I’ve gotten stung by the Levi’s variability too, and that was about a decade ago. I went to the store tried on a pair of 505s, and they fit well. I grabbed another of the same size off the shelf, and purchased them both. At home when I tried on the second pair, it was way too tight to wear. Pretty annoying.
Since then, I make sure that I try on every pair that I purchase. There have been times where one pair fits great, and another doesn’t.
I’m puzzled by this. Boot cut means that the legs narrow only slightly, to make them fit better over boots. I know it’s been offered continuously since at least the early 70s when I worked in a store that sold them. At the time the cuts were regular, boot cut, flare, and bell bottom. The latter two became passe after the 70s but boot cut is absolutely standard.
As in all manufactured items, there are allowable tolerances specified in the contract to outsourced factories. As mentioned, the quality control on the other end of the world is not likely up to the contract standards, nor to company standards. Levi should have addressed this immediately, but then that means profit loss while the correction is going on. At some point, profits will drop from lost sales, and there will be an ad blitz to try to recover. If they wait too long, it will be too late and another iconic company will go down the toilet through outsourcing.
Men’s pants from L.L. Bean have a similar issue, except that you’ll also see drastic variations from one fabric color to another within the same line of pants…for instance, their tropic-weight pants in British khaki have a roomy fit with a bit of extra length, while the same size pants in regular khaki are snug and a bit short.
I like(d) the Levis “Authentic Signature” line that Target used to sell. They fit me well and were durable. Alas, the Target stores near me stopped carrying them. So I went online and ordered them from Walmart. I ordered 3 pairs, the same size/style/color that I had before, and every pair was just a little bigger and baggier than the ones from Target. Since I’m a little bigger and baggier myself these days, it worked out okay. But I feel like I’m wearing “mom jeans” now. (not that there’s anything wrong with that)
Is it a guy thing, to buy jeans you’ve never tried on? I would ***never ***buy a pair of jeans I hadn’t tried on, much as I wouldn’t buy a bra I hadn’t tried. And if I did, and then found it didn’t fit, I’d return it.
Women shop, men replace. My standard wardrobe includes two pair of Levis in good repair (one blue, one black), and when a pair wears out I go and buy the exact same style and size. Since 32" should still be the same, fit shouldn’t be an issue so I skip trying them on.
That said, in recent years the trust has gone out of the relationship somewhat - I make sure they fit at home before I remove the tags, as manufacturers have lowered the rise on a lot of wardrobe staples recently, which gets annoying. It used to be they specified low-rise, now a lot of brands just assume. I’ve heard younger motorcycle riders complain about cold air rushing down their pants with low-rise jeans, and the belt loop would be too low to attach your jacket like a normal person.
I’ll confess to this too. The last pair of Levi’s I bought were paper-thin-- a sad, ersatz replica of the heavy duty, board-stiff jeans I broke in as a kid. No doubt Kirkland jeans are just as sweatshop-sourced, but the quality is closer to the good old Levis I remember than the junk they’re selling as “Levi’s” now.
I just wish they didn’t say “KIRKLAND” on the ass-patch. I do have a tiny bit of pride.
Bean’s Women’s pants too. In their khakis I’m a size 8 like most other brands, but in their cords I’m a laughable size 4. I’m so very much not a size 4.
I don’t usually buy clothes online, but in the case of the Levis Signature Authentics, I previously had five or six pairs from Target that fit me just fine. The ones I bought online were okay but just a little big. If I had gone down a size they would’ve been too small, so I just went with it. By the time I get around to buying more, the sizing will probably have changed again (and I will probably have gained a pound or two)
I’ve noticed a similar variance in sizing with color, but in my experience it has been that the darker the denim, the looser the fit. I don’t buy black jeans, so I can’t speak for that. But my best fitting pairs are lighter indigo, the baggiest are darker indigo. Even more annoying to me since I prefer darker.
I really need to find a good jeans brand that can actually manage basic QC.
It says in the description “designed for the urban cyclist”. I can’t imagine men in general starting to wear something so outre (the men I know fret if the pinstripes on a white shirt are too thin or too thick).
It’s a guy thing in that you expect, for a certain brand, a given waist and inseam will fit you. Yes, there are differences - Dockers, for example, fit very differently than Levi’s, because Dockers are typically expected to be worn up to the true waist (at your navel or just a bit below) while Levi’s are typically worn today below the waist (closer to the hips.) But in my case, I’ve gone to a B&M store, tried on a pair of Levi’s, found they fit great. Then I order a few more pairs online, same brand number, same size, and they all fit differently. It’s just sloppy manufacturing.
I’ve seen them in Chicago worn by lots of guys; they’re not much different than the huge baggy jeans shorts you see a lot of guys wearing here that are about as long.
I had already removed the tags and thrown out the receipt the day before when I got home with them as my assumption was that same size + same brand + same style = same fit.