Very good summary, and I admit it hadn’t occurred to me that disenfranchisement as well as Bricker’s proposed restoration process are in no way proportional to the severity of the offense except perhaps in the arbitrary determination of a governor or other state official who can decide a particular crime is too heinous or infamous to risk the potential political fallout of restoration.
This is precisely what I was describing earlier. Are you trying to imply my opinion should be discarded because I am pro-felon or pro-felony? I am neither - I’m pro- every adult citizen gets a chance to exercise the franchise.