# Why is Ayn Rand not taught in schools?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [July 1, 2014, 10:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078 "2014-07-01T10:30:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OneCentStamp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/13edae/32.png) [@OneCentStamp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OneCentStamp)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2014, 9:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078/101 "2014-07-02T21:31:17Z")

</div>

I read _Atlas Shrugged_ and _The Fountainhead_ in succession when I was a rather lost, flailing 23 year old. At the time, they served an important purpose in my development as a (I hope) person of reason and substance: they helped cure me of self-pity, self-deception, and wishful thinking. They almost certainly sped my exit from religion. They were the equivalent of a mental smallpox vaccination.

But to keep reading Ayn Rand, or try to model my life after her ideas any further than that, would be like taking daily smallpox shots: unpleasant, pointless, possibly harmful.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stringbean](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/d6d6ee/32.png) [@Stringbean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stringbean)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2014, 9:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078/102 "2014-07-02T21:35:41Z")

</div>

> [@MandaJo](#):
>
> I teach English to 11th graders in one of the top-ranked public high schools in the country. I’ve a pretty solid idea about how and what pulls out interesting and rigorous ideas from that set, as opposed to sound and fury.

And perhaps your discolored view of libertarian ideas is doing them a disservice?

In earnest: I’m sure you’re an excellent teacher and I applaud you for dedicating your life to education. It is my philosophy that part of educating is presenting objectionable views and letting young minds vet them out. Rand has, in my opinion, no shortage of quality debate fodder, though her writing is over-wraught and at times insufferable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Idle\_Thoughts](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/838e76/32.png) [@Idle\_Thoughts](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Idle_Thoughts)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2014, 9:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078/103 "2014-07-02T21:35:42Z")

</div>

> [@irae](#):
>
> And here I was just wondering what a vapid, partisan hack would have to contribute…

I don’t know who this is directed to, but if it’s directed to anyone on here, it’s a bit out of line. Don’t make posts like these about other posters again.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bldysabba](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ecccb3/32.png) [@bldysabba](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bldysabba)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2014, 10:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078/104 "2014-07-02T22:47:01Z")

</div>

> [@Green\_Bean](#):
>
> I enjoyed it enough to read it twice! (I skipped John Galt’s speech, though) I’ve also read The Fountainhead and Anthem. Her prose is objectionable and her philosophies are worse, but they made for some pretty good stories.

I also thought they were good stories. Atlas Shrugged and its ‘mystery’ pulled me in. The speech of course, I still haven’t read.

> [@](#):
>
> You’re correct that she was showing the seemingly inevitable result of communism, but I don’t think she showed anything “brilliantly.” She went so far overboard the whole thing ended up being laughable.

Why do you think she went overboard? Every socialist/communist economic system employed anywhere has failed miserably, and largely for the reasons she presents. This doesn’t validate everything she says of course, but it should get her some credit, which, of course, it doesn’t.

> [@](#):
>
> I think many people on this board understand what she was saying just fine.

That’s certainly not the impression I get from the people who show up to heap bile upon her in every thread that mentions her name. The only informed opinions come from those who are not spewing hatred. Go ahead, take a gander at the threads I linked to if you don’t believe me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Trinopus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/2bfe46/32.png) [@Trinopus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Trinopus)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2014, 11:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078/105 "2014-07-02T23:36:08Z")

</div>

> [@Green\_Bean](#):
>
> I enjoyed it enough to read it twice! (I skipped John Galt’s speech, though) I’ve also read The Fountainhead and Anthem. Her prose is objectionable and her philosophies are worse, but they made for some pretty good stories. . . .

Compadre! I also liked The Fountainhead. Okay, it had problems. Ellsworth Toohey was a cardboard caricature. But I think that Rand outgrew that kind of straw-man cartoonish writing, and was wise enough to do much less of it in Atlas Shrugged. In AS, it is the whole altruistic system of government that she attacks, and not some absurd “master villain” who is secretly behind it all.

And…in fact…I even managed to read John Galt’s 100 page speech without any real problems. I kept paper and pencil with me, and jotted down notes on the principal logical errors. It was entertaining, in a sad kind of way.

But AS, taken as a soap-opera novel, with big, flamboyant characters doing and saying dramatic things – well, it was really kind of fun!

“Who is John Galt? We are!” I loved that line!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dropzone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dropzone/32/7515_2.png) [@dropzone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dropzone)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2014, 11:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078/106 "2014-07-02T23:38:12Z")

</div>

> [@GuanoLad](#):
>
> When I was a teen it was _Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance_\*, which from its title I figured was some kind of a parody book. But no, it’s some kind of hippie philosophy thing.

And it contains next to nothing about motorcycle maintenance! Good thing he rode a BMW.

> [@JohnGalt](#):
>
> (I chose my user name before I read the book, so don’t blame me!)

So now the eternal question will not be answered, [Who is John Galt?](http://www.makestickers.com/cp/1127/who-is-john-galt--bumper-sticker) Because a bumper sticker I’ll read, but not a 200-page soliloquy. _Anthem_ was bad enough.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OneCentStamp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/13edae/32.png) [@OneCentStamp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OneCentStamp)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2014, 11:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078/107 "2014-07-02T23:39:09Z")

</div>

> [@Trinopus](#):
>
> “Who is John Galt? We are!” I loved that line!

“I am Galticus.”  
“I am Galticus.”  
“I am Galticus.”  
“I am Galticus.”  
“I am Galticus.”  
“I am Galticus.”  
“I am Galticus.”  
“I am Galticus.”  
“I am Galticus.”  
“I am Galticus.”  
“I am Galticus.”  
“I am Galticus.”  
“I am Galticus.”  
“I am Galticus.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MandaJo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ac91a4/32.png) [@MandaJo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MandaJo)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2014, 11:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078/108 "2014-07-02T23:55:45Z")

</div>

> [@Stringbean](#):
>
> And perhaps your discolored view of libertarian ideas is doing them a disservice?
> 
> In earnest: I’m sure you’re an excellent teacher and I applaud you for dedicating your life to education. It is my philosophy that part of educating is presenting objectionable views and letting young minds vet them out. Rand has, in my opinion, no shortage of quality debate fodder, though her writing is over-wraught and at times insufferable.

I’ve never said one thing about libertarian ideas. It’s just that to read _Atlas Shrugged_ in a way that made sure the kids had a deep enough understanding that their discussions weren’t facile, I’d have to give up like _All the Pretty Horses_, _The Tempest_, and “Benito Cereno”. The argument is not “Can Rand spark discussion?” The question is “Is it worth more than any of the other available options?” And I will tell you, I think any of the three works above can spark as deep and nuanced a discussion as Rand, and you have time to do all three of them–and so have a much wider range of discussion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Second\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/bbe5ce/32.png) [@The\_Second\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Second_Stone)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2014, 12:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078/109 "2014-07-03T00:30:54Z")

</div>

> [@bldysabba](#):
>
> That’s certainly not the impression I get from the people who show up to heap bile upon her in every thread that mentions her name. The only informed opinions come from those who are not spewing hatred. Go ahead, take a gander at the threads I linked to if you don’t believe me.

This is a woman who deliberately wrote books promoting evil in a way that is very influential on troubled young people. It would be akin to modeling your life after Holden Caulfield of _Catcher in the Rye_ and seeing everyone in the world as a phoney. Young people should be warned that this is dangerous bullshit that can stunt your emotional and intellectual growth if taken seriously, and turn one into a raging asshole. Libertarianism, by comparison, is harmless. So yeah, I pounce on the carcass of the Medicare and Social Security recipient hypocrite that was Ayn Rand whenever the occasion necessitates.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Trinopus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/2bfe46/32.png) [@Trinopus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Trinopus)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2014, 12:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078/110 "2014-07-03T00:43:36Z")

</div>

> [@OneCentStamp](#):
>
> “I am Galticus.” . . .

Misread that as “Galactus.” Please don’t eat my planet!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bldysabba](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ecccb3/32.png) [@bldysabba](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bldysabba)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2014, 12:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078/111 "2014-07-03T00:48:50Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Second\_Stone](#):
>
> This is a woman who deliberately wrote books promoting evil in a way that is very influential on troubled young people.

What about her books do you think is _evil_?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Nylock](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/77aa72/32.png) [@Mr.Nylock](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Nylock)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2014, 1:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078/112 "2014-07-03T01:30:20Z")

</div>

I think Rand is often misunderstood. The writing is pretty bad, but the ideas are interesting enough to make for some enjoyable reading. The philosophy is incomplete, and probably most of the people who read her stuff are what she would call “second handers.” I don’t think her philosophy promotes evil or anti-social behavior, but narcissists find her works very appealing. I’ve found that people who are very against Rand don’t really understand some of the basics of her philosophy. Basically, the worst thing about Rand for me is talking about Rand - it just makes me irritated and not liking anyone involved in the conversation - I end up thinking everyone is either stupid or a narcissist. But maybe that was her plan, like some sort of joker-like villain sent by the Russians to make Americans irritated with each other.

I just needed to get that off my chest. Don’t even get me started on Malthus . . .

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OneCentStamp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/13edae/32.png) [@OneCentStamp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OneCentStamp)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2014, 1:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078/113 "2014-07-03T01:33:38Z")

</div>

> [@Trinopus](#):
>
> Misread that as “Galactus.” Please don’t eat my planet!

Well, please just know that if Galticus ate your planet, it was the result of a voluntary trade of value for value, with no external coercion. The invisible hand of the free market lifted your planet into Galticus’ gaping maw.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mr.jp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/48db29/32.png) [@mr.jp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mr.jp)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2014, 2:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078/114 "2014-07-03T02:01:43Z")

</div>

Im going to defend Ayn Rand here, since she is the little guy in this context.

She presents a view, or a way of viewing the world. This way is not correct and does not have any nuance. But this also has a quality. If you want to consider and investigate a specific way of thinking, it’s better to do it in the concentrated, extreme mode. It’s clearer that way. And while she is not correct in her way of thinking, since obviously the world is way more nuanced than her abstract presentation, she does have a direction from which to critique other viewpoints in a meaningful manner.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Grestarian](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/grestarian/32/3227_2.png) [@Grestarian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Grestarian)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2014, 2:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078/115 "2014-07-03T02:08:14Z")

</div>

> [@F.U.Shakespeare](#):
>
> I contend that in any society that wants altruism to exist, children have to be taught it. Nobody needs to be taught selfishness - people are selfish by nature.

It seems to me Locke & Jefferson understood this but argued there was immediate and instant access to true market information for everyone, plus a healthy dose of benevolence and honesty, all balancing each other out to make things okay. Meanwhile, Marx understood it to be true and realized there was no benevolence and greed was reason enough to lie. I don’t remember if he believed true information was available to everyone, either, but certainly in modern times the ubiquity of advertising and PR and blatant disinformation does a lot to prevent any consumer from getting an accurate view of the market.

> [@F.U.Shakespeare](#):
>
> In Rand’s world, there’d be no teachers working for the modest rewards that universal education relegates to teaching. Instead, the top few teachers would get big bucks teaching the Rockefellers’ and Duponts’ kids, while society remained largely illiterate.

YOu mean like private schools, boarding schools, and the like? :dubious:

> [@F.U.Shakespeare](#):
>
> There’d be no war heroes (who, let’s face it, are working for chump change) - but we’d have plenty of highly paid mercenaries working for the highest bidder.

You mean like BlackWater (and whatever they’ve renamed themselves now)?:eek:

> [@elbows](#):
>
> (In apparent criticism of Panache’s summary) So…be wary of her supporters, and don’t listen to her detractors? And her views are defensible…

Sounds like a lot of religions! :smack:

–G!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![F.U.Shakespeare](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/aca169/32.png) [@F.U.Shakespeare](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/F.U.Shakespeare)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2014, 2:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078/116 "2014-07-03T02:42:15Z")

</div>

> [@Grestarian](#):
>
> You mean like BlackWater (and whatever they’ve renamed themselves now)?:eek:

That’s pretty much who I was thinking of. I’d be a little disappointed to see Neil Armstrong replaced by Dog the Bounty Hunter. YMMV.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dangerosa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/22d042/32.png) [@Dangerosa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dangerosa)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2014, 2:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078/117 "2014-07-03T02:42:41Z")

</div>

> [@mr.jp](#):
>
> Im going to defend Ayn Rand here, since she is the little guy in this context.
> 
> She presents a view, or a way of viewing the world. This way is not correct and does not have any nuance. But this also has a quality. If you want to consider and investigate a specific way of thinking, it’s better to do it in the concentrated, extreme mode. It’s clearer that way. And while she is not correct in her way of thinking, since obviously the world is way more nuanced than her abstract presentation, she does have a direction from which to critique other viewpoints in a meaningful manner.

Maybe, but does that view need to be taught in high school? We don’t teach ways of looking at the world in high school - we have a hard enough time teaching them how to use proper English, get them through two years of Algebra, and give them rudimentary Science and History. If we wanted to teach ways of thinking, Rand wouldn’t be the starting point.

Rand’s a little like Thoreau - some students will get exposed to Walden, most won’t. Thoreau is definitely worth reading, but not necessarily at the expense of other things and probably isn’t worth a forced slog through for high schoolers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![F.U.Shakespeare](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/aca169/32.png) [@F.U.Shakespeare](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/F.U.Shakespeare)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2014, 2:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078/118 "2014-07-03T02:47:15Z")

</div>

> [@Grestarian](#):
>
> Y(O)u mean like private schools, boarding schools, and the like? :dubious:

The teachers in these schools, were they raised in a Randian world? Or did they come from one of the societies that teach some form of altruism? Like pretty much, all of them?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Second\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/bbe5ce/32.png) [@The\_Second\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Second_Stone)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2014, 3:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078/119 "2014-07-03T03:59:55Z")

</div>

> [@bldysabba](#):
>
> What about her books do you think is _evil_?

Her promotion of selfishness as high morality. Duh.

Her prose and logic are less than adequate too, but that doesn’t rise to the level of evil.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bldysabba](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ecccb3/32.png) [@bldysabba](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bldysabba)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2014, 4:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078/120 "2014-07-03T04:29:50Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Second\_Stone](#):
>
> Her promotion of selfishness as high morality. Duh.

Can you expound on that? What do you think Rand means by selfishness?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078.md?page=5)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-ayn-rand-not-taught-in-schools/692078.md?page=7)
