# Why is this: Differences in soap opera set lighting

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-this-differences-in-soap-opera-set-lighting/349707>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [March 24, 2006, 11:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-this-differences-in-soap-opera-set-lighting/349707 "2006-03-24T11:41:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 12\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HMS\_Irruncible](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hms_irruncible/32/7394_2.png) [@HMS\_Irruncible](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HMS_Irruncible)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2006, 11:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-this-differences-in-soap-opera-set-lighting/349707/1 "2006-03-24T11:41:35Z")

</div>

Whenever I’m watching TV, I see an instant and obvious visual difference between soap operas/sitcoms and movies/dramas. The movies/dramas look realistic and the soap operas/sitcoms don’t. The difference is always obvious and immediate to me, and it’s not the live studio audience noises either).

Not being a student of filmography nor a very visual person, I can’t ferret out the reasons for this on my own. The only thing I can guess is it’s something to do with lighting… the soaps/sitcoms seem to have more overhead or artificial lighting. Can anybody help? This has been bugging me forever.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MsMitey](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f19dbf/32.png) [@MsMitey](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MsMitey)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2006, 12:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-this-differences-in-soap-opera-set-lighting/349707/2 "2006-03-24T12:20:54Z")

</div>

I think it’s mostly to do with film vs. videotape. Film is expensive, and soaps would need to shoot a lot of it, so they use video instead. The quality of tape is lousy, and that’s why soaps look the way they do.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mks57](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b9bd4f/32.png) [@mks57](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mks57)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2006, 12:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-this-differences-in-soap-opera-set-lighting/349707/3 "2006-03-24T12:45:25Z")

</div>

> [@MsMitey](#):
>
> The quality of tape is lousy, and that’s why soaps look the way they do.

It certainly looks different than film, but I wouldn’t call it lousy. I’ve heard cinematographers call 24 frames per second a feature, not a defect, as it is part of what is widely considered the “film look”, along with visible grain and other artifacts.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shagnasty](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9dc877/32.png) [@Shagnasty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shagnasty)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2006, 12:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-this-differences-in-soap-opera-set-lighting/349707/4 "2006-03-24T12:57:34Z")

</div>

When I was little, I asked my mother why people in soap operas never turned their indoor lights on. She told me its was because they were crappy shows and couldn’t afford a bigger electric bill.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Richard\_Pearse](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/richard_pearse/32/13144_2.png) [@Richard\_Pearse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Richard_Pearse)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2006, 1:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-this-differences-in-soap-opera-set-lighting/349707/5 "2006-03-24T13:29:12Z")

</div>

Soaps also seem to use very soft lighting, but I don’t think that’s what you’re seeing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MizGrand](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/cdc98d/32.png) [@MizGrand](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MizGrand)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2006, 1:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-this-differences-in-soap-opera-set-lighting/349707/6 "2006-03-24T13:55:55Z")

</div>

Huge AMC fan here – 25 years in.

I’ve heard that they smear petroleum jelly on the lens when filming “older” actor’s scenes. Softens wrinkles, I’ve read somewhere. Is that true? La Lucci doesn’t really look smeared or softened and her waddle is now becoming quite, um, icky. But nonetheless I love the woman and she’s a part of my hypothetical family.

Susan is truly the Queen, bow and scrape to the Queen and ye shall be rewarded with perhaps another 30 years of Erica Kane!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zsofia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/7bcc69/32.png) [@Zsofia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zsofia)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2006, 2:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-this-differences-in-soap-opera-set-lighting/349707/7 "2006-03-24T14:31:02Z")

</div>

I’ve been told, also, that one of the reasons for the “soap opera look” is that they light “generally”, so that any camera can take a shot without changing any of the lighting. Is that true?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CookingWithGas](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cookingwithgas/32/485_2.png) [@CookingWithGas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CookingWithGas)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2006, 2:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-this-differences-in-soap-opera-set-lighting/349707/8 "2006-03-24T14:36:44Z")

</div>

Here’s an [older thread](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=254466) about the same topic, with some pretty good info.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MizGrand](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/cdc98d/32.png) [@MizGrand](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MizGrand)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2006, 3:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-this-differences-in-soap-opera-set-lighting/349707/9 "2006-03-24T15:46:40Z")

</div>

Good link, but, but, no answers about the Vaseline!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MsMitey](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f19dbf/32.png) [@MsMitey](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MsMitey)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2006, 4:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-this-differences-in-soap-opera-set-lighting/349707/10 "2006-03-24T16:42:05Z")

</div>

I’ve heard of both vaseline and a “cheesecloth filter,” which IIRC was just a piece of cheesecloth in front of the lens for the same effect. No cites, sorry.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lissa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/85f322/32.png) [@Lissa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lissa)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2006, 5:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-this-differences-in-soap-opera-set-lighting/349707/11 "2006-03-24T17:04:21Z")

</div>

> [@RSSchen](#):
>
> Huge AMC fan here – 25 years in.
> 
> I’ve heard that they smear petroleum jelly on the lens when filming “older” actor’s scenes.

I would imagine that they have special lens filters these days, so actually putting Vaseline on the lens wouldn’t be necessary. (Think of the PITA it would be to try to get the gunk off the lens.) I’ve also heard that they sometimes change the lighting for older actresses, using a pinker light than usual, to give them a youthful look.

As for whether they still do this, I’d say watch scenes with older actresses. How distinct are the strands of their hair in comparison with other actresses? Look at other objects around them in the scene-- do they seem less distinct than in other scenes? Is the lighting a bit pinker?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![garygnu](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/garygnu/32/2924_2.png) [@garygnu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/garygnu)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2006, 5:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-this-differences-in-soap-opera-set-lighting/349707/12 "2006-03-24T17:21:37Z")

</div>

To see how vaseline on the lens looks, look at any old movie with a starlet in it. Look for the shots with nothing but the girl, that’s the one with vaseline. Usually a reaction shot with her looking up. There’s a few in Casablanca. BTW, you’d put it on a filter, not the actual lens.  
As for soap operas, they can’t afford delays like a boom mic shadow in the shot, so the trade-off for daily shooting turn-around is bland lighting.
