# Why is the term person of interest used instead of suspect?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [November 29, 2017, 3:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061 "2017-11-29T15:42:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FlikTheBlue](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fliktheblue/32/10972_2.png) [@FlikTheBlue](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FlikTheBlue)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2017, 3:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061/1 "2017-11-29T15:42:19Z")

</div>

I often see law enforcement agencies refer to someone that most people would think of as a suspect as a person of interest instead. Why did this term come about? I would think a person of interest is someone like the nosy neighbor who happened to be looking out her window when the person across the street was murdered, or maybe a waiter who was serving a bunch of mafiosos who overheard something while they were dining. Why use the term for someone like the spouse of a person who looks like they got killed in a situation of domestic abuse and is now missing?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PatrickLondon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/patricklondon/32/4422_2.png) [@PatrickLondon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PatrickLondon)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2017, 4:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061/2 "2017-11-29T16:01:38Z")

</div>

It probably depends on the jurisdiction, but over here calling someone a “suspect” might be held to be prejudicing a future trial, and/or harmful to the interests of someone later clearly exonerated. We’ve had one or two horrendous “trial by media” cases, even without the use of the word “suspect”. The usual phrases here - so usual that people probably still interpret them prejudicially anyway - are “the police are anxious to interview…” (when someone’s gone on the run) and “helping police with their enquiries” (when they’ve got someone in the police station).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Clothahump](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/51bf81/32.png) [@Clothahump](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Clothahump)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2017, 4:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061/3 "2017-11-29T16:16:54Z")

</div>

Political correctness.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Doug\_K](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b5ac83/32.png) [@Doug\_K](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Doug_K)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2017, 4:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061/4 "2017-11-29T16:20:49Z")

</div>

A person of interest could be a suspect, but it could also be a potential witness. In some cases the police may not want the suspect to know he’s a suspect, or even that they have one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![doreen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/858c86/32.png) [@doreen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/doreen)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2017, 4:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061/5 "2017-11-29T16:23:22Z")

</div>

In my experience ( and I often have reason to talk to police officers about this very issue) , it refers to someone the police are interested in talking to for whatever reason. Maybe they’re a suspect, maybe the police believe the person is a witness, or maybe the police believe the person has information that they want. Could be any of them , it’s meant to be non-specific. The problem is that since it may mean “suspect”, people tend to assume it \*always \*means suspect.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2017, 4:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061/6 "2017-11-29T16:26:26Z")

</div>

In certain crimes, being called a “suspect” could completely ruin a persons life- they could lose their job, their wife, their freinds, and get beat up just becuase. Altho even the “person of interest” label can be bad.

> **[Richard Jewell](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Jewell)**
>
> Richard Allensworth Jewell (born Richard White; December 17, 1962 – August 29, 2007) was an American security guard and law enforcement officer who alerted police during the Centennial Olympic Park bombing at the 1996 Summer Olympics in Atlanta, Georgia. He discovered a backpack containing three pipe bombs on the park grounds and helped evacuate the area before the bomb exploded, saving many people from injury or death. For months afterward he was suspected of planting the bomb, leading Initia...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2017, 4:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061/7 "2017-11-29T16:38:49Z")

</div>

> [@Doug\_K](#):
>
> A person of interest could be a suspect, but it could also be a potential witness.

That’s my understanding. A suspect is always a person of interest, but a person of interest isn’t always a suspect.

Or, it could be degrees. “We think this person (of interest) might be somehow connected to the case, but we’re not sure in what way.”. It could just be someone who knows the actual suspect, but who isn’t a suspect themselves.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2017, 4:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061/8 "2017-11-29T16:44:21Z")

</div>

> [@Clothahump](#):
>
> Political correctness.

Exactly the opposite. The reverse to the pejorative way some people use political correctness as a slur for ideological reasons, “Person of interest” is a technical term of art that covers the situation without connotations. The equivalent would be, say, “force” in physics, which is a technical term having a specific and limited use, totally unlike the way force is used in society.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pulykamell](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pulykamell/32/3166_2.png) [@pulykamell](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pulykamell)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2017, 4:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061/9 "2017-11-29T16:52:28Z")

</div>

> [@Clothahump](#):
>
> Political correctness.

In what possible way? There is nothing “politically incorrect” about referring to or calling someone a suspect in a crime.

At any rate, “person of interest” casts a wider net and has a broader meaning than “suspect.” It can be someone who may have some knowledge of the crime. Like during the Las Vegas shooting, I remember the shooter’s wife being “a person of interest” as the news reports started coming out (so much so that some people thought she actually _was_ the main suspect. This is why we use phrases like “person of interest.”)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shmendrik](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ee7513/32.png) [@Shmendrik](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shmendrik)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2017, 4:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061/10 "2017-11-29T16:56:02Z")

</div>

edited

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/loach/32/350_2.png) [@Loach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Loach)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2017, 5:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061/11 "2017-11-29T17:32:51Z")

</div>

> [@Clothahump](#):
>
> Political correctness.

No.

> [@Doug\_K](#):
>
> A person of interest could be a suspect, but it could also be a potential witness. In some cases the police may not want the suspect to know he’s a suspect, or even that they have one.

Yes. Sometimes you don’t want them to know they are a suspect. Other times they have no idea what their involvement might be. For instance the girlfriend of the Las Vegas shooter was a person of interest. They did not know what her involvement was if any. So far it appears she had no involvement.

> **[Las Vegas shooting updates: Deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history](https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-las-vegas-shooting-live-updates-carnage-concert-leaves-50-dead-100-injured-20171002-htmlstory.html#girlfriend-of-las-vegas-gunman-a-person-of-interest-in-mass-shooting-has-landed-in-los-angeles)**
>
> ResourcesVictims Oct. 5, 2017, 9:45 a.m.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Yllaria](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/yllaria/32/3452_2.png) [@Yllaria](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Yllaria)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2017, 6:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061/12 "2017-11-29T18:53:16Z")

</div>

> [@Clothahump](#):
>
> Political correctness.

Just to add, the phrase pre-dates the term political correctness. I always saw it as a CYA term designed by lawyers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RealityChuck](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/realitychuck/32/195_2.png) [@RealityChuck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RealityChuck)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2017, 6:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061/13 "2017-11-29T18:54:59Z")

</div>

> [@pulykamell](#):
>
> In what possible way? There is nothing “politically incorrect” about referring to or calling someone a suspect in a crime.

If you just wanted to question a witness, calling him a suspect is a libel suit waiting to happen.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2017, 7:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061/14 "2017-11-29T19:03:29Z")

</div>

The line between provider of useful info, witness, co-conspirator, and suspect can be pretty fuzzy even after the case is fully prepped for trial. When the police are first getting their arms around what the heck happened with who, it’s nice to have a generic term for all the above.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2017, 7:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061/15 "2017-11-29T19:17:04Z")

</div>

But even without her having any actual involvement, she could tell police like when she last saw him and where, and maybe recall past conversations where he was grumbling about those damn country music fans, or maybe say that he ran up a large charge on her last credit card statement and didn’t tell her what it was for, or whatever. And all of those pieces of information would be very valuable to the police. Hence, she’s a “person of interest”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pulykamell](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pulykamell/32/3166_2.png) [@pulykamell](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pulykamell)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2017, 8:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061/16 "2017-11-29T20:15:32Z")

</div>

> [@RealityChuck](#):
>
> If you just wanted to question a witness, calling him a suspect is a libel suit waiting to happen.

Nothing to do with so-called “political correctness,” though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2017, 9:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061/17 "2017-11-29T21:16:58Z")

</div>

> [@Clothahump](#):
>
> Political correctness.

**Moderator Note**

**Clothahump** , keep the political potshots out of General Questions. No warning issued.

If you disagree with this note, open a new thread in ATMB. Do not dispute moderation here.

Colibri  
General Questions Moderator

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Enola\_Gay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/3ab097/32.png) [@Enola\_Gay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Enola_Gay)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2017, 1:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061/18 "2017-11-30T01:51:39Z")

</div>

I think it’s more of a “potential suspect”. They haven’t risen to the level of suspect yet, but police want to talk to them to see if they should escalate them to suspect status. I haven’t seen that term used to refer to witnesses.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lemur866](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lemur866/32/434_2.png) [@Lemur866](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lemur866)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2017, 2:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061/19 "2017-11-30T02:42:21Z")

</div>

I have. Lots of times the cops interview the person of interest, and send them on their way. Sometimes the cops themselves haven’t decided if the person was a witness, an accessory, or a co-conspirator until after they hear the person’s story and decide if it makes sense.

And of course, interviewing someone as a witness and telling them they are free to go doesn’t preclude charging them with a crime later. That was Lieutenant Columbo’s favorite tactic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Melbourne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b5e925/32.png) [@Melbourne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Melbourne)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2017, 3:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061/20 "2017-11-30T03:35:29Z")

</div>

The police have a jargon, just as other linquistic communitees do. And the words are selected and used slightly differently than other people would do: that’s jargon.

But of course Political Correctness is one part of the development of the jargon: the police are public servents, answerable to a bureaucracy, which is answerable to ellected officials. They get into trouble if their bosses are embarrassed by the media, just like they get into trouble if their bosses are embarrassed by criticism from the courts

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-the-term-person-of-interest-used-instead-of-suspect/803061.md?page=2)
