’t use gym equipment or get their own parking spaces. Heck, kids cause a lot of wear and tear, yet no landlord I know of charges an additional monthly rent for kids.

I’ve got no idea about adding pet charges in renting an apartment. I only know some hotels that we’ve been charged a minimal amount for a dog we are brought in. But some are refundable if there no damages upon checking out. Precisely, they are charging for those reasons.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Nava](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/da6949/32.png) [@Nava](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nava)
#### Post date: [August 13, 2018, 4:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378/67 "2018-08-13T04:52:16Z")

</div>

> [@Musicat](#):
>
> How many apartments have you seen that have crayon marks and finger paints on the walls from cats?

None, but I’ve also seen none which had those from children in an area bigger than about half a square meter. And many parents who make a point of specifically teaching the kid “this one is the painting wall” (nowadays you can even use drawable, washable paint).

And the marks aren’t structural; a layer of paint (which in many locations is even required by law in between tenants, although the incoming may choose to forego it) will solve it. The sliced-up, curling-up wood not so much.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![SamuelA](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c77e96/32.png) [@SamuelA](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SamuelA)
#### Post date: [August 13, 2018, 6:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378/68 "2018-08-13T06:43:13Z")

</div>

> [@Guinastasia](#):
>
> This is exactly why. Cat pee has ammonia in it and can get into the carpet and floor, and the scent can really linger. I cannot BELIEVE how irresponsible this is, not to mention not spaying your poor cat. YOU may not smell it, but I’ll be blunt: pet owners like you ruin it for everyone else.

And I don’t feel the slightest amount of guilt. I’ve been charged $800 for the privilege, and I’d feel ripped off if my pets didn’t do some damage. I clean their litter box consistently and have tried to train the one that pees not to do it, but what can I do.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![watchwolf49](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/e9c0ed/32.png) [@watchwolf49](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/watchwolf49)
#### Post date: [August 13, 2018, 2:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378/69 "2018-08-13T14:08:46Z")

</div>

> [@SamuelA](#):
>
> It’s expensive to do a nationwide search. Yeah, if they sued your landlord down the street using the same local courts, sure. You can find out. But if it’s a different state, harder.

True … but remember the context: we have five years solid rental history, five years solid employment history and most states allow a screening fee to cover the cost of running a credit report … rare for a perspective tenant to shoe-horn a felony conviction in all this … anything from before, the individual will have successfully completed probation or they won’t be “out-of-state” …

I’ve only had one tenant arrested out from underneath me … I chased him down the day after his release, handed him the keys to an empty unit and told him to come by the rental office in a few days to sign contracts … the man was God’s gift to landlords, it was just Child Support Enforcement who hated on him …

=====

It’s much easier and safer for a landlord to spread the costs of bad pet owners across all the tenants … it doesn’t take long for a dog to chew his way through a bedroom door or scratch his way through the sub-floor … charging the individual these costs is subject to judicial review … pffffft … better to charge everybody because more often than not the landlord won’t have bad pet owners … [ka’ching] …

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Haldurson](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/51bf81/32.png) [@Haldurson](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Haldurson)
#### Post date: [August 13, 2018, 10:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378/70 "2018-08-13T22:28:47Z")

</div>

Cost of wear and tear beyond normal wear and tear generally gets put into the deposit. So what would make more sense would be to require a larger deposit for pet owners. One of the biggest problems with pets is not the physical damage, but that pet owners will often leave their pet home alone during the day while they are out. This is less of a problem with unattached apartments (which we have in some more expensive communities around here). The last thing a landlord wants is for the neighbors calling the cops with noise complaints all the time because your pet misses their owner.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![nearwildheaven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/90db22/32.png) [@nearwildheaven](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/nearwildheaven)
#### Post date: [August 13, 2018, 11:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378/71 "2018-08-13T23:02:31Z")

</div>

There is one situation where a landlord can deny people with children, because of the children, and that’s because many places have limits on how many people can live in a place with A number of bedrooms or B square footage.

There’s a higher-end apartment building in the city where I went to college, within walking distance of campus, that has units up to 5 bedrooms. To prevent situations like, for instance, 15 people or multiple families sharing the rent, they have an occupancy limit of number of bedrooms plus one; AFAIK this applies to everyone, not just unrelated people. The 5BR units rent for about $3,000 a month, and have 3 or 4 bathrooms.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Gatopescado](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gatopescado/32/5711_2.png) [@Gatopescado](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gatopescado)
#### Post date: [August 13, 2018, 11:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378/72 "2018-08-13T23:52:31Z")

</div>

I own my own home and don’t let those dirty bastards in the “house” part. They have their own room off the laundry room. My house is filthy enough without Weiner Dog hair everywhere.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Quartz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quartz/32/267_2.png) [@Quartz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quartz)
#### Post date: [August 14, 2018, 10:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378/73 "2018-08-14T10:12:30Z")

</div>

Landlord checking in - I let out my old house. Pets are a particular problem due to allergies. I am allergic to cats, for instance. So if a tenant were to have a pet, the place would need a much more thorough cleaning than normal before the next tenant moves in. Perhaps even new carpets. That has to be funded somehow.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![iamthewalrus\_3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/258eb7/32.png) [@iamthewalrus\_3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iamthewalrus_3)
#### Post date: [August 14, 2018, 6:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378/74 "2018-08-14T18:29:41Z")

</div>

> [@SamuelA](#):
>
> Nice to have such a consumer protection. Poorer adults have an extremely difficult time coming up with deposits, and not being able to afford a deposit traps them in an endless cycle of debt.

That’s partly true, but there are other effects that aren’t so good.

Because landlords can’t legally require a deposit large enough to cover their risk, they go to great lengths to screen prospective tenants. Ever been evicted? That’ll make it a lot harder to get future rentals. References give unscrupulous landlords

And instead of requiring larger deposits, landlords will find out where you work, what your income is, run a credit check and even look at your bank accounts to figure out if you’re poor and they don’t want to rent to you.

> [@SamuelA](#):
>
> At least from the few times I’ve read the conditions from a landlord for deciding if they will rent to you, they never seem like the landlord is giving themselves that kind of discretion. Aren’t landlords forced to tell you the reason they denied you? If the reason is from you exercising your rights in the courts and winning…that’s basically just the next landlord issuing you a check. What judge is not going to award you damages if you produce denial letters stating flat out the reason you can’t get housing is because the landlord has decided to snub their nose at the court system?

Obviously, this is going to depend on jurisdiction, but I don’t think landlords are required to tell you the reason they denied you. The closest thing I’ve ever gotten is a call saying the property was rented to someone else. Most of the time you just never hear anything (which probably means that they haven’t really denied you yet, they’re just working their way down from most desirable tenant to wherever you are).

Even if they did, are you saying that if a tenant who had sued his landlord in the past went to rent a new place, and the new potential landlord said “No thanks, we’re not interested in tenants who sue their landlords”, that the potential tenant would have cause to sue the new one? Pretty sure that’s not true. Do you have any cite that that’s true?

“People who have sued their landlords” is not a protected class.

> [@](#):
>
> Housing rentals are not job interviews. With job interviews, they can illegally discriminate and claim they found a “more qualified candidate”. I don’t see how they can do that for housing.

Sure they can. They can run a credit score and the person with a higher score is “more qualified”. They can _legitimately_ preferentially rent to someone who’s been at their job longer, who makes more money, who has fewer people living at the place, who doesn’t drive a motorcycle, who is a member of their Rotary Club, who got a personal recommendation from a friend… (or, if they are planning to illegally discriminate, they can claim one of the above reasons).

None of that is prohibited by the Fair Housing Act.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![dorvann](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/df705f/32.png) [@dorvann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dorvann)
#### Post date: [August 14, 2018, 7:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378/75 "2018-08-14T19:43:28Z")

</div>

> [@dalej42](#):
>
> $800 for a two bedroom, wow! I pay $1750 for a 520 sq ft studio in Chicago. It is a nice building, and the bedroom area is slightly separate. I think parking is abou $200 a month, but I don’t drive.

It’s actually pretty common in rural areas for rents for even two bedroom apartments to be under $1000 a month. Of course in rural areas your own car is necessity because there is no public transportation. The cost of maintaining a vehicle could easily make up the difference in housing cost. In my town a 4 bedroom house rents for $1500 a month.(You would still have to pay heat and electricity yourself.) It boggles my mind how much live in a city costs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![pulykamell](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pulykamell/32/3166_2.png) [@pulykamell](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pulykamell)
#### Post date: [August 14, 2018, 8:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378/76 "2018-08-14T20:04:19Z")

</div>

> [@dorvann](#):
>
> It’s actually pretty common in rural areas for rents for even two bedroom apartments to be under $1000 a month. Of course in rural areas your own car is necessity because there is no public transportation. The cost of maintaining a vehicle could easily make up the difference in housing cost. In my town a 4 bedroom house rents for $1500 a month.(You would still have to pay heat and electricity yourself.) It boggles my mind how much live in a city costs.

In my part of Chicago, which is not a “bad” part of town, right off the highway, 20-25 minutes by El into the Loop, we rent out our 2 bedroom, two-story house with garage for $1200/mo. Most properties in the area go for around the same price. It’s just not a “happening” part of town to live in. It doesn’t have to be ungodly expensive. You can definitely and easily find 2 bedroom apartments for under $1K here. We also have a one-bedroom in the heart of Hyde Park (where the University of Chicago is located) that’s around 800 sq ft that we rent out for $950/mo. But, yes, if you want to live in the more active North Side neighborhoods, you’re paying a good bit more.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![watchwolf49](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/e9c0ed/32.png) [@watchwolf49](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/watchwolf49)
#### Post date: [August 14, 2018, 11:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378/77 "2018-08-14T23:13:46Z")

</div>

> [@iamthewalrus\_3](#):
>
> [snip] … Obviously, this is going to depend on jurisdiction, but I don’t think landlords are required to tell you the reason they denied you. The closest thing I’ve ever gotten is a call saying the property was rented to someone else. Most of the time you just never hear anything (which probably means that they haven’t really denied you yet, they’re just working their way down from most desirable tenant to wherever you are).
> 
> Even if they did, are you saying that if a tenant who had sued his landlord in the past went to rent a new place, and the new potential landlord said “No thanks, we’re not interested in tenants who sue their landlords”, that the potential tenant would have cause to sue the new one? Pretty sure that’s not true. Do you have any cite that that’s true? … [snap]

In Oregon, if a landlord requires a screening fee with the application, first the landlord has to do the screening or return the money, then the landlord is required to notify the tenant of why they were refused tenancy … the tenant paid for a service, they’re entitled to know the results of that service … I avoided all this by simply not charging a screening fee … [ORS 90.295] …

I may have mistyped above … it appears ORS 90.303 only explicitly prohibits considering eviction actions against the tenant where the tenant prevails, and criminal complaints where the tenant was found not guilty … civil actions against a former landlord isn’t covered in this sub-section …

Again my warning … suing your landlord may have repercussions down the road … people who have the balls to sue their landlord is not a protected class under Fair Housing Laws …

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![SamuelA](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c77e96/32.png) [@SamuelA](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SamuelA)
#### Post date: [August 15, 2018, 12:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378/78 "2018-08-15T00:08:01Z")

</div>

> [@watchwolf49](#):
>
> Again my warning … suing your landlord may have repercussions down the road … people who have the balls to sue their landlord is not a protected class under Fair Housing Laws …

You’re still screwed if you take it to a judge if they sued and won. In the eyes of a judge, taking action against someone who _won_ in court is saying “screw you” to the entire judicial system.

And as for this “protected class” nonsense : if there are 8 open units in a complex, and I get refused entry for any reason that isn’t a justifiable, documented reason that is _reasonable_ in the eyes of that judge, it’s still de facto discrimination. You’re still going to lose.

If a clean cut individual walks into a restraunt and you refuse them service because you know they sued another restauraunt across town and won, that’s not gonna fly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![needscoffee](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/needscoffee/32/1076_2.png) [@needscoffee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/needscoffee)
#### Post date: [August 15, 2018, 12:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378/79 "2018-08-15T00:56:00Z")

</div>

> [@SamuelA](#):
>
> I’m one of those guys. I have 2 cats. Well, 3 right now because one of the kitties is a loaner from my girlfriend. And while the apartment only has carpet in the bedrooms, I know the cats have peed on them in a few different places. It doesn’t smell because I use enzyme spray but what the heck. \*\* 2 cats cost 30 a month in pet rent.\*\*
> 
> I know after I leave, which might be as soon as a year after I moved in, they will need to replace the bedroom carpet. It’s about 400 square feet, at $1 a square foot for installed cut rate discount carpet, that’s $400. And actually it’s a 2 bedroom apartment and the cats have peed in there as well. A lot more in there, actually. It doesn’t smell because I ran a carpet cleaning machine on it and my roommate knows to close the door. Still, it looks like these cats have done probably $400-$800 of damage, or about what the landlord is charging for a year.

(All bolding mine)  
2 rooms carpet = $800 plus tax, so probably\*\* $860-$880\*\*  
$30/mo x 12 mos = **$360** pet rent per year

So already your landlord is out **$500** on your cats (more if you leave in under a year)

> [@SamuelA](#):
>
> One isn’t spayed. Haven’t had time. **The urine may or may not have reached the pad.** Also the way I see it, since I am being forced to pay so much, I am not really feeling too bad about it.\*\* Every time I see them clawing the carpet or blinds\*\* or I have to spray something on the pee spot I see it as getting my money’s worth.
> 
> I have been planning to get the female cat fixed and then have her live outside if she keeps peeing outside her box though.

Plus replacement blinds.  
Is the carpet pad extra?

> [@SamuelA](#):
>
> And I don’t feel the slightest amount of guilt.\*\* I’ve been charged $800\*\* for the privilege

No, you’ll have been charged\* $360\* for the privilege, since you’ve already stated that you’ll leave as soon as a year after you moved in

> [@](#):
>
> and I’d feel ripped off if my pets didn’t do some damage. I clean their litter box consistently **and have tried to train the one that pees not to do it, but what can I do.**

Hmm…

> [@SamuelA](#):
>
> One isn’t spayed. Haven’t had time \<snip\> I have been planning to get the female cat fixed and then have her live outside if she keeps peeing outside her box though.

Maybe not spend so much time online justifying your procrastination/laziness on message boards and get your cat spayed?  
I’m still astonished at the idea of YOU feeling ripped off if your cats don’t cause at least $400-$800 in damage per year.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)
#### Post date: [August 15, 2018, 1:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378/80 "2018-08-15T01:35:18Z")

</div>

> [@watchwolf49](#):
>
> Again my warning … suing your landlord may have repercussions down the road … people who have the balls to sue their landlord is not a protected class under Fair Housing Laws …

Why would I volunteer that information? Is it a crime to lie to a landlord? If they want to hire a private detective to sniff out the public records in all jurisdictions, that is up to them.

As a sidebar, I once got a restraining order against a landlord, preventing her from entering my house unless it was for an emergency repair. It was served on her by a uniformed officer in a marked law enforcement vehicle in front of her house. It didn’t affect my next rental in the least.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-apartment-dwellers-have-to-pay-additional-rent-for-indoor-pets/819378.md?page=5)
