Why is socially provided universal healthcare 'better'?

No man is an island.

Why should a wall street banker earning millions get better health care than the maid who cleans his house?

I’d look at Kenneth Arrows work on economic dynamics in a health care market for a starting point. “Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care” specifically. It is considered some of the founding work in the discipline of Health Care Economics. If you actually need a reasoning for why healthier individuals are better for a society you’ll probably need to go into sociology though.

Or see Margaret Thatcher. “There’s no such thing as society” A society is the sum total of the individuals composing it, and it should be intuitivly obvious that spending more resources than neccessary for poorer health results for the components is bad for productivity.

Or for a practical example, Inc.coms article on startups in Norway looks at how the countries with the greatest number of business startups per person are the countries with the strongest welfare net. The cost of failiure being reduced below catastrophic frees up a lot of innovation.

That is an interesting theory, but when we look at reality, the opposite seems to happen. Socialized health care leads to lower prices across the board. Exactly why this is may be subject to debate, but it seems that the incentives of scale dominates.

Reported