# Why Guns?

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872
**Category:** Great Debates
**Created:** [March 14, 2001, 12:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872 "2001-03-14T00:07:04Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Helen\_s\_Eidolon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/8edcca/32.png) [@Helen\_s\_Eidolon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Helen_s_Eidolon)
#### Post date: [March 14, 2001, 12:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872/1 "2001-03-14T00:07:04Z")

</div>

Sorry to drop in another gun thread, but I don’t think this question really fits in with any of the others open right now.

Why do we feel the need for a right to carry guns?

With the exception of rifles and other such guns (I admit, I don’t know much about guns in general) which are used for hunting, guns (such as handguns) are made to kill people.

So why do people actively want stuff around that is made solely to kill people?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![minty\_green](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f6c823/32.png) [@minty\_green](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/minty_green)
#### Post date: [March 14, 2001, 12:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872/2 "2001-03-14T00:12:31Z")

</div>

‘Cause sometimes there’s people who need a little killin’.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![David\_B](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/51bf81/32.png) [@David\_B](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/David_B)
#### Post date: [March 14, 2001, 12:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872/3 "2001-03-14T00:20:37Z")

</div>

Because they are viewed as equalizers. The little old lady stands no chance against the thug – unless she’s got a gun (I used to have a number of articles about just this topic – little old ladies who fought off intruders this way, but I lost them in a 'puter switch a few years ago).

Some people also believe they need guns to protect them against the potential for a tyranical government.

Yes, they are made to kill people, but the vast majority of those who want respect for the right to keep and bear arms want it for defensive purposes. Sometimes you have to kill when it comes to defending yourself.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MusicJunkie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/df788c/32.png) [@MusicJunkie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MusicJunkie)
#### Post date: [March 14, 2001, 1:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872/4 "2001-03-14T01:04:33Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> With the exception of rifles and other such guns (I admit, I don’t know much about guns in general) which are used for hunting, guns (such as handguns) are made to kill people.
> 
> So why do people actively want stuff around that is made solely to kill people?

Because sometimes killing people is not wrong in all circumstances, sometimes it’s a nescssity or even a positive action. They can guarantee personal protection against attackers and on abroader scalle against oppressive governments.

Also they give a great **sensation** of security and power. Also, we can’t forget about the glamour of having a gun, like, don’t know, 007 maybe?🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![DoctorJ](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/doctorj/32/2904_2.png) [@DoctorJ](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DoctorJ)
#### Post date: [March 14, 2001, 1:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872/5 "2001-03-14T01:09:54Z")

</div>

Why guns? What the hell else are we supposed to use to shoot people?

Dr. J

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MusicJunkie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/df788c/32.png) [@MusicJunkie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MusicJunkie)
#### Post date: [March 14, 2001, 1:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872/6 "2001-03-14T01:22:33Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Why guns? What the hell else are we supposed to use to shoot people?

Well, canons usually get the job done.🙂 Also if we are to forget about guns, what about swords and bows&arrows, a lot more nice to the eyes and spirit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![David\_B](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/51bf81/32.png) [@David\_B](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/David_B)
#### Post date: [March 14, 2001, 1:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872/7 "2001-03-14T01:43:41Z")

</div>

Crossbows don’t kill people.  
People kill people.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MusicJunkie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/df788c/32.png) [@MusicJunkie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MusicJunkie)
#### Post date: [March 14, 2001, 2:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872/8 "2001-03-14T02:00:43Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Crossbows don’t kill people.  
> People kill people

Yes, but as [this site](http://www.synicon.com.au/sw/ls/sabres.htm) proves swords are responsible for thousands of children deaths every year.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Helen\_s\_Eidolon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/8edcca/32.png) [@Helen\_s\_Eidolon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Helen_s_Eidolon)
#### Post date: [March 14, 2001, 2:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872/9 "2001-03-14T02:02:48Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Because sometimes killing people is not wrong in all circumstances, sometimes it’s a nescssity or even a positive action. They can guarantee personal protection against attackers and on abroader scalle against oppressive governments.

How about an example for each, with no guns in the equasion at all?

While I suppose there is SOME validity in the equalizing theory, it still doesn’t pass muster with me. Don’t you think guns are used more to commit crimes than to prevent them? I’d really like to give you a cite (and find out for sure for myself) but I’m outta time and still not very good at finsing them, I’ll come back to it later.

And I never said anything about crossbows. I am definitely pro-crossbow! 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MusicJunkie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/df788c/32.png) [@MusicJunkie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MusicJunkie)
#### Post date: [March 14, 2001, 2:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872/10 "2001-03-14T02:03:47Z")

</div>

Damm, it should read crossbows not swords!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Monster104](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c6cbf5/32.png) [@Monster104](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Monster104)
#### Post date: [March 14, 2001, 2:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872/11 "2001-03-14T02:05:48Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> **Well, canons usually get the job done**

Canonization can kill someone? 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MusicJunkie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/df788c/32.png) [@MusicJunkie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MusicJunkie)
#### Post date: [March 14, 2001, 2:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872/12 "2001-03-14T02:08:01Z")

</div>

I must be really stupid to post three times in a row but:

> [@](#):
>
> Don’t you think guns are used more to commit crimes than to prevent them?

Sure I do! But I also believe that a prohibition on guns would affect much more the law abiding citizens than the croocks. Meanwhile you’re defenseless.  
Just IMHO.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![tracer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tracer/32/20578_2.png) [@tracer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tracer)
#### Post date: [March 14, 2001, 2:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872/13 "2001-03-14T02:39:50Z")

</div>

LaurAnge wrote:

> [@](#):
>
> With the exception of rifles and other such guns (I admit, I don’t know much about guns in general) which are used for hunting, guns (such as handguns) are made to kill people.

Not quite.

Self-defense and military firearms are designed to _neutralize a threat_. They can accomplish this by incapacitating or knocking out a man as easily as they can by killing him. The problem is, with most weapons, the amount of force required to drop someone is almost as great as the amount of force required to kill someone.

Weapons designed _only_ to knock out or incapacitate (e.g. tasers or pepper spray) won’t work in many circumstances where a gun would – they have limited range, can only affect the target if they hit him in specific areas of the body, can be easily nullified by glasses/clothing, etc… If someone is charging at you with the intent of killing you or doing you great bodily injury, you may lack the time, training, presence of mind, and calm hands necessary to shoot pepper spray directly into his eyes. But a .357 magnum or 10 mm round will stop him cold, instantly, even if your aim is so pathetic that you only manage to shoot him in the arm or leg (the systolic shock waves from the bullet impact travel throughout his bloodstream).

If someone ever invents a weapon that _can_ incapacitate someone, reliably, without killing or seriously injuring him, every police force in the land will eventually adopt it. Many gun owners would also willingly trade in their .45 ACP for a _Star Trek_ phaser with a stun setting. But it hasn’t happened yet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![justwannano](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/7ab992/32.png) [@justwannano](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/justwannano)
#### Post date: [March 14, 2001, 2:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872/14 "2001-03-14T02:50:37Z")

</div>

Protection from someone that wants to do me,us,you, harm.

It is my opinion that banning guns will trigger a crime wave of enormous proportions.

Prove me wrong and I’ll give up my guns,maybe.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Zoff](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/6de8d8/32.png) [@Zoff](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zoff)
#### Post date: [March 14, 2001, 3:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872/15 "2001-03-14T03:04:19Z")

</div>

I have to take issue with the basic premise of your question. Guns are not “made to kill people.” They are made to shoot a projectile. That projectile can be aimed at a person or a target. Guns have no intent – they are inanimate objects. The vast, vast majority of guns have never been used to shoot at, much less kill, a person. I realize you want to understand more about guns, but understand that the your question used rhetoric that has been developed for a specific _political_ purpose.

Guns are often used in self-defense. Estimates vary from 1-4 million uses of self-defense (last I checked). One of the problems in establishing the frequency of self-defense uses is that they often involve a person merely brandishing a weapon to a would-be attacker, who then gets the Hell out of Dodge. Since there is no reportable incident, there is no hard statistic to measure, unlike a wounding or murder by a criminal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Turbo\_Dog](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ce73a5/32.png) [@Turbo\_Dog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Turbo_Dog)
#### Post date: [March 14, 2001, 3:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872/16 "2001-03-14T03:35:02Z")

</div>

For the same reason we have Freedom of Speech and Freedom of the Press.

The Right to Keep and Bear Arms was for a different time when there were kings and tyrants? Hey, that’s why we have the other rights too. To speak of and write about the government without fear of being beheaded. Get rid of one of the “old time” rights, then get rid of them all as they were all written in different times, and have no purpose in today’s world and are all being misinterpreted and misused.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Freedom](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/bc8723/32.png) [@Freedom](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Freedom)
#### Post date: [March 14, 2001, 3:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872/17 "2001-03-14T03:58:20Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by MusicJunkie \*  
> I must be really stupid to post three times in a row but:
> 
> > [@](#):
> >
> > Don’t you think guns are used more to commit crimes than to prevent them?
> 
> Sure I do\*\*

AHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!

I now understand the pain Collunsbury goes through in every race thread.

If you want to claim that guns are involved in more crime than crime prevention, I suggest you offer a cite.

**LaurAnge**

I would offer that you have a faulty premise in your op.

You assume that somehow you can close pandora’s box and make it as if guns never existed. The technology to make guns is fairly simple, there is no way to remove them from this world.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ExTank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/35a633/32.png) [@ExTank](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ExTank)
#### Post date: [March 14, 2001, 4:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872/18 "2001-03-14T04:26:11Z")

</div>

**Tracer:** I would _not_ “trade in” my .45, used for home defense, for a stunner/phaser.

I _would_ substitute a stunner/phaser for my .45, though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![SPOOFE](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c5a1d2/32.png) [@SPOOFE](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SPOOFE)
#### Post date: [March 14, 2001, 5:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872/19 "2001-03-14T05:05:11Z")

</div>

Why the hell would you want a _Star Trek_ phaser? They’re very unergonomically shaped, you’ll always be mistaking it for the TV remote (“oops, zapped another TV”), and they don’t have any way to aim them!

Now, a _Star Wars_ blaster rifle, with THEIR stun setting, would be MUCH better. And they look cooler, too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ExTank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/35a633/32.png) [@ExTank](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ExTank)
#### Post date: [March 14, 2001, 5:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872/20 "2001-03-14T05:26:58Z")

</div>

What?! This was multiple choice?

Dunno, **Spoofe** ; the ability to vaporize the evidence would seriously cut down on my storage rental fees and carpet cleaning bills. I’d definitely want one of the more classically pistol-shaped phasers from the original series or movies.

I wonder what it’d do to my electric bill, though?

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-guns/57872.md?page=2)
