# Why does the United Negro College fund feel the need to lie so egregiously?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [June 7, 2009, 4:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018 "2009-06-07T16:15:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2009, 12:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018/121 "2009-06-08T00:06:32Z")

</div>

Neither of the patents that link mentions are now used or have ever been used, as far as I can tell… and in what language is “motor” a synonym for “refrigeration unit”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cisco](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ccd318/32.png) [@Cisco](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cisco)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2009, 12:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018/122 "2009-06-08T00:13:38Z")

</div>

I don’t know, I assumed it could have been some kind of motor for a cooling unit, but then again maybe not. Really, I’ve said multiple times you’re asking the wrong person. I posted the appropriate phone number if you want clarification.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Larry\_Borgia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/larry_borgia/32/156_2.png) [@Larry\_Borgia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Larry_Borgia)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2009, 12:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018/123 "2009-06-08T00:23:34Z")

</div>

BTW, in case my post #12 gave the wrong impression, I really don’t think the ad is that big a deal. It contains some pretty egregious exaggerations, but isn’t worth getting riled up about, IMO.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fantome](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/e9c0ed/32.png) [@Fantome](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fantome)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2009, 12:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018/124 "2009-06-08T00:27:42Z")

</div>

> [@Cisco](#):
>
> Because she probably really is 😉

Why do you believe that she is a racist and if the smiley is supposed to convey that you’re aware there’s no evidence of it, why do I deserve an apology any more she does?

> [@](#):
>
> You never explained how I moved any goal posts. I’m not going to play guessing games with you.

**stpauler** explained it in post #85:

> [@](#):
>
> Paraphrasing here:  
> 1)You claimed the NYT check their ads prior to publishing.  
> 2)I showed proof from a SCOTUS decision which showed they don’t.  
> 3)Then you claimed that the NEW NYT editors would not do such a thing.

Is it still over your head or would you like me to break it down even further for you?

> [@](#):
>
> Sorry pal, that’s not how it happened and you know it. I said:
> 
> > [@](#):
> >
> > You’re reading it as literally and as antagonistically as possible, because you just want to argue. I’m sorry I questioned your motives for wanting to argue, but that you just want to argue is clear.
> 
> And you ignored that and responded to the rest of my post with snarky argumentative one-liners.

You aplogized- i responded to some of your quotes with this:

> [@](#):
>
> Where? It says no such thing.

> [@](#):
>
> Lets’ not.

In your next response to me you called me an argumentative prick.  
How is what I said “not how it happened”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Contrapuntal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e274bd/32.png) [@Contrapuntal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Contrapuntal)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2009, 12:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018/125 "2009-06-08T00:32:02Z")

</div>

> [@Cisco](#):
>
> Here: [Frederick McKinley Jones](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_McKinley_Jones) had several patents involving engines and refrigeration units (“motors”.) The ad gets less and less nefarious.

Nevertheless, his mind is not responsible for “the motor,” or anything remotely like that. If they meant to say that an African American “held several patents …” why not just say so? What the hell is so hard about speaking the plain truth?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fantome](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/e9c0ed/32.png) [@Fantome](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fantome)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2009, 12:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018/126 "2009-06-08T00:32:52Z")

</div>

> [@Cisco](#):
>
> Frederick McKinley Jones had several patents involving engines and refrigeration units (“motors”.) The ad gets less and less nefarious.

Nope. The ad says that a motor is an innovation and that it came from the mind of an African American. That’s bullshit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aruvqan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aruvqan/32/2891_2.png) [@aruvqan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/aruvqan)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2009, 12:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018/127 "2009-06-08T00:37:26Z")

</div>

> [@Cisco](#):
>
> No it’s not, IMO. An African American woman made the first synthetic hair brush along with other innovations. She is responsible for innovations that resulted in the hair brush as we know it today.

OK, I happen to use a wooden comb [boxwood, got it at an SCA event and it reproduces one found at Birka] and a fuller brush where the handle is wooden and it is boars bristle. So mine wasn’t “innovated” by a black person?

Actually, ask me if I give a flying fuck what color anybody in particular is?:rolleyes:

we got geniuses and idiots that are black, white, yellow and brown [and every genetic combination between] so again, why should I give a fuck what race anybody is? They are all HUMAN. If I can crossbreed with them, they are human [if i wasnt unable to reproduce without a lot of medical assistance that is]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![StusBlues](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/dc4da7/32.png) [@StusBlues](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/StusBlues)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2009, 1:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018/128 "2009-06-08T01:04:02Z")

</div>

> [@Cisco](#):
>
> Or maybe _the editors of the New York Times_, to whom I lend a lot more respect and authority than sdmb poster Carol Stream, did not find it to be fraudulent, etc.

Asinine reasoning. By your logic, anyone who disagrees with _Times_ on anything must be wrong. This is demonstrably untrue.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![StusBlues](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/dc4da7/32.png) [@StusBlues](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/StusBlues)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2009, 1:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018/129 "2009-06-08T01:07:52Z")

</div>

> [@Cisco](#):
>
> Here: [Frederick McKinley Jones](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_McKinley_Jones) had several patents involving engines and refrigeration units (“motors”.) The ad gets less and less **nefarious**.

“You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.”

Honestly, I think the thrust of this thread is that a more honest ad - highlighting the numbers of people who have been helped by the College Fund and their subsequent accomplishments instead of spreading urban legends - would be more effective.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![E-Sabbath](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/e19adc/32.png) [@E-Sabbath](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/E-Sabbath)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2009, 1:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018/130 "2009-06-08T01:43:40Z")

</div>

Well, it’s too late to call now. Anyone wanna call tomorrow?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dorothea\_Book](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/da6949/32.png) [@Dorothea\_Book](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dorothea_Book)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2009, 1:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018/131 "2009-06-08T01:57:26Z")

</div>

> [@stuthehistoryguy](#):
>
> “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.”
> 
> Honestly, I think the thrust of this thread is that a more honest ad - highlighting the numbers of people who have been helped by the College Fund and their subsequent accomplishments instead of spreading urban legends - would be more effective.

**stuthehistoryguy** , I’m not sure how much of this thread you’ve actually read but I’m pretty sure that if the OP had been anything near as civil to what you just wrote we would not all be in the BBQ Pit now. **Cisco** didn’t, I think, expend all that energy by way of saying the ad is perfect. AFAICT his view is that the ad is defensible and shouldn’t be called lying. He sees the use of the word “innovation” as disclaiming a stronger title to invention and, still less, sole invention. Others disagree.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sigmagirl](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c89c15/32.png) [@Sigmagirl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sigmagirl)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2009, 2:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018/132 "2009-06-08T02:06:42Z")

</div>

> [@Fantome](#):
>
> Do you have a good reason to believe that the NY Times editors “look at their ads” any more closely today than 45 years ago?

Editors do not ever look at ads before publication. The advertising and editorial departments of newspapers are completely separate for ethical reasons. The advertising managers might have scrutinized the text of the ad more carefully, and asked the advertiser to clarify and justify it, but the editorial staff has no more business looking at advertising than an advertising salesperson has writing a news story.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Isamu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/7c8e57/32.png) [@Isamu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Isamu)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2009, 2:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018/133 "2009-06-08T02:11:28Z")

</div>

> [@Cisco](#):
>
> Where? What am I missing? Show me. I’ve already pointed out twice that the list says innovation. Argent Towers says invention.

The quoted list uses the term “innovation” in a disengenuious way. An aluminium cooling system for an internal combustion engine to replace a rubber cooling system is an innovation. The internal combustion engine is an invention.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Contrapuntal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e274bd/32.png) [@Contrapuntal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Contrapuntal)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2009, 2:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018/134 "2009-06-08T02:17:52Z")

</div>

> [@Dorothea\_Book](#):
>
> He sees the use of the word “innovation” as disclaiming a stronger title to invention and, still less, sole invention. Others disagree.

Mainly because it uses the word “innovation” to describe what are, for the most part, inventions, and uses the word “responsible” to describe the relationship of certain minds to said innovations, and does so when it would have been an act of purest simplicity to describe those things in plain language that left little room for doubt.

When an advertisement plays fast and loose with the truth it’s a safe bet that someone is trying to pad the stats, so to speak.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![StusBlues](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/dc4da7/32.png) [@StusBlues](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/StusBlues)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2009, 2:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018/135 "2009-06-08T02:19:34Z")

</div>

> [@Dorothea\_Book](#):
>
> **stuthehistoryguy** , I’m not sure how much of this thread you’ve actually read but I’m pretty sure that if the OP had been anything near as civil to what you just wrote we would not all be in the BBQ Pit now. **Cisco** didn’t, I think, expend all that energy by way of saying the ad is perfect. AFAICT his view is that the ad is defensible and shouldn’t be called lying. He sees the use of the word “innovation” as disclaiming a stronger title to invention and, still less, sole invention. Others disagree.

I read the whole thing. If you recall, the list of devices in the OP began with:

_A mind is responsible for…_

and concluded with:

\*Indeed, it’s time to stop and celebrate the fact that each and every one of the wonderful innovations mentioned here came from the mind. The mind of an African American. \*

The text does not specify innovations in the \*design \*of each device. The implication is that each device was in itself an innovation from the mind of an African American. Given the devices listed, this is patently absurd, and absolutely qualifies as lying, especially when printed in the _Times_. You might let a junior high student slide on this, but not a national organization. Indeed, the text as written actually \*\*downplays \*\*legitimate accomplishments by lumping them in with more specious claims. This cannot be denounced in strong enough terms.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Moirai](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/96bed5/32.png) [@Moirai](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Moirai)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2009, 2:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018/136 "2009-06-08T02:30:34Z")

</div>

I am picturing the marketing meeting where this stuff was discussed- the careful avoidance of the word “invented,” the assurances that words like “innovations” and “innovated” would ensure that no one could pin them down on anything…

Sweet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ogre](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/ecb155/32.png) [@Ogre](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ogre)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2009, 2:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018/137 "2009-06-08T02:35:03Z")

</div>

This entire thread is…shrill. Deafeningly shrill. Ick.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![stpauler](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9d8465/32.png) [@stpauler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/stpauler)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2009, 2:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018/138 "2009-06-08T02:38:15Z")

</div>

> [@EJsGirl](#):
>
> I am picturing the marketing meeting where this stuff was discussed- the careful avoidance of the word “invented,” the assurances that words like “innovations” and “innovated” would ensure that no one could pin them down on anything…
> 
> Sweet.

Check out [this post](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=11220196&postcount=107)where I linked to the time where they did use “invented”. Whoops!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Green\_Bean](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/green_bean/32/1760_2.png) [@Green\_Bean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Green_Bean)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2009, 2:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018/139 "2009-06-08T02:47:35Z")

</div>

**Cisco** –Put down the shovel, dude.  
The stupidest thing on that list: Food preservation.

Excuse me?

_FOOD PRESERVATION???_

Food preservation doesn’t just predate Americans. It predates Africans. It predates cavemen. It predates humans. _Animals_ find ways to make their food last longer, for god’s sake.

“Food preservation” isn’t “an innovation.” There have been many innovations in food preservation over the years, but the concept and the practice of extending the time before food becomes inedible is not “an innovation.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2009, 2:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018/140 "2009-06-08T02:50:14Z")

</div>

Yep – you mean like when my cats try to bury their food, to save it for later? Or squirrels storing nuts for winter?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018.md?page=6)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-does-the-united-negro-college-fund-feel-the-need-to-lie-so-egregiously/499018.md?page=8)
