# Why is Murder Illegal in the US?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [January 20, 2013, 5:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781 "2013-01-20T05:27:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2013, 10:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781/21 "2013-01-20T10:02:26Z")

</div>

> [@Boyo\_Jim](#):
>
> Or maybe I’m the one confused. I tend to think of rationality as somehow, vaguely, connected with morality. If there is no link, then one might say that to perform any act whatsoever is rational so long as one can state any arbitrary purpose for it. Perhaps “killing all readheads” is a rational explanation for killing a group of people, but that leaves me feeling… dissatisfied.

I think this is where you’ve gone wrong. “Rational” and “moral” are distinct concepts. If I want $20, and you have $20, and I kill you and take your $20, that was a rational solution to my problem of not having $20. On the other hand, if I kill you because I want you to stop beaming radio messages into my head, that’s not a rational solution to my problem, because you aren’t beaming anything into my head, and my actions not only do not resolve my problem, they’re entirely unrelated to my problem.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WhyNot](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/c77e96/32.png) [@WhyNot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WhyNot)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2013, 11:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781/22 "2013-01-20T11:21:17Z")

</div>

> [@Grumman](#):
>
> Because even if you can’t stop them the first time, making it illegal means you have the means to stop them doing it the second time. It’s a bit hard to murder someone if you’re locked up or dead, after all.

Yes, this. Murder is illegal so we can lock up, kill or medicate into a stupor those who do it. Which we do depends on why they murdered.

Which makes it very different from the current push to make all or more guns illegal, which is where I expect the OP is going with this, so I’ll just set up that straw man now. That one’s stupid, because not everyone who owns/uses a gun needs to be locked up, killed or medicated into a stupor, only those who use guns aggressively to terrorize or murder other people. Terrorism and murder are already illegal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Condescending\_Robot](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/a183cd/32.png) [@Condescending\_Robot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Condescending_Robot)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2013, 11:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781/23 "2013-01-20T11:28:09Z")

</div>

Murder is _inherently_ wrong, and, even if it’s not possible to stop all murders through the law, any functional society will still want the ability to punish those who have committed murder. This does not map on to “means to an end” laws such as, to pick a surely random example, laws against gun ownership.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UltraVires](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/ecccb3/32.png) [@UltraVires](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UltraVires)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2013, 2:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781/24 "2013-01-20T14:02:26Z")

</div>

> [@Condescending\_Robot](#):
>
> Murder is _inherently_ wrong, and, even if it’s not possible to stop all murders through the law, any functional society will still want the ability to punish those who have committed murder. This does not map on to “means to an end” laws such as, to pick a surely random example, laws against gun ownership.

Yes, and I believe that the OP is trying to make that false equivalency. The gun owner argument that he is playing off of is basically:

“If someone is going to commit murder, a crime punishable by death or life imprisonment, why would he care about violating a gun law which would prescribe a penalty far less than that?”

The analogy breaks down if there are no laws or punishments against gun possession OR murder.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2013, 2:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781/25 "2013-01-20T14:35:54Z")

</div>

Murder, by definition, is an illegal act. Perhaps the OP wants to ask: why is it illegal to kill someone? And the answer is: Sometimes it is, and sometimes it isn’t. Well, why is killing someone illegal sometimes? Answer: We are a country of laws. You can’t arrest someone for something unless there is a law against that something.

In societies that lack laws, there is still tradition and custom. Generally speaking, if you kill someone in those societies, you pay whatever price custom dictates. Whether that is exile, giving the family compensation, or marrying the dead guys widow. But custom and tradition can be interpreted different ways by different people.

I think most of us prefer the rule of law rather than the rule of man.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2013, 4:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781/26 "2013-01-20T16:47:23Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> There’s various tribes that haven’t developed laws, including laws against murder.

I am not sure that that is accurate.

I seem to recall from an ancient\* anthropology course that murder and incest are two actions that are prohibited in all societies. The definitions of murder and incest can differ in very wide scope, (OK to kill someone outside the tribe, but not inside the tribe; OK to expose a baby but not to smash the head of a three-year-old; royalty may marry siblings to keep the crown line “pure,” but commoners are not accorded the same rules; OK to marry paternal cousin but not a maternal cousin or the reverse, etc.), but all societies have a tabu against killing some people as variously defined.

- Meaning I took it in my youth, a very long time ago, not that it was a course specifically on prehistoric societies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Boyo\_Jim](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/87869e/32.png) [@Boyo\_Jim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Boyo_Jim)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2013, 5:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781/27 "2013-01-20T17:09:51Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> Murder, by definition, is an illegal act. …

I think this is the ultimate answer. Murder is against the law not as a deterrent, but as a means of defining just what exactly constitutes murder as opposed to another form of killing, and to spell out the penalties for committing murder. The common definition and penalty provides for some approximation of uniform justice within the society.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![virtually\_yours](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/a587f6/32.png) [@virtually\_yours](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/virtually_yours)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2013, 6:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781/28 "2013-01-20T18:11:11Z")

</div>

> [@IceQube](#):
>
> Why is murder illegal in the US?
> 
> I mean, if someone has the gall to murder someone, surely a few paragraphs of text won’t stop that someone from harming another person, right? :dubious:
> 
> What’s a law going to do to someone who’s probably crazy in the first place?

Murder as I understand it is non justifiable killing. if you kill somebody and are charged with murder, if they find out you acted in a way that you had no choice, you may be let free or lesser charges: manslaughter and different degrees of murder..  
Think of it that you did something to someone that they didn’t give you permission to do. If you take something from someone without their permission that is a universal crime which anyone knows by instinct without _laws_.  
Same as if you stick a needle in someone. when a doctor does it it is usually by consent or necessary. If someone comes to you and does it, it is a crime against the person. You didn’t give them permission. Same as murder you stuck a bullet in someone without their permission which resulted in the _taking_ or removal of their life from them without their consent. You STOLE from them so to speak. So without laws this is a universal crime against the person.  
Punishments/consequences were set to discourage inclined persons from doing this.  
vyVY

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Swords\_to\_Plowshares](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b38774/32.png) [@Swords\_to\_Plowshares](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Swords_to_Plowshares)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2013, 6:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781/29 "2013-01-20T18:21:32Z")

</div>

I honestly can’t believe this is a real topic. Y’all are getting your leg pulled.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RadicalPi](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/radicalpi/32/9806_2.png) [@RadicalPi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RadicalPi)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2013, 6:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781/30 "2013-01-20T18:34:45Z")

</div>

[MOSTLY IRRELEVANT DETAILS]

> [@ITR\_champion](#):
>
> All land on earth is claimed by some government other than Antarctica and a few islands too small for anyone to bother with.

Also unclaimed by anyone is the Bir Tawil Triangle. Neither Egypt or Sudan want it. [Bir Tawil - Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bir_Tawil)

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> I read once in _National Geographic_ about a people on a small island off the coast of India who are legally part of India, but are not really aware that India (or anyplace else) exists.

The people you’re thinking of are called the Senitelese, and they are aware that other people exist. They do, however, attack anyone who comes to visit them, so very few people bother anymore. [Sentinelese - Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentinelese_people)  
[/MOSTLY]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![42fish](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/4/b487fb/32.png) [@42fish](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/42fish)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2013, 11:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781/31 "2013-01-20T23:53:41Z")

</div>

> [@IceQube](#):
>
> Why is murder illegal in the US?

Because of the whole slippery slope problem:

“If once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination.” (Thomas de Quincey)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gracer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/8e7dd6/32.png) [@gracer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gracer)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2013, 12:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781/32 "2013-01-21T00:11:52Z")

</div>

> [@42fish](#):
>
> Because of the whole slippery slope problem:
> 
> “If once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and **procrastination**.” (Thomas de Quincey)

Ooooh, _that’s_ how I got here…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![R3d\_Anonymous](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/aeb1de/32.png) [@R3d\_Anonymous](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/R3d_Anonymous)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2013, 12:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781/33 "2013-01-21T00:18:58Z")

</div>

> [@IceQube](#):
>
> Why is murder illegal in the US?
> 
> I mean, if someone has the gall to murder someone, surely a few paragraphs of text won’t stop that someone from harming another person, right? :dubious:
> 
> What’s a law going to do to someone who’s probably crazy in the first place?

:rolleyes: Are you really this naive? The law threatens to execute or imprison people who commit murders. Isn’t this obvious?

I can’t believe this thread is serious.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![IceQube](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/dfb087/32.png) [@IceQube](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/IceQube)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2013, 2:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781/34 "2013-01-21T02:00:46Z")

</div>

Yes I was trying to propose a (false) equivalency here … in case anyone was wondering about my motivations. Anyway the resultant discussion(s) are very interesting … but my intent was to propose that equivalency, not ask whether murder is illegal in other places, or imply that murder is only illegal in the US.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Siam\_Sam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/d78d45/32.png) [@Siam\_Sam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Siam_Sam)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2013, 4:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781/35 "2013-01-21T04:27:12Z")

</div>

I never would have guessed your motivations, as I stopped following all the gun threads long ago.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LinusK](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/258eb7/32.png) [@LinusK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LinusK)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2013, 5:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781/36 "2013-01-21T05:57:41Z")

</div>

Jesus. I think this place has the most literal-minded people on the internet.

And the analogy works perfectly, because you’re attacking the _argument:_ that guns should be legal because a law wouldn’t stop people from owning guns.

Maybe they should be and maybe they shouldn’t, but the argument that they should be because people would own them anyway is dumb.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sisu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/df705f/32.png) [@sisu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sisu)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2013, 5:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781/37 "2013-01-21T05:58:48Z")

</div>

Love this board, just sayin’

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panaccione](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/94ad74/32.png) [@panaccione](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panaccione)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2013, 6:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781/38 "2013-01-21T06:27:20Z")

</div>

I’m gonna go out on a limb here and say if there were no consequences for murder, we’d probably see a lot more of it. So, in essence, Iceqube you’re wrong, homey.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![usedtobe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/ec9cab/32.png) [@usedtobe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/usedtobe)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2013, 6:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781/39 "2013-01-21T06:53:04Z")

</div>

> [@Condescending\_Robot](#):
>
> Murder is _inherently_ wrong, and, even if it’s not possible to stop all murders through the law, any functional society will still want the ability to punish those who have committed murder. This does not map on to “means to an end” laws such as, to pick a surely random example, laws against gun ownership.

There is no such thing as “inherently” separate and aside from a moral or legal (defined as “a set of rules governing people”) framework.

If I send 1000 newborns to a desert island with the means of growing and learning language but without any moral/legal/religious training, the society they develop may well consider murder acceptable.  
Hell, how many times has someone “gotten away with murder” quite literally? I remember a case in the Ozarks 30+ years ago - small town with small town bully who lived just outside town. Despised by everyone in town. One bright sunny day he was in town getting supplies; as he was loading his truck, somebody did the town a favor and used a shotgun as an eraser. There was no police force in the town, so it fell to the state police. Absolutely no one saw anything - middle of the day, on the main street. Nobody. The only person who objected was his widow who just lost her status, if not her income.  
Reading of boom towns in the old US west, the concept of “he had it comin’” seems to have been common.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UltraVires](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/ecccb3/32.png) [@UltraVires](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UltraVires)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2013, 6:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781/40 "2013-01-21T18:43:08Z")

</div>

> [@LinusK](#):
>
> Jesus. I think this place has the most literal-minded people on the internet.
> 
> And the analogy works perfectly, because you’re attacking the _argument:_ that guns should be legal because a law wouldn’t stop people from owning guns.
> 
> Maybe they should be and maybe they shouldn’t, but the argument that they should be because people would own them anyway is dumb.

See Post #24. The argument is not: “Laws won’t stop people from owning guns.” Many people want to obey the law, and a law against guns would keep them out of the hands of people who typically obey the law.

The argument IS that if you take person A who has no reservations about violating the most basic law of man, murder, which is punishable by death or life in prison, that same person will not be dissuaded in the least by violating a gun law which has a punishment considerably less than that.

Could you imagine one hypothetical person who would otherwise murder someone but say, “Gee, gun ownership is punishable by a ($500 fine/year in jail/$1 million fine/10 years in jail) so I had better not get a hold of that gun. My planned murder is cancelled.”?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-murder-illegal-in-the-us/647781.md?page=3)
