# Why isn't a vaporizer affecting the humidity in my room

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-isnt-a-vaporizer-affecting-the-humidity-in-my-room/649245>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [February 3, 2013, 7:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-isnt-a-vaporizer-affecting-the-humidity-in-my-room/649245 "2013-02-03T19:07:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![moriah](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b2d939/32.png) [@moriah](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/moriah)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 4:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-isnt-a-vaporizer-affecting-the-humidity-in-my-room/649245/61 "2013-02-07T16:50:24Z")

</div>

> [@snailboy](#):
>
> I’m well aware of what dynamic equilibrium is having taken chemistry in college. The system is not going to reach dynamic equilibrium while the humidity is above saturation.

What do you mean by ‘saturation’?

Air is saturated with water vapor when the Relative Humidity is at 100%. Temperature and pressure affect how much water vapor can be in the air for it to reach saturation/100%RH.

If you mean “water vapor is removed faster or as fast as the rate at which it is being put into the system”, then that is not ‘saturation’, or at least, not the correct word. It would be like saying the sink is ‘saturated’ with water because as much is running down the drain as coming in from the tap.

The room’s Relative Humidity is 20%. That is no where near saturation. However, given the draftiness of many households, a small portable humidifier probably can’t keep up with the air replacement to budge the RH of the room. The room isn’t saturated… it’s leaky.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![johnpost](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/f17d59/32.png) [@johnpost](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/johnpost)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 5:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-isnt-a-vaporizer-affecting-the-humidity-in-my-room/649245/62 "2013-02-07T17:29:25Z")

</div>

while the situation is dynamic i doubt it will ever be at an equilibrium (that’s just scientific speak, i would bet my left nut that it never will be if the room is being used in a household as a bedroom). the OP did not mention time duration or other factors like type of heat/ventilation, room air exchange, amount and type of material in the room.

there is likely air leakage in and out of the room. the window is cooling air and causing circulation, the vaporizer is pushing air. if the heating is air flow then there are air changes. there may be much moisture still being absorbed by clothes, bedding, carpet and so on.

too much is unknown.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snailboy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/97f17d/32.png) [@snailboy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/snailboy)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 5:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-isnt-a-vaporizer-affecting-the-humidity-in-my-room/649245/63 "2013-02-07T17:50:18Z")

</div>

> [@DSeid](#):
>
> I think that you are assuming that the only alternative to “blocking the air” must be complete air mixing at all times and a capacity for the window to condense any theoretically large amount of humidity at any rate. In reality you have only a fairly small portion of the air in the room coming into contact with the pane even over the whole night, let alone at one time, while in the meanwhile more moisture is being put in elsewhere.

I am assuming that the vapor diffuses pretty quickly throughout the room and mixes pretty evenly, in no more than a few minutes. Is this not the case? Does it take hours for the vapor to get from the humidifier to the window?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 7:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-isnt-a-vaporizer-affecting-the-humidity-in-my-room/649245/64 "2013-02-07T19:13:13Z")

</div>

> [@snailboy](#):
>
> I am assuming that the vapor diffuses pretty quickly throughout the room and mixes pretty evenly, in no more than a few minutes. Is this not the case? Does it take hours for the vapor to get from the humidifier to the window?

The volume of air needs to move across the window surface for it to dehumidify it. Most rooms do not have circulation such that that occurs. Even with air leakage and drafts air will tend to have layers and a volume of air will stay relatively stuck near the surfaces. Maybe **Chronos** or someone else with a greater physics knowledge can explain it clearer but it is more like fluid dynamics than diffusion at work.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![johnpost](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/f17d59/32.png) [@johnpost](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/johnpost)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 7:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-isnt-a-vaporizer-affecting-the-humidity-in-my-room/649245/65 "2013-02-07T19:14:51Z")

</div>

there will be circulation past the window due to convective airflow.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 8:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-isnt-a-vaporizer-affecting-the-humidity-in-my-room/649245/66 "2013-02-07T20:57:29Z")

</div>

Yes. But not enough to cause complete mixing of air throughout the room. Possibly not even significant mixing of the air. There is at least no reason to assume it would be.

Fluid dynamics of air flow is above my pay grade but just looking at the visualizations in [this article](http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132304001714) illustrates how mixing is often extremely incomplete and how various boundry conditions occur.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![johnpost](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/f17d59/32.png) [@johnpost](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/johnpost)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 9:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-isnt-a-vaporizer-affecting-the-humidity-in-my-room/649245/67 "2013-02-07T21:28:20Z")

</div>

there is likely air circulations and gradients of temperature and humidity all over the room.

the window much colder than the bulk of the room. the exterior wall likely colder than the bulk of the room. the door to a hallway may be warmer than an exterior room. the heating system will create a convective flow. the vaporizer will create a flow.

there may be steep gradients near the window and near the vaporizer.

there could be eddys and unmixed areas throughout the room.

the dynamics of this situation is hard to predict; it will depend on indoor and outdoor temperatures, amount of insulation, air leakage, materials in the room, did the person go out to take a drink during the night because of the dry air (did they leave the door open?), did they later pee at night because they drank too much water (did they leave the door open?).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2013, 2:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-isnt-a-vaporizer-affecting-the-humidity-in-my-room/649245/68 "2013-02-08T14:36:52Z")

</div>

> [@johnpost](#):
>
> … there could be eddys and unmixed areas throughout the room.
> 
> the dynamics of this situation is hard to predict …

This sounds reasonable. Expecting mixing “pretty evenly, in no more than a few minutes” however does not. And assuming that (if the air _was_ constantly completely mixed) the window surface has the dehumidification capacity to take out humidity at the same rate that a vaporizer also does not seem reasonable.

Meanwhile [here](http://www.bae.uky.edu/energy/residential/guide/guidehtml/guidep20.htm) is a source that tells us the real answer. A typical existing home completely changes its air volume from 0.5 to 1.25 times each hour. An older leaky home (which this one sounds like), from 1.0 to 2.5 times an hour.

Condensation will occur so long as the humidity is above dew point at the window surface. Single pane, no storm, 30% indoor relative humidity will do that at any outside temperature much below 34F. It is not a significant issue for where the water is going.

The fact that all the air in the house, the complete house, is being exchanged at least every hour, OTOH, is.

In case you doubt that one site’s claim, and I wouldn’t blame you, it is to me a surprisingly large number, the same figures are repeated bu a variety of sources. [Here’s another](http://epb.apogee.net/res/reevair.asp):

> [@](#):
>
> The air-tightness of a home is often indicated by air-change rate; the number of times the home’s air changes over with outside air. For example, if the amount of air that enters and exits in one hour equals the total volume of the heated part of the house, the house is said to undergo one air change per hour. …
> 
> … The national average of air change rates, for existing homes, is between one and two per hour … A somewhat loose older home with no storm windows and caulk missing in spots has an air change rate of about 2. A fairly loose, drafty house with no caulk or weatherstripping and entrances used might have an air change rate as high as 4, and a very drafty, dilapidated house might have an air change rate of as high as 8.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-isnt-a-vaporizer-affecting-the-humidity-in-my-room/649245.md?page=3)
