# Why is "ain't" a contraction? What's it a contraction of?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [January 31, 2013, 2:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911 "2013-01-31T14:13:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Grrr](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/grrr/32/146_2.png) [@Grrr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Grrr)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2013, 2:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911/1 "2013-01-31T14:13:27Z")

</div>

I’m not an “ain’t” hater. I often use the word myself.

What I do have a problem with is the fact that it’s spelled as a contraction. I refuse to do it! I just aint gonna write “aint” as a contraction.

Nope, aint gonna do it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wheelz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wheelz/32/5718_2.png) [@Wheelz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wheelz)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2013, 2:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911/2 "2013-01-31T14:20:36Z")

</div>

My understanding has always been that _ain’t_ stems from a lazy and/or dialectical pronunciation of\* isn’t\*, which of course\*\* is \*\*a proper contraction.

Replace the\* is _with_ ai\*,\* n’t\* continues to stand in for\* not\*, and Bob’s your uncle.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Earl\_Snake-Hips\_Tucker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/earl_snake-hips_tucker/32/3269_2.png) [@Earl\_Snake-Hips\_Tucker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Earl_Snake-Hips_Tucker)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2013, 2:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911/3 "2013-01-31T14:21:49Z")

</div>

[Ain’t](http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=ain%27t&allowed_in_frame=0)  
[Ain’t](http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ain't)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wheelz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wheelz/32/5718_2.png) [@Wheelz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wheelz)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2013, 2:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911/4 "2013-01-31T14:26:35Z")

</div>

Earl’s first link proves me wrong on the etymology, but the\* n’t _is indeed properly contracted from_ not\*, so I guess I ain’t totally stupid.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FrankJBN](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/f0a364/32.png) [@FrankJBN](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FrankJBN)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2013, 3:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911/5 "2013-01-31T15:27:43Z")

</div>

I am’t surprised to see origin.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AaronX](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/7bcc69/32.png) [@AaronX](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AaronX)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2013, 3:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911/6 "2013-01-31T15:41:10Z")

</div>

Are not nobody got time for that?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Inner\_Stickler](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/inner_stickler/32/318_2.png) [@Inner\_Stickler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Inner_Stickler)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2013, 3:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911/7 "2013-01-31T15:42:04Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> stems from a lazy

argh

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mascaroni](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/dc4da7/32.png) [@mascaroni](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mascaroni)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2013, 8:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911/8 "2013-01-31T20:29:52Z")

</div>

> [@FrankJBN](#):
>
> I am’t surprised to see origin.

Youse a Brummie?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TriPolar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tripolar/32/3008_2.png) [@TriPolar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TriPolar)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2013, 8:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911/9 "2013-01-31T20:34:52Z")

</div>

> [@FrankJBN](#):
>
> I am’t surprised to see origin.

I’d been told that it was originally a mispronunciation of _aren’t_. But wouldn’t the contraction of \*am not \*be _amn’t_?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chessic\_Sense](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/7c8e57/32.png) [@Chessic\_Sense](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chessic_Sense)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2013, 10:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911/10 "2013-01-31T22:11:19Z")

</div>

> [@TriPolar](#):
>
> But wouldn’t the contraction of \*am not \*be _amn’t_?

Not if you’re Cockney.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Asympotically\_fat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e47c2d/32.png) [@Asympotically\_fat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Asympotically_fat)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2013, 10:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911/11 "2013-01-31T22:32:15Z")

</div>

Can I add my own question: in the UK using “ain’t”, especially over-using it, is traditionally considered a sign of being very low class. However I remember reading a novel set around the early 19th century (though most of the details escape me). In it “ain’t” or “a’n’t” seemed to be used by young aristocrats as part of a fashionable speech. In the past was it more widely used (on a social scale that is) in the UK?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johanna](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johanna/32/8318_2.png) [@Johanna](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johanna)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2013, 10:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911/12 "2013-01-31T22:45:12Z")

</div>

> [@TriPolar](#):
>
> I’d been told that it was originally a mispronunciation of _aren’t_. But wouldn’t the contraction of \*am not \*be _amn’t_?

Only in Ireland.

_If anyone says that I amn’t divine  
He’ll get no free drinks when I’m making the wine_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Drake](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ad7895/32.png) [@Dr.Drake](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Drake)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2013, 11:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911/13 "2013-01-31T23:14:34Z")

</div>

> [@TriPolar](#):
>
> I’d been told that it was originally a mispronunciation of _aren’t_. But wouldn’t the contraction of \*am not \*be _amn’t_?

“Am not” \> “a’ not” \> “ain’t.” I don’t see why it couldn’t be “am I not” \> “a’ I n’t”. OED has a few suggestions. One is that if “isn’t” loses the -s-, then the i- lengthens to the pronunciation as in “night”, and goes to “ain’t” from there. Another is that it’s from and R-less “aren’t,” in other words a variant of British / US Southern “ahn’t” (as you said above). In short, no one knows.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Leo\_Bloom](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/leo_bloom/32/10377_2.png) [@Leo\_Bloom](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Leo_Bloom)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2013, 11:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911/14 "2013-01-31T23:20:54Z")

</div>

Brits say “et” for past tense of “eat,” although I don’t know often, or by what social class. Reason: they’re Brits.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2013, 1:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911/15 "2013-02-01T01:53:08Z")

</div>

One might as well ask how “won’t” comes to be the contraction for “will not”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ambivalid](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/a5b964/32.png) [@Ambivalid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ambivalid)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2013, 2:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911/16 "2013-02-01T02:51:29Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> One might as well ask how “won’t” comes to be the contraction for “will not”.

One might be wont to ask.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Francis\_Vaughan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/francis_vaughan/32/3093_2.png) [@Francis\_Vaughan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Francis_Vaughan)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2013, 3:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911/17 "2013-02-01T03:07:44Z")

</div>

plus bain’t — but I am not  
and tain’t — it is not

Bain’t doin’ tha, tain’t werf it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Patty\_O\_Furniture](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/96bed5/32.png) [@Patty\_O\_Furniture](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Patty_O_Furniture)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2013, 3:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911/18 "2013-02-01T03:57:52Z")

</div>

* * *

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mascaroni](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/dc4da7/32.png) [@mascaroni](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mascaroni)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2013, 3:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911/19 "2013-02-01T03:58:50Z")

</div>

> [@TriPolar](#):
>
> I’d been told that it was originally a mispronunciation of _aren’t_. But wouldn’t the contraction of \*am not \*be _amn’t_?

It is in parts of the West Midlands. It ain’t Down South. I’m not sure what Northern Hordes say…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2013, 4:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911/20 "2013-02-01T04:41:42Z")

</div>

_Ain’t ain’t a word  
And I ain’t gonna say it._

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-aint-a-contraction-whats-it-a-contraction-of/648911.md?page=2)
