# Why do certain parts of the human body not regenerate like the rest?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-certain-parts-of-the-human-body-not-regenerate-like-the-rest/304922>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [May 22, 2005, 2:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-certain-parts-of-the-human-body-not-regenerate-like-the-rest/304922 "2005-05-22T02:02:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 13\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lobsang](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lobsang/32/4067_2.png) [@Lobsang](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lobsang)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2005, 2:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-certain-parts-of-the-human-body-not-regenerate-like-the-rest/304922/1 "2005-05-22T02:02:56Z")

</div>

The human body is a vessel of constant cell-regenetation. It’s how we’re able to live as long as we do… So why do some parts seem to ignore regeneration? Specifically sight, hearing, and brain-function?  
Will evolution one day grant us the extreme privilige of eternal life, which, based on the mechanism that allows us to live to the age of ninety is entirely possible, a mere formality of evolution’s process.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ike\_Witt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ike_witt/32/283_2.png) [@Ike\_Witt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ike_Witt)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2005, 2:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-certain-parts-of-the-human-body-not-regenerate-like-the-rest/304922/2 "2005-05-22T02:10:11Z")

</div>

Would you really want to live in a world where people were immortal? You’d pretty much have to sterlize the entire population.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Go\_You\_Big\_Red\_Fire\_Engine](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/eada6e/32.png) [@Go\_You\_Big\_Red\_Fire\_Engine](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Go_You_Big_Red_Fire_Engine)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2005, 6:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-certain-parts-of-the-human-body-not-regenerate-like-the-rest/304922/3 "2005-05-22T06:51:07Z")

</div>

> [@Lobsang](#):
>
> Will evolution one day grant us the extreme privilige of eternal life

No. By prolonging our lives we are going against evolution.

And there is evidence the brain can regenerate. I’m too lazy to find links right now, but all I’d do is google it, and you can do that 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smiling\_bandit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e9a140/32.png) [@smiling\_bandit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/smiling_bandit)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2005, 2:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-certain-parts-of-the-human-body-not-regenerate-like-the-rest/304922/4 "2005-05-22T14:06:37Z")

</div>

Related questions: how deep (in terms of both layers and length) do you have to get cut before it leaves a scar?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chrisk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@chrisk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/chrisk)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2005, 3:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-certain-parts-of-the-human-body-not-regenerate-like-the-rest/304922/5 "2005-05-22T15:04:27Z")

</div>

Well, nerve cells are some of the most complicated and sophisticated (relatively) cells in the body, and generally they lose the ability to divide and replicate themselves once they go into ‘active service’, unlike muscle cells, connector cells, bone marrow cells, intestinal lining cells, kidney cells, etcetera.

And, unfortunately, evolution didn’t happen to hit on a design that would have included keeping viable pre-nerve cells around as ‘backups’ in case large numbers of the operational nerves were destroyed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scott\_Plaid](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/258eb7/32.png) [@Scott\_Plaid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scott_Plaid)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2005, 4:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-certain-parts-of-the-human-body-not-regenerate-like-the-rest/304922/6 "2005-05-22T16:31:32Z")

</div>

Just my two cents: I know the OP is talking about skin, but doesn’t the liver regenrate, as well as the tips of fingers?

As I recall, anything beyond that is too complex. 😕

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smeghead](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f1d935/32.png) [@Smeghead](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Smeghead)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2005, 6:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-certain-parts-of-the-human-body-not-regenerate-like-the-rest/304922/7 "2005-05-22T18:18:54Z")

</div>

Actually, there are some nerve cells that do regenerate. Your olfactory nerves, for instance, die and regenerate all the time. There are nerve stem cells up in your nose that hang around for life. A lot of stem cell research has been done with these cells. They’ve been used experimentally, with some limited success, to treat spinal cord injuries.

So it’s not that these cells can’t regenerate, it’s just that we haven’t developed a body plan that includes a provision to make them regenerate for whatever reason.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WhyNot](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/c77e96/32.png) [@WhyNot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WhyNot)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2005, 8:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-certain-parts-of-the-human-body-not-regenerate-like-the-rest/304922/8 "2005-05-22T20:30:43Z")

</div>

> [@smiling bandit](#):
>
> Related questions: how deep (in terms of both layers and length) do you have to get cut before it leaves a scar?

Depends more on the person and the placement than the size of the cut. I scar very easily - I have one scar from a particularly nasty paper cut. My brother, on the other hand, hardly scars at all. He suffered a three inch gash which required stiches, and there’s no scarring whatsoever. (He also can’t pierce, BTW - any holes close up within moments of taking a piece out to switch it.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Go\_You\_Big\_Red\_Fire\_Engine](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/eada6e/32.png) [@Go\_You\_Big\_Red\_Fire\_Engine](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Go_You_Big_Red_Fire_Engine)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2005, 9:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-certain-parts-of-the-human-body-not-regenerate-like-the-rest/304922/9 "2005-05-22T21:38:04Z")

</div>

> [@Scott Plaid](#):
>
> Just my two cents: I know the OP is talking about skin, but doesn’t the liver regenrate, as well as the tips of fingers?
> 
> As I recall, anything beyond that is too complex. 😕

The OP didn’t mention anything about skin.  
It’s not about complexity. The liver is pretty damn complex. It’s just that for some reason, evolution left it with an ability to regenerate. And as someone said earlier, nerve cells can regenerate, its not often though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panache45](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/panache45/32/64_2.png) [@panache45](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panache45)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2005, 12:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-certain-parts-of-the-human-body-not-regenerate-like-the-rest/304922/10 "2005-05-23T00:35:56Z")

</div>

> [@Lobsang](#):
>
> So why do some parts seem to ignore regeneration? Specifically sight, hearing, and brain-function?

If you’re looking for an answer in the context of evolution, there’s only one answer:

Some body parts don’t regenerate because our ancestors were able to survive long enough to procreate without those body parts regenerating.

In general, our sight, hearing and brain function start to degenerate many years after our procreative years (at least what our procreative years used to be), so it’s not a “flaw” that would be “corrected” by evolution.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f1d935/32.png) [@CC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CC)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2005, 12:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-certain-parts-of-the-human-body-not-regenerate-like-the-rest/304922/11 "2005-05-23T00:52:07Z")

</div>

> [@Go You Big Red Fire Engine](#):
>
> No. By prolonging our lives we are going against evolution.

I disagree, and I’m pretty sure others would as well. We have already, in fact, prolonged our lives by previous inventions and discoveries. Evolution merely (!) naturally selects the most fit to survive and reproduce. If at this point in time, we have evolved to the stage that we can use our minds to increase our lifespan even further, then that is the natural state of events and the point to which we have evolved. And so on and so on. Our brains, and what we can do with them are our most significant adaptation to the threats and challenges to our continued existence.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Go\_You\_Big\_Red\_Fire\_Engine](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/eada6e/32.png) [@Go\_You\_Big\_Red\_Fire\_Engine](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Go_You_Big_Red_Fire_Engine)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2005, 3:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-certain-parts-of-the-human-body-not-regenerate-like-the-rest/304922/12 "2005-05-23T03:29:58Z")

</div>

I meant more along the lines of natural selection. People, despite not being the most fit people, will survive because medicine allows them to. But I see that what I said was fundamentally wrong.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scott\_Plaid](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/258eb7/32.png) [@Scott\_Plaid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scott_Plaid)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2005, 4:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-certain-parts-of-the-human-body-not-regenerate-like-the-rest/304922/13 "2005-05-23T04:03:31Z")

</div>

> [@Go You Big Red Fire Engine](#):
>
> The OP didn’t mention anything about skin.

I posted late at night. :smack:
