# Why do we have to put up with Religious People?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [August 7, 2020, 6:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474 "2020-08-07T06:20:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 34

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2020, 9:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474/663 "2020-09-07T21:30:42Z")

</div>

It’s NOT “lack of superstition” , that would be agnostics. Atheists _believe_, with nothing but faith, that there is no god.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2020, 9:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474/664 "2020-09-07T21:31:44Z")

</div>

SSM is now a matter of law, the issue is dead. Got anything current?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2020, 9:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474/665 "2020-09-07T21:34:23Z")

</div>

The definition of when a life begins is not a silly superstition. We all believe (unless you think that is a silly superstition) that “thou shall not murder” - the question of when a zygote becomes a child is a matter of definitions and law, not superstition. In fact the Bible barely touches on abortion, if at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![needscoffee](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/needscoffee/32/1076_2.png) [@needscoffee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/needscoffee)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2020, 9:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474/666 "2020-09-07T21:35:54Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> It’s NOT “lack of superstition” , that would be agnostics. Atheists _believe_, with nothing but faith, that there is no god

That is false. As has been explained innumerable times here.

Even if it weren’t false, that still is not “superstition”. Unless not believing in unicorns until/unless one actually sees one is “superstition”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2020, 9:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474/667 "2020-09-07T21:36:59Z")

</div>

No, the _certain belief that there are none_ is a matter of faith, not knowledge, and thus, comes under 'superstition" by that posters definition of faith = superstition.

Agnosticism is lack of belief. Atheism is a belief that there are no gods.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![needscoffee](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/needscoffee/32/1076_2.png) [@needscoffee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/needscoffee)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2020, 9:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474/668 "2020-09-07T21:40:31Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> No, the _certain belief that there are none_ is a matter of faith, not knowledge, and thus, comes under 'superstition" by that posters definition of faith = superstition.

Is not believing in ghosts a “superstition”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2020, 9:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474/669 "2020-09-07T21:46:40Z")

</div>

"I have never seen a ghost, thus I find their existence extremely doubtful, given all the research done. " =Science, not superstition.

“I know Ghosts cant exist, they are outside my belief system” = faith- and thus by HIS definition, superstition.

**LSLGuys** definition of any faith is “silly superstition”, remember that.

Thus faith , a belief that there are no ghosts=silly superstition.

Now, I dont think all faith is a silly superstition. But _if_ you go by his definition, then a belief backed by faith , even if that is Atheistic =silly superstition.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_other_waldo_pepper/32/12370_2.png) [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Other_Waldo_Pepper)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2020, 9:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474/670 "2020-09-07T21:57:02Z")

</div>

I don’t believe Mondale got elected president in 1984.  
I don’t believe you’re a super-powered Kryptonian.  
I don’t believe I’m married to multiple wives.

Do any of those involve superstitious faith?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2020, 9:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474/671 "2020-09-07T21:57:40Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> No, the _certain belief that there are none_ is a matter of faith, not knowledge, and thus, comes under 'superstition" by that posters definition of faith = superstition.
> 
> Agnosticism is lack of belief. Atheism is a belief that there are no gods.

You know, it is kind of offensive for you to tell atheists that they are wrong about our definition of our position. Gnostic is knowledge. theism is belief. Atheism is lack of belief.  
This may include a provisional belief that there are no gods, due to lack of good evidence for any and plenty of evidence against many gods - not to mention that some have self-contradictory definitions.  
I suggest you call an atheist show and tell the hosts how they don’t know their position. You’ll get your ass handed to you.  
BTW I don’t believe that there are no gods in a galaxy 100 million ly from us. I lack belief in any such gods, but without any evidence one way or another that’s as far as I can go.  
I’ve read Huxley, by the way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2020, 10:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474/672 "2020-09-07T22:02:25Z")

</div>

It is kind of offensive for someone to call fall faiths on Earth=silly superstitions.

“strong atheism” is certain knowledge, based on personal faith that there are no gods. Not my definition: “ **Positive atheism** , also called **strong atheism** and **hard atheism** , is the form of atheism that additionally asserts that no deities exist… " _Positive_ " atheists explicitly assert that it is false that any deities exist…”

[Negative and positive atheism - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_and_positive_atheism#:~:text=Positive%20atheism%2C%20also%20called%20strong,have%20appeared%20in%20George%20H).

Other versions of atheism are, IMHO, just forms of agnosticism.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2020, 10:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474/673 "2020-09-07T22:03:06Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> "I have never seen a ghost, thus I find their existence extremely doubtful, given all the research done. " =Science, not superstition.
> 
> “I know Ghosts cant exist, they are outside my belief system” = faith- and thus by HIS definition, superstition.
> 
> **LSLGuys** definition of any faith is “silly superstition”, remember that.
> 
> Thus faith , a belief that there are no ghosts=silly superstition.
> 
> Now, I dont think all faith is a silly superstition. But _if_ you go by his definition, then a belief backed by faith , even if that is Atheistic =silly superstition.

Your problem here is obvious. You are mixing up knowledge and belief. There is a big difference between saying “I know ghosts don’t exist” (for whatever reason) and saying “I believe no ghosts exist” because of lack of evidence and evidence against a soul or any mind outside a body.  
In 45 years of discussing atheism on line, I think I’ve run across one atheist who claimed to know that no gods exist. He was an idiot, in the opinions of the atheists on the newsgroup.  
We clearly can’t know no gods exist, since there are a near infinite number of possible gods.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2020, 10:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474/674 "2020-09-07T22:13:50Z")

</div>

From Footnote 5 of your link:

negative atheism, the position of not believing a theistic God exists" / “positive atheism: the position of disbelieving a theistic God exists”; p. 464: “Clearly, positive atheism is a special case of negative atheism: Someone who is a positive atheist is by necessity a negative atheist, but not conversely”.

Disbelief is not knowledge.  
Positive atheism in the ACA sense is definitely about doing good works to show atheists can and do good works. It has nothing to do with the definition. ACA programs are the ones I referenced. They explicitly reject atheism as a statement of knowledge since that would put the burden of proof on atheists, and because of the many inconsistent definitions of god it is impossible to disprove all of them.  
The wiki quote talks about assertions. I have no idea whether belief that there are no gods counts as an assertion, or if only a statement of knowledge that there are no gods counts as an assertion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thorny\_locust](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thorny_locust/32/431_2.png) [@thorny\_locust](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/thorny_locust)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2020, 10:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474/675 "2020-09-07T22:18:33Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> the _certain belief that there are none_ is a matter of faith

Define “God”.

And no, I am not nitpicking. We can’t possibly sensibly have this discussion unless we have a clear definition of what you mean by the word.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2020, 10:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474/676 "2020-09-07T22:19:22Z")

</div>

BTW, here is the first paragraph of the wiki article on atheism  
**Atheism** is in the broadest sense an absence of [belief](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belief) in the existence of [deities](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deity).[[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism#cite_note-encyc-unbelief-def-issues-1)[[2]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism#cite_note-oxdicphil-2)[[3]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism#cite_note-religioustolerance-3)[[4]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism#cite_note-4) Less broadly, atheism is a rejection of the belief that any deities exist.[[5]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism#cite_note-eb2011-atheism-5)[[6]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism#cite_note-encyc-philosophy-6) In an even narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities.[[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism#cite_note-encyc-unbelief-def-issues-1)[[2]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism#cite_note-oxdicphil-2)[[7]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism#cite_note-RoweRoutledge-7)[[8]]([https://en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org)

> /wiki/Atheism#cite\_note-8) Atheism is contrasted with [theism](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theism),[[9]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism#cite_note-reldef-9)[[10]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism#cite_note-OED-theism-10) which in its most general form is the belief that [at least one deity exists](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existence_of_God).[[10]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism#cite_note-OED-theism-10)[[11]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism#cite_note-11)[[12]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism#cite_note-12)

That sounds fairly reasonable to me. Note that the position there are no deities is different from the statement that I have knowledge that there are no deities. I can have the position that aliens exist somewhere in the universe without claiming I have knowledge of these aliens.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Trinopus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/2bfe46/32.png) [@Trinopus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Trinopus)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2020, 10:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474/677 "2020-09-07T22:21:40Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> Atheism is a belief that there are no gods.

For some, yes. For others, no. You’re re-defining the word improperly.

Also, as noted, we don’t have a definition of “God.” Some definitions that have been put forward over the centuries appear to be self-contradictory, and thus it does not entail “faith” to disbelieve in those.

You’re direly oversimplifying a situation that calls for more nuance and diversity than you are permitting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2020, 10:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474/678 "2020-09-07T22:22:36Z")

</div>

> [@thorny\_locust](#):
>
> Define “God”.
> 
> And no, I am not nitpicking. We can’t possibly sensibly have this discussion unless we have a clear definition of what you mean by the word.

Excellent. We can prove that the tri-omni god does not exist, due to contradictions in its definition, but the existence of the deistic god is unfalsifiable, and we certainly cannot its nonexistence.  
Maybe the real god lives beyond our event horizon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_other_waldo_pepper/32/12370_2.png) [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Other_Waldo_Pepper)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2020, 10:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474/679 "2020-09-07T22:24:22Z")

</div>

If someone asked me if I voted for Dole in ‘96, I’d normally say “no, I voted for Clinton.” But, if pressed by someone who went on and on about how memory can be unreliable and, hey, _man,_ how sure can you be about, like, _anything,_ y’know? — I’d grudgingly admit that, yes, technically, I only _believe_ that I voted for Clinton and not for Dole.

Is that description like unto superstition, or merely apt?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![needscoffee](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/needscoffee/32/1076_2.png) [@needscoffee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/needscoffee)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2020, 11:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474/680 "2020-09-07T23:56:33Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> It is kind of offensive for someone to call fall faiths on Earth=silly superstitions.
> 
> “strong atheism” is certain knowledge, based on personal faith that there are no gods. Not my definition: “ **Positive atheism** , also called **strong atheism** and **hard atheism** , is the form of atheism that additionally asserts that no deities exist… " _Positive_ " atheists explicitly assert that it is false that any deities exist…”
> 
> [Negative and positive atheism - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_and_positive_atheism#:~:text=Positive%20atheism%2C%20also%20called%20strong,have%20appeared%20in%20George%20H).
> 
> Other versions of atheism are, IMHO, just forms of agnosticism

That 3 people have broken down atheism as “strong” or “weak” based on a theoretical division is nonsense. I have never met a single atheist who hasn’t said that if evidence for a god presented itself, they’d believe it. Out of hundreds upon hundreds of atheists. Anybody can make a wiki page. It’s not a cite.

Pretending that “strong” atheism is a thing is what you use to justify your marginalization of atheists. You’ve been told countless times here that it’s not real. You choose to believe your own superstition about atheists. Congratulations.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [September 8, 2020, 5:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474/681 "2020-09-08T05:10:38Z")

</div>

Hardly three people. That is wikipedia, and if it was only three people in the world, it would be edited out by now.

When the facts are uncomfortable, attack the facts.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thudlow\_Boink](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thudlow_boink/32/320_2.png) [@Thudlow\_Boink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thudlow_Boink)\
**Post date:** [September 8, 2020, 2:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474/682 "2020-09-08T14:15:02Z")

</div>

And, here we go: Here on the SDMB, every thread about religion eventually devolves into a debate over the definition of atheism.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474.md?page=33)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-we-have-to-put-up-with-religious-people/917474.md?page=35)
