Why is there no bodhran in bluegrass?

I don’t know about the pennywhistles but the uilliean pipes are quite difficult to learn and a nightmare to take care of what with all the moving parts and multiple reeds. You don’t see too many reed instruments in bluegrass, either.

At most of the contra dances I’ve been to, the band described themselves as “bluegrass”. Maybe they’re not what a purist would call bluegrass, but it’s certainly close. And contra-dance bands don’t have bodhrans, either.

He’s not suggesting that. He’s only comparing them to fiddles to make clear that the reason for their lack is not difficulty in making them. If the settlers from the Old Country retained the craftsmanship, skills, and tools to make something as fiddly (heh) as a violin, then surely they also retained the ability to make bodhrans.

In The Bodhrán: The Black Sheep in the Family of Traditional Irish Musical Instruments
David G. Such, published in The Galpin Society Journal, Vol. 38 (Apr., 1985) the author suggests that dedicated bodhrán production only began in the 1930s, that hitherto a skin tray called a wight which served multiple purposes in rural households, had doubled as the drum. The author says there may well be more ancient origins but scant documentary evidence exists for the instrument prior to the 1950s. I see from the Wiki entry that visual documentary evidence from the 1830s does exist though it seems that whenever the instrument was devised, it only became a common, recognisable instrument in Irish music mid-20th century.

Mouth harp as a percussion instrument? I’m doubtful of that. You forgot to mention washboard, though.

The washboard is not much used in bluegrass, it is more of a zydeco or cajun style instrument.

This is more than somewhat off-topic, but having just come from a contra dance weekend, I have to throw in that is a wild oversimplification of contra music, as well as an increasingly outdated stereotype. Drum-based (so many types of drums) percussion is alive and well in modern contra music.

I will grant you that bands that bill themselves as “bluegrass” first and “contra dance bands” second are much more likely to fit into the traditional mountain trio/quartet of fiddle, banjo, mandolin, and “everything else.”

As to the original question, it may also have to do with solo ability. A solo fiddle can carry a tune perfectly well, as can any other string. If you’ve only got the finances or the room for one “real” instrument, better to make it one that can do the most by itself.

From another angle, why bother having an official instrument to percuss, when items around the house and yard can be gathered and coopted to handle that task perfectly well? Jugs, homemade tambours, and even body parts get used regularly for percussion, and work perfectly fine. On the other hand, I’ve never once met someone who could jury-rig a fiddle from their kitchen supplies.

Would you prefer if I said that most contra bands lack bodhran? I probably haven’t been to as many dances as you, but I’ve never seen one.

Here’s one source that traces the Hawaiian steel guitar’s influence on country & blues.

I suspect that, as it#s cheap to make, a drum of any kind would not be a priority over a more valuable instrument such as a violin or accordian for transporting from the British Isles to North America. The bagpipes may also have been dumped due to their tendency to go out of tune in the ‘wrong’ climate (too hot, too dry, too damp, etc.).

Yeah, that’s my understanding. Also, in the first post, it asserted that Hawaii got guitars from Mexico. That’s incorrect - it was from Portugal. My mom has some very early Portuguese built-in-Hawaii ukuleles.