Why don't the Harry Potter books feel like fantasy novels?

Oh, dear Og, don’t judge Buffy by it’s first season. If you’re going to try it, go ahead and commit to the first two seasons. The first one is like Joss Whedon learning to drive a manual transmission: a lot of hunting around to find gears, not much getting where he wanted to go.

Isn’t that true in LOTR (and The Hobbit even more) as well? Shire hobbits, who are our POV characters, know very little of magic, or of the conflicts, wars and other dangers that afflict the rest of Middle Earth, and not much, even, of non-hobbit peoples, such as elves, orcs, dwarves, or even men. We readers learn about these things at the same time as as Bilbo, Frodo, Merry, Pippin and Sam lean about them.

Interesting, of all the shows I named the only ones I liked where Pushing Daisies or Dead Like Me and Buffy was OK, Highlander could be watched if nothing else was on. I very strongly think you will like some of the better Urban Fantasy books.

I forgot to ask about Northern Exposure, it made magic or supernatural nearly invisible in a quirky hour long dramedy, it you liked Northern Exposure, Charles DeLint’s early works will probably work for you.

I think I’ve read that book. :smiley:

I love the Lord of the Rings, but the non-humans outnumber the human characters by far and I understand why Rodgers01 wouldn’t like it if he doesn’t like fantasy books. I mean it is effectively the basis of the entire genre of High Fantasy with a large influence of Sword & Sorcery and all D&D inspired fantasy.

Yeah. Tolkien’s work really went downhill when he let Gentry Lee start co-authoring.

Truth in composition: I originally wrote “Geddy Lee,” looked at it and said, “That ain’t right,” and had to go look up Gentry Lee’s name.

Errrgghh. Okay, two seasons it is.

I was young when I saw it, but I did love Northern Exposure! I had almost forgotten that there was sometimes a magic/supernatural element. But you got that right, and you also liked Pushing Daisies, so you seem to have tapped into my fantasy-tolerant vein. I’ll add Charles DeLint to my reading list - thanks!

Low fantasy vs High fantasy. In low fantasy, a barbarian swordsman can chop an immortal necromancer in half with one shrug of his steely muscles. In high fantasy an immortal necromancer can wither a barbarian swordsman into ash with one twitch of his skeletal finger.

Well, to be fair, Rush did do some pretty Tolkien-esque stuff back in the '70s. :smiley:

(though that was Neil, not Geddy. Geddy just sang it.) :slight_smile:

At their core they are really about solving mysteries.
And give J.K. credit for writing suspenseful page turners. You can’t finish a chapter without wanting to read the next and when the book is done you need another.

Well said.
Life around them goes on pretty much as normal but a little trouble has come looking for them so they have to fend for themselves.

Yes. Credit where credit is due, absolutely.

Another thing she excels at is working in the appropriate amount of backstory in a smooth and effortless manner. Each book after the first recaps what has gone before so quickly as to not bore the people who’ve read the previous books 50 times, yet without giving so little detail that newcomers are completely left in the dark.

OneCentStamp:

They were prepared with a handful of basilisk fangs to destroy it. Crabbe might have inadvertently taken care of the problem before they got to do it themselves, but they didn’t NEED him and his heretofore-never-revealed spell in order to fulfill their mission.