Why do I find movies so engaging and plays so boring?

First of all, it’s important to remember that theater and film are two completely different forms of media. Don’t be folled by their similarities. The question of the OP is more like “Why do I like reading novels but hate going to the opera?” than, I dunno, “Why do I like science-fiction novels but not fantasy novels?” It’s still a perfectly reasonable thing to wonder about, but don’t make the mistake of thinking that theater and film are more alike than they are.

I think film has spoiled some people for theater because they expect plays to be like movies. If you ever want to enjoy theater, you’ve just got to get that notion out of your head. Plays are not movies, you will not be able to see the same things you do in movies, and the acting style is not going to be the same as in movies. That’s just the way it is. You have to go into the theater with the right expectations, otherwise you’re bound to be disappointed – just like you’d be disappointed reading a book if you expected to hear the character’s voices.

Of course, it’s also important to remember that plenty of theatrical performances really aren’t all that good. The world is not full of truly great actors. The ones who are truly great are rarely going to be doing a show in your hometown, unless your hometown is someplace like NYC or London. A Hollywood movie may be able to put some of the finest actors in the world before you, but the best many theatrical companies can manage is the finest actors in town. I’ve seen campus theater Shakespeare and I’ve seen Shakespeare at The Globe, and they were very different experiences. If I’d never had the chance to see the latter, I might think seeing Shakespeare live was overrated and figure that you might as well watch the movie instead.

Oh, and to The Scrivener, my favorite play of all time is Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead…and it made a pretty bad movie. Not because the script was bad (it was essentially the same as the play script, after all!), or because the actors or sets or costumes or directing were bad. In fact, it may be overly harsh to say it was a “bad” movie, but it didn’t work. It simply did not work on screen the way it works on stage.

Tom Stoppard’s plays should stay on the stage and his screenplays should stay on the screen. He’s great at both though.

I assume we’re talking about more modern film here, right?

The best explanation I can think of is that Films have a lot of dumb tricks to put you into the middle of the story, whereas in live theatre it’s got a lot more to do with more simple things like stage design, rudimentary sound effects, and the plain old skill of the actors involved.

Tricks films have that the live theatre doesn’t:

Multiple cameras. The editors can switch perspectives whenever there’s a “shift” in the dialogue or mood. You can’t do that on stage unless you’re the only one in the audience and can run really fast. :slight_smile: This camera effect gives the illusion of a lot of drama. Anyone ever play the Resident Evil series of video games? Notice how the camera generally looks at your character from a stationary location, then follows you as you move. This gives the illusion that something’s on the ceiling watching you as you walk around, and it’s CREEPY. You can’t do that in a play.

Also, you’ve got the ever popular close-up. It’s another way you can add more drama to a scene because people’s faces are so expressive. If you could always see the actor’s face in a production of Romeo and Juliet, you’d be able to connect with them a lot better.

A lot of the techniques that you might learn as a cameraman for a movie really make things very forgiving for the actors because they can be much more introverted and still convey a lot of emotion. Subtlety is harder to do for someone in a play because you’re communicating some pretty meek emotions to people who are 100 feet away from you. It’s amazing though, because the fact that they’re right there, breathing, in front of you can help you identify with them more, and that means that if you ever see a truly GREAT actor in a performance on-stage, I’d almost guarantee you’ll be captivated.

Reaver