Although I-69 may change that a bit…
I disagree… I think “taste of chocolate” had it right,
I have to say that having it get light later in the morning and stay light later in the evening is much much more pleasant. Otherwise the birds start waking you up around 3:30 in the morning…
And I have to disagree about it taking 30 days to get used to daylight saving time. Since it happens over a weekend when I don’t have to be up for work, etc., it usually takes me about 1-2 days to adjust.
And it’s only 1 hour here, folks. Not much different than going to bed early and getting up early a couple days in a row.
HOWEVER, I do like the idea Critical1 had,
Now, wouldn’t that solve all the problems?? Except for being 1/2 hour off from every other country in the world…except, what is it, one area of New Zealand, that’s always x hours and 30 minutes different than everywhere else?
Could we have a reputable citation for this?
And the Northern Territory, Australia; South Australia, Australia; Norfolk Island, Australia; Lord Howe Island, Australia; Afghanistan; India; French Polynesia-Marquesas Islands; Burma; Newfoundland, Canada; and Iran.
Just a note on the other states with divided time zone issues:
In Kansas, those counties in the western part of the state are sliced off into Mountain time because they are economically more dependent on Denver/Colorado Springs than on Eastern Kansas. Oregon counties in Mountain time are linked economically to Boise, Idaho. By contrast, the panhandle of Idaho is economically linked to Spokane and the Columbia River basin, so that part is chopped off and put in Pacific. El Paso, Texas is naturally lumped with New Mexico, rather than the rest of Texas.
More difficult to establish the rationale for are states chopped in half. In the case of the northern plains states, the line appears to be an arbitrary determination as to where it makes more sense to reckon time based on 105 degrees west longitude than on 90 degrees west longitude. Kentucky and Tennessee appear to slice off their Appalachian portions for Eastern time, leaving the flatter river plains to Central.
The western Florida panhandle is put with Alabama presumably on the basis that they are tied together.
daylight savings and accident rates
http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/moments/s689016.htm
http://www.mcmaster.ca/inabis98/occupational/coren0164/two.html
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/339/16/1167
http://www.selfhelpmagazine.com/articles/holidays/daysave.html
I couldnt find the info on adjusting to a new sleep pattern, the best I could find was all on jet lag and usually said a week or less.
either way, the accident rate is real and basicly equates to people getting injured and even dying over something thats just weird to even contemplate. I have a hard time justifying the benifits of daylight savings vrs the hassle it creates. my 30 min solution gives most of the benifits with none of the problems at all.
The third citation you provided, from the New England Journal of Medicine, disputes the claim of the Coren study, in the first citation, that accidents rates increased with Daylight Saving (not Savings) Time.
I got news for you… the birds are waking you up at the same time whether you change your clocks or not. If you are on a quest for extra hours of daylight, you have my permission to get up one hour earlier and enjoy the sunshine before work. You can work regular work hours and still enjoy the same amount of daylight. I can keep my same sleep patterns. It would all be nice and voluntary, not mandated like the totalitarian decree it is now.
The “energy savings” from daylight saving are all based on obsolete data. I defy you to show me that with modern energy use patterns there is any saving.
And from my personal experience, I can tell you that work time is lost. I have never been at a job that didn’t have at least one person show up an unusual amount of time late one or two days in the first week.