Imho, it’s because that the US is just about the only country in the world where individual effort is rewarded, in the absence of social, political, religious or parental control.
I’m not sure I understand your main point. Canada and Australia were also thousands of miles away from Britain, but they seem to have more in common with western Europe than the US does.
I think our history of racial tension plays a role in why our society is different. Racially homogenous areas of the US like New England or the northern midwest (Minnesota, Wisconsin, etc) tend to be more liberal, whereas the racially mixed areas like the south tend to be more authoritarian. At least generally. Racially homogenous areas like the northwest (Idaho, Montana, Wyoming) are extremely conservative while somewhat racially diverse areas like IL and NY are more liberal. But I do wonder what our history of racial tension does to our society and plays in how our society has run its course. Racial tension seems like a strong motivator to avoid both social welfare and libertarianism. Fear of an uprising by the minorities and fear of breakdown of the social order (which is based on submission and segregation) leads to authoritarianism and fear that ‘our’ money will be taxed and given to ‘them’ is used to stop social programs whether they be universal health care, universal education, welfare, unemployment insurance, etc.
I really don’t know where our arrogance comes from. Did we have the “USA #1” attitude before WW2?
I also don’t know why/if the US values material goods over leisure or a work/life balance than most other wealthy countries. I get the impression we do, we care more about wealth than vacation days. Not sure where that came from.
I think you’re right. Distance from enemy arnaments is convenient. (So convenient that America’s military “Central Command” refers to the center of Eurasia, not Center of America.) Vast virgin (once natives are disposed of) wilderness was also valuable.
But don’t forget the famous American genes for genius!
Charlie Chaplin was one of Hollywood’s most creative filmmakers;
Wernher von Braun developed the world’s best rockets for us;
Sergey Brin developed outstanding search software;
and the list goes on…
Do most European countries restrict emigration? Wouldn’t that be a violation of the social contract? You have to be able to leave, or your government is actually authoritarian, not liberal as has been argued here.
Imagine a church that wouldn’t let you leave: wouldn’t you call that a cult?
Thanks for showing up. I guess I’m not on your ignore list.
Simply put, Canada and Australia depended heavily on British imports. We, OTOH, were plopped down in a great location with a powerful beachhead and allied profiteers in Parliament.
Who could argue? Yet racial tension has been the human lot since time began and it does not differ here today. So, what’s the difference?
I invite you and other interested parties to pick up our conversation about why the USA is exceptional there. IMHO, it is the conflating of ‘free marketer’ and Capitalist. A free marketer will shake your hand and leave you with it.