# Why only some face-obscuring on Cops?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-only-some-face-obscuring-on-cops/295529>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [March 21, 2005, 7:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-only-some-face-obscuring-on-cops/295529 "2005-03-21T07:46:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![duffer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/duffer/32/1026_2.png) [@duffer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/duffer)\
**Post date:** [March 21, 2005, 7:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-only-some-face-obscuring-on-cops/295529/1 "2005-03-21T07:46:02Z")

</div>

I watch _Cops_ pretty much every day. I’ve seen every episode at least once. Most of the time, the suspect is shown in his full glory, but every now and then, the face is obscured so as to thwart recognition.

I used to just assume that if the person was convicted of anything stemming from that arrest, the image was free to use.

But now I want to know for sure. Do those arrested on the show have to sign a waiver? Do they get any monetary gain if they’re innocent but allow their face to be used?

How does this all work?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![groman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/73ab20/32.png) [@groman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/groman)\
**Post date:** [March 21, 2005, 8:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-only-some-face-obscuring-on-cops/295529/2 "2005-03-21T08:39:37Z")

</div>

Just a WAG, but it’s probably just a waiver thing. Most people will sign a waiver, while some will not, and wind up blurred.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GuanoLad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guanolad/32/42_2.png) [@GuanoLad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GuanoLad)\
**Post date:** [March 21, 2005, 8:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-only-some-face-obscuring-on-cops/295529/3 "2005-03-21T08:40:26Z")

</div>

The ones obscured have not signed a waiver. Even if it is true that once they’re convicted they’re free to be broadcast, I imagine to cover all their bases they stick by contracts anyway.

Some who haven’t signed I have imagined are just hard to track down, rather than have refused, though I’m sure there are many refusals too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gotpasswords](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/c57346/32.png) [@gotpasswords](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gotpasswords)\
**Post date:** [March 21, 2005, 3:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-only-some-face-obscuring-on-cops/295529/4 "2005-03-21T15:58:17Z")

</div>

There’s also the “innocent until proven guilty” part - if their case hasn’t come to trial by the time the show is produced and released, they may not be able to show the person’s face or otherwise disclose their identity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ragiel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/6de8d8/32.png) [@Ragiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ragiel)\
**Post date:** [March 21, 2005, 4:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-only-some-face-obscuring-on-cops/295529/5 "2005-03-21T16:04:06Z")

</div>

> [@duffer](#):
>
> I watch _Cops_ pretty much every day. I’ve seen every episode at least once. Most of the time, the suspect is shown in his full glory, but every now and then, the face is obscured so as to thwart recognition.
> 
> I used to just assume that if the person was convicted of anything stemming from that arrest, the image was free to use.
> 
> But now I want to know for sure. Do those arrested on the show have to sign a waiver? Do they get any monetary gain if they’re innocent but allow their face to be used?
> 
> How does this all work?

I’m certain I remember one episode where a suspect’s dog sat on the couch with its face blurred.

I thought it was hilarious.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Walloon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/fbc32d/32.png) [@Walloon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Walloon)\
**Post date:** [March 21, 2005, 4:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-only-some-face-obscuring-on-cops/295529/6 "2005-03-21T16:12:53Z")

</div>

> [@gotpasswords](#):
>
> There’s also the “innocent until proven guilty” part - if their case hasn’t come to trial by the time the show is produced and released, they may not be able to show the person’s face or otherwise disclose their identity.

Not really. News programs are free to show an arrested person being led handcuffed into a police car, or at an arraignment hearing. You see it all the time.

The big difference is this: _Cops_ is not a news program. It is a reality-based _entertainment_ program. As an entertainment program, it must have the permission of all the people shown on screen (other than in crowds or passersby). Believe it or not, the producers of _Cops_ ask all involved for permission to use their images, in return for a standard performer’s fee. All of the non-blurred people you see on _Cops_ — police officers, perpetrators, victims, family members — have signed such an agreement (although in most jurisdictions the cops are not allowed to take the money).
