# Why is a "cover version" so called?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-a-cover-version-so-called/189487>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [July 18, 2003, 10:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-a-cover-version-so-called/189487 "2003-07-18T22:37:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ximenean](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/aca169/32.png) [@Ximenean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ximenean)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2003, 10:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-a-cover-version-so-called/189487/1 "2003-07-18T22:37:55Z")

</div>

Because it “covers” the same musical ground as the original? Something to do with the record cover itself? Or am I missing something obvious?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Armilla](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e19b73/32.png) [@Armilla](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Armilla)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2003, 10:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-a-cover-version-so-called/189487/2 "2003-07-18T22:47:02Z")

</div>

I always figured it was something along the lines of “Same song, different cover”, a sort of cynical joke that they may as well just sell the sleeve empty as you’ve already got the music.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CurtC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ce73a5/32.png) [@CurtC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CurtC)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2003, 3:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-a-cover-version-so-called/189487/3 "2003-07-19T03:28:12Z")

</div>

How long has this term meant this? I’ve come across it only in the last year or so. I’m 42 now, so it seems pretty recent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JimOfAllTrades](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ba8739/32.png) [@JimOfAllTrades](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JimOfAllTrades)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2003, 3:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-a-cover-version-so-called/189487/4 "2003-07-19T03:53:40Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by CurtC \*  
> \*\*How long has this term meant this? I’ve come across it only in the last year or so. I’m 42 now, so it seems pretty recent. \*\*

Not quite _that_ recent. Among other meanings, my OED shows for the verb “cover”:

> [@](#):
>
> To make a cover version (cover n.1 1 f) of (a song, etc.).  
> 1965 L. Huntley Lang. Music Business 90 A phonograph record company is said to cover the recording of another phonograph record company when it releases a competitive recording of the same song.  
> 1975 R. S. Denisoff Solid Gold i. 10 Many acts popular in MOR…have made it a practice to ‘cover’ or copy the current hits in their more traditional styles.  
> 1977 Chapple & Garofalo Rock’n’Roll is here to Stay ii. 238 Mercury’s Georgia Gibbs covered Etta James’ ‘Wallflower’ with a cleaned up version called ‘Dance with Me Henry’.

So it goes back to the early 1960’s at the very least. For myself, I’ve heard (and used) it for quite a while. It seems to me that I remember it in fairly common use in my high school days, which were the early 1970’s.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gary\_T](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/3ec8ea/32.png) [@Gary\_T](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gary_T)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2003, 7:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-a-cover-version-so-called/189487/5 "2003-07-19T19:38:40Z")

</div>

I think you’ll find it goes back at least to the 50’s. During the seminal days of rock and roll, white artists often made cover versions of rhythm and blues recordings done by black artists. This was in the days when some considered rock and roll a tool of the devil, and white parents were aghast at the mere thought of their darlings being influenced by those sinister colored folks.

Common sense tells me the term evolved from the verb cover in the general sense of taking care of or including something. As in, “there’s a cool song that we can’t play on our station because the artist is black, let’s get it performed by a white artist.” When that song was so recorded, it was covered.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![doctordoowop](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ecc23a/32.png) [@doctordoowop](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/doctordoowop)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2003, 12:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-a-cover-version-so-called/189487/6 "2003-07-20T00:19:59Z")

</div>

As a college deejay,I know this has been around since the 50’s. The biggest culprits were Pat Boone, Georgia Gibbs, & the Crew Cuts. It was 99+& of the time whites stealing sales from blacks. Rarely did a black “cover " a white artist, but Otis Wiiliams & the Chams (black) covered Cathy Carr’s” Ivory Tower" & the Dubs covered the Skyliners. Unfortunately, the word has been misused so much that now it seems to mean remake. But at the time the Beatles REMADE Twist & Shout & Please Mr Postman etc etc, didn’t cover them. Cover meant to cover the market.  
GaryT, above ,summarizes the reasons for it. BTW, the only cover generally believed to be better than the original was the Diamonds’ “Little Darlin’”(Original by the Gladiolas).
