# Why is it called a TV set if there is only one?

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-it-called-a-tv-set-if-there-is-only-one/213861
**Category:** Factual Questions
**Created:** [November 18, 2003, 6:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-it-called-a-tv-set-if-there-is-only-one/213861 "2003-11-18T06:39:54Z")
**Posts on this page:** 8
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mala](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/258eb7/32.png) [@mala](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mala)
#### Post date: [November 18, 2003, 6:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-it-called-a-tv-set-if-there-is-only-one/213861/1 "2003-11-18T06:39:54Z")

</div>

I know this seems like a silly question, but what does the ‘set’ in television set refer to?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![The\_Ryan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/7feea3/32.png) [@The\_Ryan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Ryan)
#### Post date: [November 18, 2003, 7:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-it-called-a-tv-set-if-there-is-only-one/213861/2 "2003-11-18T07:29:25Z")

</div>

I would assume it refers to the collection of devices which compose the TV (cathode ray tube, magnets, antenna, etc.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![DarrenS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/977dab/32.png) [@DarrenS](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DarrenS)
#### Post date: [November 18, 2003, 7:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-it-called-a-tv-set-if-there-is-only-one/213861/3 "2003-11-18T07:30:31Z")

</div>

It’s just one of the many meanings of “set” (which I believe is the word in the English language with the most meanings in the OED).

From [www-m-w.com](http://www-m-w.com):

> [@](#):
>
> Main Entry: 2set  
> Function: noun  
> 22 : an apparatus of electronic components assembled so as to function as a unit \<a television set\>

So perhaps the answer to your question is that “set” refers to the collection of components that make up the TV.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Grousser](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/9d8465/32.png) [@Grousser](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Grousser)
#### Post date: [November 18, 2003, 7:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-it-called-a-tv-set-if-there-is-only-one/213861/4 "2003-11-18T07:44:36Z")

</div>

Then we have a computer set, a videocassette recorder set, a dvd player set and a refrigerator set, among other sets. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![stuyguy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ec9cab/32.png) [@stuyguy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/stuyguy)
#### Post date: [November 18, 2003, 9:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-it-called-a-tv-set-if-there-is-only-one/213861/5 "2003-11-18T09:01:25Z")

</div>

Remember, TV was a direct descendant of radio. Hobbyists had radio (or “wireless”) “sets” that were a collection of distinct components: the battery(s) (often several jars of acid, not the small snap-in “dry cells” we all know today), the receiver, an antenna (another throwback monstrosity: often a clothesline-type affair), headphones, and – if you wanted to transmit too – a telegraph key. (Which brings up another point… I would not be surprised if radio borrowed the term “set” from the ye olde non-wireless telegraph, another arrangement that required many separate batteries and a key, at least.)

It’s no great leap that the lingo that described these early component radios stuck through the era of the all-in-one radio-in-a-box to the age of the TV-in-a-box.

The _real_ question, IMO, is whether “set” was introduced by early radio (or telegraph) practicioners to describe a collection of components (as in, “I have a new set of batteries”) or as a shorthand of the term “setup.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Earl\_Snake-Hips\_Tucker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/earl_snake-hips_tucker/32/3269_2.png) [@Earl\_Snake-Hips\_Tucker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Earl_Snake-Hips_Tucker)
#### Post date: [November 18, 2003, 1:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-it-called-a-tv-set-if-there-is-only-one/213861/6 "2003-11-18T13:10:52Z")

</div>

And to add just a little more, I remember from my high school French class that the French call a radio “poste de radio” and a TV “poste de television,” which I guess roughly translates to “radio set” and “television set.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)
#### Post date: [November 18, 2003, 2:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-it-called-a-tv-set-if-there-is-only-one/213861/7 "2003-11-18T14:02:31Z")

</div>

We forget these things were named a long time ago and terminological fashion changes.

As someone already pointed out, “TV set” was probably a derivitive of “radio set.” “Radio set” was coined somewhere around 1895 when Marconi built the first experimental transmitter & receiver that actually worked.

Read any book on any topic written around then and you’ll find a lot of language usage that sounds weird to our 21st century ears. Not undecipherable, just a little off. Someone from back then would be just as mystified at our language today.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![gotpasswords](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/c57346/32.png) [@gotpasswords](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gotpasswords)
#### Post date: [November 18, 2003, 5:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-it-called-a-tv-set-if-there-is-only-one/213861/8 "2003-11-18T17:18:55Z")

</div>

Way back whenever it was that TV was just starting out, the TV set truly was a set of boxes. The tuner section in the earliest sets was a converted radio receiver, adapted to handle video as well as sound. The picture tube and its high-voltage power lived in another box.
