# Why is Obama slipping in the polls?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [October 31, 2008, 1:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423 "2008-10-31T13:38:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Enola\_Gay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/3ab097/32.png) [@Enola\_Gay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Enola_Gay)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2008, 1:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423/1 "2008-10-31T13:38:15Z")

</div>

I got a little nervous just now when I checked the [latest poll numbers](http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls/). Obama had an almost 8 point lead about a week ago and now the spread is down to 5.9. Why is he slipping? I heard on the news that they expected the race to tighten nearer to the election, but why would that be?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/qadgop_the_mercotan/32/83_2.png) [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qadgop_the_Mercotan)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2008, 1:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423/2 "2008-10-31T13:44:17Z")

</div>

[http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/10/todays-polls-1030.html](http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/10/todays-polls-1030.html) gives a pretty nice explanation about shifting findings from various polls, what’s probably real vs. what’s not.

Lots of other discussion there too about the reliability of polls and polling.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Captain\_Carrot](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f0a364/32.png) [@Captain\_Carrot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Carrot)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2008, 1:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423/3 "2008-10-31T13:44:40Z")

</div>

Keep in mind that RCP sometimes picks polls that favor McCain and excludes polls that favor Obama.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Enola\_Gay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/3ab097/32.png) [@Enola\_Gay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Enola_Gay)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2008, 1:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423/4 "2008-10-31T13:48:16Z")

</div>

> [@Captain\_Carrot](#):
>
> Keep in mind that RCP sometimes picks polls that favor McCain and excludes polls that favor Obama.

Didn’t know that. I thought they just took everyone’s polls and averaged them. Who do you think they are biased?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RealityChuck](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/realitychuck/32/195_2.png) [@RealityChuck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RealityChuck)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2008, 1:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423/5 "2008-10-31T13:49:11Z")

</div>

Since it’s the electoral votes that count, it’s better to see the individual state polls and how the electoral votes are allocated.

I’ve been watching three: [www.fivethirtyeight.com](http://www.fivethirtyeight.com), [www.electoral-vote.com](http://www.electoral-vote.com) (both liberal leaning) and [rove.com](http://rove.com) (quite the opposite). None have shown any changes in the electoral votes in the past week.

A change from 8 to 5.9 is within the margin of error and does not necessarily indicate any real change.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Enola\_Gay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/3ab097/32.png) [@Enola\_Gay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Enola_Gay)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2008, 1:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423/6 "2008-10-31T13:58:37Z")

</div>

RCPs [no toss up electoral map](http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/maps/obama_vs_mccain/?map=10)just changed too. A few days ago, they had Obama at 380-something and McCain was 150-something. Now they have Obama at 353 and McCain at 185.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2008, 2:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423/7 "2008-10-31T14:04:28Z")

</div>

> [@Enola\_Gay](#):
>
> Didn’t know that. I thought they just took everyone’s polls and averaged them. Who do you think they are biased?

I can’t speak to whether or not they are biased, but the fact that they don’t clearly disclose their methodology or weighting is a bit suspicious. At least, I couldn’t find it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2008, 2:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423/8 "2008-10-31T14:10:40Z")

</div>

When someone comes up with the factual answer to this question, I hope he or she will also tell us why the stock market does whatever it’s going to do today. 🙂

Seriously, there are lots of ideas people have about why you see these tiny fluctuations in the polls, but no one really knows why.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![What\_Exit](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/what_exit/32/10652_2.png) [@What\_Exit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/What_Exit)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2008, 2:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423/9 "2008-10-31T14:14:30Z")

</div>

[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/maps/obama\_vs\_mccain/](http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/maps/obama_vs_mccain/) shows that overall Obama is still doing very well and has a large lead in the electoral race.

Obama/Biden 311  
238 Solid 73 Leaning  
McCain/Palin 142  
127 Solid 15 Leaning  
Toss Up 85  
85 Toss Up

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Morgenstern](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f9ae1b/32.png) [@Morgenstern](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Morgenstern)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2008, 2:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423/10 "2008-10-31T14:28:11Z")

</div>

Intrade still claims Obama has 364 EV to McCain’s 174.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Simplicio](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c37758/32.png) [@Simplicio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Simplicio)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2008, 2:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423/11 "2008-10-31T14:50:31Z")

</div>

> [@Enola\_Gay](#):
>
> Didn’t know that. I thought they just took everyone’s polls and averaged them. Who do you think they are biased?

[Here](http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/09/real-credibility-problems.html) is a discussion at [fivethirtyeight.com](http://fivethirtyeight.com) about Clear Politics dropping and then picking up polls depending on which candidate they favor.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mks57](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b9bd4f/32.png) [@mks57](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mks57)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2008, 3:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423/12 "2008-10-31T15:38:09Z")

</div>

It’s not scientific, but I’ve noticed the same thing in many other elections. The spread between the candidates gets smaller as you near election day.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Morgenstern](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f9ae1b/32.png) [@Morgenstern](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Morgenstern)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2008, 3:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423/13 "2008-10-31T15:45:19Z")

</div>

If you’re still nervous, you might want to knock on wood and read the following article from [openleft.com](http://openleft.com)

[http://openleft.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=A784DE4A1330AEAD784ED48B9440540B?diaryId=9555](http://openleft.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=A784DE4A1330AEAD784ED48B9440540B?diaryId=9555)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Santo\_Rugger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e95f7d/32.png) [@Santo\_Rugger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Santo_Rugger)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2008, 3:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423/14 "2008-10-31T15:50:02Z")

</div>

The numbers aren’t really changing past the MOE, and if you look all the way back to when Obama won the nomination, you’ll see that the graphs are pretty noisy. Obama’s had a big climb lately, it’s only natural that it’s going to settle back into equilibrium.

While we’re in GQ, can somebody please tell me the difference between the projection and the trend lines on 538? I’m not sure I understand the distinction.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ultrafilter](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/3d9bf3/32.png) [@ultrafilter](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ultrafilter)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2008, 4:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423/15 "2008-10-31T16:00:21Z")

</div>

> [@Santo\_Rugger](#):
>
> While we’re in GQ, can somebody please tell me the difference between the projection and the trend lines on 538? I’m not sure I understand the distinction.

Roughly speaking, the trend is the way the polls have been moving, and the forecast is the way they expected the polls to move.

> [@Morgenstern](#):
>
> Intrade still claims Obama has 364 EV to McCain’s 174.

Intrade is not a reliable source. See [this recent thread](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=485854) for discussion.

> [@RealityChuck](#):
>
> I’ve been watching three: [www.fivethirtyeight.com](http://www.fivethirtyeight.com), [www.electoral-vote.com](http://www.electoral-vote.com) (both liberal leaning) and [rove.com](http://rove.com) (quite the opposite). None have shown any changes in the electoral votes in the past week.

The commentary at FiveThirtyEight may be pro-left, but I’ve never seen any reason to think their model is biased. Have you?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![An\_Arky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/87869e/32.png) [@An\_Arky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/An_Arky)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2008, 4:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423/16 "2008-10-31T16:27:06Z")

</div>

> [@Morgenstern](#):
>
> If you’re still nervous, you might want to knock on wood and read the following article from [openleft.com](http://openleft.com)
> 
> [http://openleft.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=A784DE4A1330AEAD784ED48B9440540B?diaryId=9555](http://openleft.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=A784DE4A1330AEAD784ED48B9440540B?diaryId=9555)

I find it odd that guy focuses exclusively on Iowa, New Mexico and Colorado. It may or may not be the safest guess according to the polls; I’ve seen similar point spreads in Ohio and Virginia, and I think both of those states’ polls close before any of the others. However, hesitance to rely on Ohio is certainly understandable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Declan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ecae2f/32.png) [@Declan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Declan)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2008, 6:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423/17 "2008-10-31T18:36:15Z")

</div>

> [@Enola\_Gay](#):
>
> I got a little nervous just now when I checked the [latest poll numbers](http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls/). Obama had an almost 8 point lead about a week ago and now the spread is down to 5.9. Why is he slipping? I heard on the news that they expected the race to tighten nearer to the election, but why would that be?

All guys want to get laid, so they were hanging out with the cool chicks and promising to vote obama in hopes of getting some.

Now its come down to the wire and the phrase cold day in hell has probably been uttered by the obamettes and the guys are thinkin, screw this , I’m voting McCain.

declan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gurujulp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/ba9def/32.png) [@gurujulp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gurujulp)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2008, 6:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423/18 "2008-10-31T18:38:36Z")

</div>

> [@Enola\_Gay](#):
>
> Didn’t know that. I thought they just took everyone’s polls and averaged them. Who do you think they are biased?

I am not too concerned- I haven’t been polled by anyone, and I am registered independant- but I am hella for obama. I also know several others in the same situation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jas09](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/d07c76/32.png) [@Jas09](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jas09)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2008, 6:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423/19 "2008-10-31T18:56:29Z")

</div>

> [@ultrafilter](#):
>
> Roughly speaking, the trend is the way the polls have been moving, and the forecast is the way they expected the polls to move.

To be a bit more precise, the trend line is the expected result if the election were held today (roughly the same as the RCP average). The projection line is what _will_ happen on Nov 4. There is a projected tightening as the race gets closer based on historical trends. This is why the projection line typically shows a lower margin of victory than the trend line (5.5% vs. 6.5% as of today).

There is some debate as to whether it even makes sense to have a projection line. The only thing you can really model with polling is what would happen if they election were held today (in fact that is typically how the questions are worded in the polls). Just because on historical average there is tightening doesn’t mean it makes sense to incorporate it into the model, IMO.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2008, 6:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423/20 "2008-10-31T18:59:56Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> The commentary at FiveThirtyEight may be pro-left, but I’ve never seen any reason to think their model is biased. Have you?

I haven’t, but the fact that the model was constructed by a left-leaning human, and that humans are fallible, means that one should at least consider the possibility that the model is biased. It’s probably safe to assume that the truth lies somewhere in between the results shown by 538 and [Rove.com](http://Rove.com) (though I would suspect closer to the 538 end).

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-obama-slipping-in-the-polls/470423.md?page=2)
