Why is the U.S. Army changing the basic color of everyday service uniforms AGAIN?

Well yeah, but you have to admit a lot of that stuff is because some butterbar just had the best idea EVAR!

They should just switch to halberds, red frock-coats and white stocking.

I was in the Army when they switched to berets and thought they were absurdly pointless. It looks like they’re getting rid of them for the switch to the new uniforms? If so, I wholeheartedly support the change (Of course Rangers and Delta Force can keep theirs).

Now let’s keep uniforms the same for more than a decade or two, okay? I agree with the others in this thread who say the whole point of the uniform is that it should look the same from generation to generation so everyone knows who’s a soldier at a glance.

I’ve posted before about how the Army has ruined the beret. – Why has the U.S. Army ruined the beret?

My point exactly.

Sign me up! The Greek, Indian and Pakistani militaries have something to teach us, too:


[off topic]

I’ve never heard the word “janky.” AF slang? Regional?

[/off topic]

I disagree. It’s like comparing a sloppy, ill fitting shirt to one that is fitted and tailored. The US Army’s current method of wear looks much sharper.

Certainly better than the idea that was being floated when I first on active. Each branch would have its own colored beret. Baby blue for infantry, yellow/armor, red/engineers etc. That sounds like a nightmare.

Doesn’t the Air Force do something like that?

I reject the idea that a proper beret is comparable to an ill-fitting and “sloppy” shirt. It kind of makes me angry to see that comparison.

The Army beret as currently worn just looks stupid.

That’s the beauty of opinions. I reject your idea as well. Though, I’m not sure why it makes you angry. Of the two of us, I’m the one who wears a beret every day and you’re the one saying the way I wear it looks stupid. It doesn’t make me angry, though. You’re entitled to your opinion. I just think a floppy, pancake chef beret looks terrible–both from a fashion standpoint and a military one.

I don’t wear a beret every day but I wear one quite often. With a fitted business suit and tailored shirt. It’s not like I’m expressing a completely idle opinion.

The Israeli military does exactly that (albeit with a different color scheme). It works just fine.

It wouldn’t work in the US Army simply because we use berets to distinguish certain types of units. Regardless of branch or specific job, all personnel in those units wear the distinctive color. So, having each branch wear a different color would interfere with that system.

Ah, I see. We don’t have permanently mixed units under the division level.

Dunno how regional, but it was popularized in the 90s.

IANA soldier, but I liked the dress blues. They look sharp, and professional, and, at least to me, iconographically distinct from Navy dress blues.

I was however very confused several years ago to walk into an Annie Leibowitz exhibition to see a large photograph of Gen. Norman Schwartzkopf in a [white](IANA soldier, but I liked the dress blues. They look sharp, and professional, and, at least to me, iconographically distinct from Navy dress blues. I was however very confused several years ago to walk into an Annie Leibowitz exhibition to see a large photograph of Gen. Norman Schwartzkopf in a [URL="https://www.pinterest.com/pin/858006166480043952/) dress uniform…

Never seen that one before! Wikipedia:

Air Force berets:
Black - Tactical Air Control Party (TACP), Air Liaison Officers (ALO), and Air Mobility Liaison Officers (AMLO)
Maroon - Combat Rescue Officers and Pararescuemen (PJs)
Red (scarlet) - Combat Controllers & Special Tactics Officers
Royal Blue - Security Forces and United States Air Force Academy First-Class Cadets & Basic Cadet Training cadre
Grey - Special Operations Weather Technician
Green - Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape (SERE) Specialists