# Why do these metal objects bounce around in an MRI?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-these-metal-objects-bounce-around-in-an-mri/810265>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [March 8, 2018, 10:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-these-metal-objects-bounce-around-in-an-mri/810265 "2018-03-08T22:26:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Machine\_Elf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/82dd89/32.png) [@Machine\_Elf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Machine_Elf)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2018, 10:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-these-metal-objects-bounce-around-in-an-mri/810265/1 "2018-03-08T22:26:44Z")

</div>

[Video here](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BBx8BwLhqg) of some people playing with the magnetic fields in an MRI machine. At t=4 seconds, he throws a steel shackle into the tube, and it bounces around violently before coming to a stop. At t=13 seconds, the same thing happens to a stapler.

Question: why do these things bounce around so violently? In all my tinkering with magnets and metal, the two items clap together once and that’s it. What’s going on in there?  
Noteworthy (but not a question): later in the video they dangle an office chair in the magnetic field, and observe over 2000 pounds of pull. :eek:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![beowulff](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/beowulff/32/542_2.png) [@beowulff](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/beowulff)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2018, 11:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-these-metal-objects-bounce-around-in-an-mri/810265/2 "2018-03-08T23:07:02Z")

</div>

The magnetic field in the MRI is mostly Axial. So, when an object is thrown into it, it gets accelerated rapidly down the length of the tube, overshoots, then gets accelerated back the way it came.  
Since it was probably not thrown exactly down the centerline, it bounces around until it comes to rest on a wall, someplace where the field diverges from perfectly parallel.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tim\_T-Bonham.net](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/46a35a/32.png) [@Tim\_T-Bonham.net](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tim_T-Bonham.net)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2018, 12:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-these-metal-objects-bounce-around-in-an-mri/810265/3 "2018-03-09T00:04:17Z")

</div>

Also, the magnetic field is changing constantly & rapidly inside an MRI (that’s what it needs to do to produce the images), so that would toss the metal objects around.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Francis\_Vaughan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/francis_vaughan/32/3093_2.png) [@Francis\_Vaughan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Francis_Vaughan)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2018, 12:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-these-metal-objects-bounce-around-in-an-mri/810265/4 "2018-03-09T00:43:46Z")

</div>

Only when actually imaging are the gradient coils energised and the magnetic field changing - and it changes only by a very tiny amount. The main field is so dominant that the gradient field is imperceptible in comparison.

That is a really serious magnet. 4 Tesla means it is intended for imaging phosphorus as well as hydrogen. That isn’t your usual MRI machine.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2018, 12:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-these-metal-objects-bounce-around-in-an-mri/810265/5 "2018-03-09T00:50:44Z")

</div>

Whoa, these folks are throwing around staplers, in a 4 T magnet? They’re braver than I, that’s for sure.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![beowulff](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/beowulff/32/542_2.png) [@beowulff](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/beowulff)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2018, 4:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-these-metal-objects-bounce-around-in-an-mri/810265/6 "2018-03-09T04:33:18Z")

</div>

[Recent MRI fatality.](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mri-death-mumbai-india-hospital-accident-byl-nair-charitable-hospital/)

Note that the article says that the victim was assured that the machine was “turned off.” This shows a surprising level of ignorance about how an MRI works. In normal operation, the main (superconducting) magnet is _never_ turned off.  
To do so, and then to have to re-start it is a big deal, and so it is avoided unless the power fails, or the machine needs service.  
So, an MRI can be assumed to be _never_ safe to have ferrous metals near it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Napier](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ce73a5/32.png) [@Napier](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Napier)\
**Post date:** [March 10, 2018, 3:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-these-metal-objects-bounce-around-in-an-mri/810265/7 "2018-03-10T15:50:58Z")

</div>

There is, or at least was, a rule of thumb that says MRI machines cost about a million dollars per tesla. They’re throwing projectiles around in the heart of a four million dollar machine, it appears. I wonder why this is OK? Maybe the inner lining of the magnet was going to be replaced anyway?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![scr4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/59ef9b/32.png) [@scr4](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/scr4)\
**Post date:** [March 10, 2018, 4:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-these-metal-objects-bounce-around-in-an-mri/810265/8 "2018-03-10T16:00:23Z")

</div>

> [@Napier](#):
>
> There is, or at least was, a rule of thumb that says MRI machines cost about a million dollars per tesla. They’re throwing projectiles around in the heart of a four million dollar machine, it appears. I wonder why this is OK? Maybe the inner lining of the magnet was going to be replaced anyway?

The description points to [this video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SOUJP5dFEg) (in which they do something even more destructive), where they say:

> [@](#):
>
> The magnet was a decade old and no longer used for research. Weighing four tons and requiring expensive rigging to remove/ship, and with a scrap value only in the tens of thousands (there’s not much of a market for old 4 T magnets), it was better for us to convert it into a “mock scanner,” for practice functional MRI sessions. So the specialty equipment is still in use, just not as a scanner.
