Because, as I have said elsewhere, a certain kind of liberal, when he has lost the argument, makes it personal, either with accusations of racism or as you have done.
It’s a gesture of surrender, and thus often useful in a debate.
I hate those guys. Almost as dearly as that certain kind of racist who, their racism exposed, crow that the mention of racism automatically hands them a rhetorical victory.
There is no way a liberal can lose an argument to a righty. That is unless you believe in a plutocracy, then their arguments are fit.
I do not see a bunch of people calling all rightys racists. But when the rightys lose an argument, they straight to that nonsense. I suppose if we read about a thousand threads on Obama, we could find a hint that would make a righty happy and think he has proved something. But it would take a lot of work.
But the fact is racists live in the Republican party and are a loud and serious part of the tea baggers.
Every Republican that believes that can start looking for a new job. There is simply no way we can continue to spend more than is taken in.
There’s nothing nutty about people demanding financial responsibility from their representatives. Nutty would be to ask them to do otherwise. Yesterday’s win in New York’s deeply held Democratic district demonstrates the dissatisfaction of Democrats as well.