# Why do people bother protesting?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [February 11, 2006, 12:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985 "2006-02-11T12:47:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shagnasty](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9dc877/32.png) [@Shagnasty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shagnasty)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2006, 4:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985/21 "2006-02-12T04:40:58Z")

</div>

> [@Fear Itself](#):
>
> This implies you believe protesters receive preferential treatment when they break the law. Care to give some examples?

That is a little like asking for a cite the sky is blue. Boston had a transportation workers strike and protest a few years ago that led to them blocking major traffic routes including tunnels during rush hour. I don’t believe that was an isolated event if you take the Northeast and nation as a whole. The Seattle WTO (actually anything to do with the WTO in the U.S. or Canada) brought on all kinds of destructive activity including damage to businesses. There are countless instances of egging and minor vanadlism all over the place.

We can send a team of reference librarrians to compile a series of books on the topic if you would like but I was just talking about a general idea.

Police are hesitant to arrest all criminal protesters because they fight back, they claim rights, and there are just so many of them. Their hands are somewhat tied unlike it would be if two juvenile deliquents were engaging in the same activity.

I mean exactly what I say when protesters should be subject to exactly the same laws as any other person under ordinary conditions. If teenagers randomly jump out in front of cars and hold them there, it makes the news. If a group of protesters does it, it may be ignored. Police know they have to be careful with organized protests and that is one reason I don’t like them. It is an intentional assembly of a mob and it can have unintended consequences when the lesser minded get worked into a frenzy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![What\_Exit](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/what_exit/32/10652_2.png) [@What\_Exit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/What_Exit)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2006, 5:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985/22 "2006-02-12T05:00:16Z")

</div>

You do realize that for every big newsworthy and disruptive protest, there are dozens of small peaceful protests?

Outside a base their might be a dozen (aging hippies) protesting the war and another dozen Soldier Supporters at least 100 feet away.  
Small union shops will have 10 members with signs and lawn chairs.  
Local Environmental groups might get 20 supporters for short rallies to demand a cleanup or prevent a new source of pollution.  
Historical Societies may get 7 Seniors to try to stop the destruction of a cherished Old House / Building.  
Etc.

I am not saying most of these do any good, but they also don’t do any harm.

Jim

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shagnasty](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9dc877/32.png) [@Shagnasty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shagnasty)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2006, 5:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985/23 "2006-02-12T05:10:11Z")

</div>

> [@What Exit?](#):
>
> You do realize that for every big newsworthy and disruptive protest, there are dozens of small peaceful protests?
> 
> Outside a base their might be a dozen (aging hippies) protesting the war and another dozen Soldier Supporters at least 100 feet away.  
> Small union shops will have 10 members with signs and lawn chairs.  
> Local Environmental groups might get 20 supporters for short rallies to demand a cleanup or prevent a new source of pollution.  
> Historical Societies may get 7 Seniors to try to stop the destruction of a cherished Old House / Building.  
> Etc.
> 
> I am not saying most of these do any good, but they also don’t do any harm.
> 
> Jim

Absolutley. I have a love/hate relationship with aging hippies as much as the next person but I never said (or implied) that all protests go bad. Some however, slip in behavior that would not be allowed outside of a protest and victimizes people that just want to go about their day.

I also understand police issues with enforicng normal laws with them. They are proven whiners and mainpulators by nature and that is a dangerous problem when you are talking about legalities and procedure.

It is more of a wishful thought to be left alone in peace by them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Digital\_Stimulus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/aeb1de/32.png) [@Digital\_Stimulus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Digital_Stimulus)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2006, 5:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985/24 "2006-02-12T05:10:57Z")

</div>

> [@What Exit?](#):
>
> You do realize that for every big newsworthy and disruptive protest, there are dozens of small peaceful protests?

Thank you for reiterating that, I just didn’t have the gumption.

I don’t know what areas **Evil One** and **Shagnasty** live in, but it seems the only protests they’re aware of are similar in kind to PETA paint-throwing, KKK cross burnings, and anti-abortion hate-fests. Nothing like the repetition of extreme examples to reinforce biases.

Oh, I should also state that I think protestors who break the law should indeed be prosecuted just like anyone else. But it’s such a small contingent (although highly visible) as to not address the rightness/wrongness of protesting _in general_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shagnasty](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9dc877/32.png) [@Shagnasty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shagnasty)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2006, 5:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985/25 "2006-02-12T05:29:46Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Digital Stimulus]  
Thank you for reiterating that, I just didn’t have the gumption.

I don’t know what areas **Evil One** and **Shagnasty** live in, but it seems the only protests they’re aware of are similar in kind to PETA paint-throwing, KKK cross burnings, and anti-abortion hate-fests. Nothing like the repetition of extreme examples to reinforce biases.QUOTE]

Again, I don’t think that most protests are violent or destructive.

1. I believe that some well throught out and orchestrated protests have been effective.

2. I think most of today’s garden variety protests are anti-intellectual circle jerks that let people feel like they are making a difference.

3. Some protests are an outlet to express individual deviance or mob mentality. Some police forces don’t have good procedures or leadership to draw the line. People get away with things that harm others simply because they are hidden in a group that started out having legal protections although they deviated out of bounds.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Digital\_Stimulus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/aeb1de/32.png) [@Digital\_Stimulus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Digital_Stimulus)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2006, 5:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985/26 "2006-02-12T05:46:20Z")

</div>

**Shagnasty** – OK. I don’t have a particular issue with either your (1) or (3), but I think you’re overestimating (2); I take back including you in my last post (are take-backs allowed?).

I was using a previous post of yours:

> [@Shagnasty](#):
>
> That type of thinking is one of the reason that those particular “yahoos” have no power. They have regressed to a state below their state in the first decade of their life.

and evidently extending it further than I should have. I mean, “yahoos”? “Regressed to a state…”? I took them as more inflammatory than it appears you meant.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![humann](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/838e76/32.png) [@humann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/humann)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2006, 6:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985/27 "2006-02-12T06:07:49Z")

</div>

> [@Walter Windchill](#):
>
> I think that protests are quite evidently passe.

I’m afraid you’re right. Protests are out and apathy’s in. Not that apathy needs any cheerleaders mind you–it’s doing just fine on its own.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![What\_Exit](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/what_exit/32/10652_2.png) [@What\_Exit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/What_Exit)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2006, 6:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985/28 "2006-02-12T06:11:25Z")

</div>

> [@humann](#):
>
> I’m afraid you’re right. Protests are out and apathy’s in. Not that apathy needs any cheerleaders mind you–it’s doing just fine on its own.

Hi, welcome to the boards. Enjoy the stay.

Jim

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shagnasty](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9dc877/32.png) [@Shagnasty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shagnasty)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2006, 6:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985/29 "2006-02-12T06:19:00Z")

</div>

> [@Digital Stimulus](#):
>
> and evidently extending it further than I should have. I mean, “yahoos”? “Regressed to a state…”? I took them as more inflammatory than it appears you meant.

All that means is that much protesting is a childish, knee-jerk thing to do and is almost never the best use of resources. If you have an issue and that much man-power to throw at it, not need to think effectiveness if you actually care about the end result.

That could be mailings, setting up a website, meetings with influential people, contacting the media. The sky is the limit really. You ideas need to be well thought out and coherent however and that is often a limiting factor.

Ill thought out protesting can and does have a real backlash. Even though the protestors themselves can’t see it, the types of people that can influence change see the fuzzy-headedness for what it is. Combine that with a perception or thugery, immaturity, and cluelessness and you have created a real PR problem (see PETA).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![What\_Exit](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/what_exit/32/10652_2.png) [@What\_Exit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/What_Exit)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2006, 6:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985/30 "2006-02-12T06:41:42Z")

</div>

> [@Shagnasty](#):
>
> …snip…  
> Ill thought out protesting can and does have a real backlash. Even though the protestors themselves can’t see it, the types of people that can influence change see the fuzzy-headedness for what it is. Combine that with a perception or thugery, immaturity, and cluelessness and you have created a real PR problem (see PETA).

I am not saying you do this, but sometimes I think PETA is the best thing that ever happened for the Right Wing.  
Arguments get made bashing environmental groups by including PETA as one (they are not!!!). Or bashing all liberals because they are represented by PETA.

If you favor any limits on lab testing, PETA gets thrown in your face.  
You want a rational policy that stops trapping but allows farming Fur animals, again PETA gets used against you.  
PETA even promoted a campaign to drink Beer not Milk because somehow milking cows was cruelty. WTF??? I hate PETA as much as I hate Pro-Lifers that blow people up. These are the fringe crazies. The Whack jobs, the unibombers of the world.

Jim {sorry for the rant}

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Digital\_Stimulus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/aeb1de/32.png) [@Digital\_Stimulus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Digital_Stimulus)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2006, 2:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985/31 "2006-02-12T14:00:22Z")

</div>

> [@Shagnasty](#):
>
> All that means is that much protesting is a childish, knee-jerk thing to do and is almost never the best use of resources. If you have an issue and that much man-power to throw at it, not need to think effectiveness if you actually care about the end result.

And again, I think you wrongly characterize protests in general. I absolutely agree with you that some (or perhaps many) protests fit that mold – I just disagree that no qualifier (or “most” as the qualifier) is right. As I (and **What Exit?** ) have said, I think there are far more _not_ childish, _not_ knee-jerk protests than you are allowing. That’s all.

In other words, I don’t think that PETA represents the majority or usual tenor of protests, and using them as the operative group to define “protestors” is neither accurate, nor useful, in gauging the effectiveness or utility of protesting. They’re often nutters whom, I agree, do more harm than good.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2006, 2:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985/32 "2006-02-12T14:15:54Z")

</div>

> [@Shagnasty](#):
>
> That is a little like asking for a cite the sky is blue.

Indulge me.

> [@](#):
>
> Boston had a transportation workers strike and protest a few years ago that led to them blocking major traffic routes including tunnels during rush hour.

Cite man, cite. I have searched high and low, and all I could find was a [janitor’s strike in 2002](http://www.union-network.org/uniproperty.nsf/0/f7c654aeb7e6895ac1256c25001db2c1?OpenDocument) near the Callahan tunnel:

> [@](#):
>
> Escalating their activities, Boston-area janitors and their supporters marched and staged acts of civil disobedience around the city yesterday, including a sit-down demonstration near the Callahan Tunnel **that led to 26 arrests** , on the fourth day of a strike in which the Prudential Center was added to the list of buildings targeted for walkouts.

No preferential treatment there.

> [@](#):
>
> The Seattle WTO (actually anything to do with the WTO in the U.S. or Canada) brought on all kinds of destructive activity including damage to businesses. There are countless instances of egging and minor vanadlism all over the place.

And it is your recollection that no one was arrested? [That is funny](http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/544447.stm):

> [@](#):
>
> Seattle police have \*\*arrested about 200 activists \*\* protesting at the world trade talks as they tighten security ahead of a speech by President Bill Clinton.

Is that the preferential treatment you were talking about?

> [@](#):
>
> Police are hesitant to arrest all criminal protesters because they fight back, they claim rights, and there are just so many of them. Their hands are somewhat tied unlike it would be if two juvenile deliquents were engaging in the same activity.

The nerve of them, claiming rights!

> [@](#):
>
> We can send a team of reference librarrians to compile a series of books on the topic if you would like but I was just talking about a general idea.

Given the fuzzy nature of your memory and your tendency to fabricate anecdotes to support your political views, I think that will be necessary.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![What\_Exit](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/what_exit/32/10652_2.png) [@What\_Exit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/What_Exit)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2006, 3:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985/33 "2006-02-12T15:47:24Z")

</div>

> [@Fear Itself](#):
>
> Indulge me. Cite man, cite. I have searched high and low, and all I could find was a [janitor’s strike in 2002](http://www.union-network.org/uniproperty.nsf/0/f7c654aeb7e6895ac1256c25001db2c1?OpenDocument) near the Callahan tunnel:No preferential treatment there. And it is your recollection that no one was arrested? [That is funny](http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/544447.stm):Is that the preferential treatment you were talking about?  
> The nerve of them, claiming rights!  
> Given the fuzzy nature of your memory and your tendency to fabricate anecdotes to support your political views, I think that will be necessary.

I agree with everything you say until the last sentence; that is effectively just taking a personal jab at **Shagnasty**.  
You are effectively calling him a habitual liar in slightly politer words. Amazingly everyone has been very civil in this debate. I just feel you should apologize for the low blow.

Again I agree with everything else you said and I wouldn’t mind seeing some cites from **Shagnasty**.

Jim

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2006, 4:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985/34 "2006-02-12T16:01:56Z")

</div>

> [@What Exit?](#):
>
> You are effectively calling him a habitual liar in slightly politer words. Amazingly everyone has been very civil in this debate. I just feel you should apologize for the low blow.
> 
> Again I agree with everything else you said and I wouldn’t mind seeing some cites from **Shagnasty**.
> 
> Jim

I am not calling him a liar (though to do so is curiously [not against GD policy](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=7044959&postcount=134)); I am accusing him of posting unsupported positions and employing lazy debating techniques. I expressed no personal animus towards **Shagnasty**.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Airman\_Doors\_USAF](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e36b37/32.png) [@Airman\_Doors\_USAF](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Airman_Doors_USAF)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2006, 4:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985/35 "2006-02-12T16:11:03Z")

</div>

> [@Ravenman](#):
>
> Anti-war protests seemed to have an effect on President Johnson.

Indeed, but they didn’t end the war, which was the goal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![What\_Exit](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/what_exit/32/10652_2.png) [@What\_Exit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/What_Exit)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2006, 4:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985/36 "2006-02-12T16:21:12Z")

</div>

> [@Fear Itself](#):
>
> I am not calling him a liar (though to do so is curiously [not against GD policy](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=7044959&postcount=134)); I am accusing him of posting unsupported positions and employing lazy debating techniques. I expressed no personal animus towards **Shagnasty**.

I wasn’t junior modding, I was just talking politeness. As I said, I agreed with everything you said but this line:

> [@](#):
>
> tendency to fabricate anecdotes

This is a polite way to call someone a liar.

Jim

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shagnasty](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9dc877/32.png) [@Shagnasty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shagnasty)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2006, 4:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985/37 "2006-02-12T16:23:32Z")

</div>

> [@What Exit?](#):
>
> I agree with everything you say until the last sentence; that is effectively just taking a personal jab at **Shagnasty**.  
> You are effectively calling him a habitual liar in slightly politer words. Amazingly everyone has been very civil in this debate. I just feel you should apologize for the low blow.
> 
> Again I agree with everything else you said and I wouldn’t mind seeing some cites from **Shagnasty**.
> 
> Jim

It is Ok. I think we are actually talking about the same things although the expectation may have been different. The examples given with the Janitor’s Strike and others are more or less what I am talking about. It isn’t that existing laws don’t or can’t cover what happens when things get rowdy, it is that the mob mentality and the legal protections of general assembly mean that limits gets pushed until innocent people are harmed.

It is really a law enforcement issue and I can see why these situations can be touchy. Traffic blocking is common. The consequences of that can be anything up the the very serious. There are countless examples of pelting and vandalism all over the place. Some examples of that have already been given.

Threatening and harrassing scabs trying to cross a picket line is a common union tactic and one I find reprehensible.

Of course things can go the other way. The Kent State shootings are what can happen when the police and military take a hardline stance against such behavior.

I am just pointing those types of consequences a natural result of some types of protests and I believe it is a strike against their creation because risks to innocents are there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2006, 4:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985/38 "2006-02-12T16:23:57Z")

</div>

> [@What Exit?](#):
>
> This is a polite way to call someone a liar.

And though I disagree with you, to do so is within the policy of this forum.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shagnasty](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9dc877/32.png) [@Shagnasty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shagnasty)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2006, 5:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985/39 "2006-02-12T17:15:57Z")

</div>

> [@Fear Itself](#):
>
> And though I disagree with you, to do so is within the policy of this forum.

I don’t see where the liar part ever applied though. My only point was that one downside to protesting is that they sometimes turn ugly and harm others. That should be self-evident to anyone and you went back and found the references that I was talking about. I never said that the law protected protesters from criminal acts in theory. It is just that mobs can get out of hand and it is difficult for law enforcement to draw the line when they start with some degree of protection.

There are examples of this every year. I just didn’t feel like documenting the history of protests gone bad because it would take volumes to do so. I have run into them as have family and friends so they can’t be that rare.

I was blocked from leaving work one day. My wife was effectively held hostage for 6 hours in the French countryside when the tour bus she was leading was blockaded. She also couldn’t get home one night because of the Janitor’s strike. I got blocked by a small Teamsters strike in a parking lot 3 years ago.

I never said that all or most turned that way. Where did the lies come in and what was the initial source of confusion?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2006, 5:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985/40 "2006-02-12T17:39:58Z")

</div>

> [@Shagnasty](#):
>
> My only point was that one downside to protesting is that they sometimes turn ugly and harm others.

Well, that and you implied that protesters get preferential treatment from police:

> [@](#):
>
> Originally Posted by **Shagnasty**  
> It sure gets annoying though and I firmly believe that disruptive and destructive protesters should face the same penalties as any everyday citizen doing the same thing outside of protesting.

> [@](#):
>
> I mean exactly what I say when protesters should be subject to exactly the same laws as any other person under ordinary conditions. If teenagers randomly jump out in front of cars and hold them there, it makes the news. If a group of protesters does it, it may be ignored.

That is what I was responding to. I was not contesting the assertion that protesters sometimes break the law or cause disruptions. They do, and they are arrested for it, like ordinary people, if not moreso. Only protesters get segregated into Free Speech Zones and arrested if they do not comply. Those who wave flags and blow kisses to the Establishment are not harassed.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-people-bother-protesting/343985.md?page=3)
