No, you have not. You have said, “Where did I say ‘prefer’?” That’s not an answer.
You have pointed out the perceived inefficacy of rational discourse. That’s not an answer.
DO YOU PREFER THAT DEMOCRATS BEHAVE LIKE FOX NEWS COMMENTATORS?
If you refuse to answer this question, I will conclude that you simply don’t like to take a stand, but prefer cute useless answers. 
Specifically, My curling club. 
Really? You couldn’t parse what that answer means? Is reading for context not something they teach in Lawyer School? Well, okay, I guess I’ll give you a small hint, then:
It means “no.”
I know what curling is; I was a little bemused at the idea that DSYoungEsq is in a club for it.
Nice. If I’m ever down that way I’ll bring my broom.
Please do! I don’t think I’m too far off in saying it’s probably one of the best clubs around. Of course, since there are a limited number of dedicated facilities in the South, that’s not that high a bar. But we do have a pretty good set-up. 
You’re on, and if you ever get up to the northeast, I shall try to arrange some Broomstones hospitality. The website for the upcoming Winter Olympics has some videos to explain the basics of the different events. The curling video includes a picture from my club.
I guess his foot didn’t hurt that much after all. He’s coming in just for a health care vote, and then scurrying away again to avoid the whole Russia thing.
What a trooper! Overcame great physical pain to participate in numerous Benghazi investigations and countless votes to repeal Obamacare, all for his sheer love of the country. And now we’re asking him to ignore the pain and investigate Russian subversion of our democracy- will the persecution of this patriot never end?
And this just in, as published on Crooks and Liars…
(quote shortened due a perverse fondness for ellipses)
Read it as you see fit, gist of it being that there were so few people who knew, it had to be Chaffetz in the library with the cell phone.
It’s official:
Farewell to Congressman Chaffetz. He’s been a true credit to the legislature, to the great state of Utah, and to order Rodentia.
Yes, it does. You can’t say that someone has done reprehensible things and pretend they aren’t evil. Reprehensible is not the same thing as “wrong.” It means something no good person could possibly condone.
You don’t even actually provide a counterargument. There’s no definition of evil. There’s no bringing up things Trump has done that aren’t evil. There’s just you calling it “shrill,” which means nothing, and then attacking liberals, as if that in anyway contradicts anything I said.
Trump is evil. He cares about himself only, and will harm anyone else in order to achieve his goals. That is what it means to be evil. Usually most politicians who are evil try to hide it. They are nice to other people, and pretend they care about them. But Trump is so bad he can’t even do that. He’s so evil that the basic concept of being nice to other people is beyond him.
As I often point out, he is a typical 80s villain. Others call him a Bond villain. What do those have in common? They’re villains. They bad guys. They are evil.
And I will continue to point this out to everyone until they listen. Because what actually convinces people more than anything else is just plain repetition. That’s cognitive science. It’s why Clinton lost–people just kept repeating bullshit about her. It didn’t matter how good her arguments were.