# Why should I care about gay marriage?

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766
**Category:** Great Debates
**Created:** [February 20, 2014, 2:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766 "2014-02-20T02:37:39Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 12

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Antinor01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ecae2f/32.png) [@Antinor01](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Antinor01)
#### Post date: [February 24, 2014, 11:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766/222 "2014-02-24T23:12:11Z")

</div>

> [@Melchior](#):
>
> I am not among them. Some people are more or less \*resigned \*to it because they have lost faith in the rationality of the judiciary and consider the fight not worth the effort.

Good enough for me. There’s plenty of things I don’t support, but am resigned to and don’t consider it worth the effort to fight.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Farin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/e79b87/32.png) [@Farin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Farin)
#### Post date: [February 24, 2014, 11:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766/223 "2014-02-24T23:13:49Z")

</div>

> [@Melchior](#):
>
> No, I had lots of conversations with almost all of them. I went to gay bars with them and they explained the dynamics.

With respect, that’s bullshit. Young homosexuals operate the same as young heterosexuals. A lot are quiet and meet and have a relationship that isn’t “in your face.” Then you have some that are unrepentant party animals and serial one night stand participants.

The correlation? The 60/70’s phrase of “Young, Dumb, and Full of Cum” is far more likely than “zomg homosexuality.”

I want to tell you about someone. You know those Hollywood stereotypes of the flaming queer guy? Lisp? Fashion conscious? Wine connoisseur? Utterly annoying? I know that man. He is straight as the day is long.

It seems people are variations and stereotyping isn’t useful to understanding a wide demographic.

> [@Antinor01](#):
>
> And naturally that ends the discussion right there! There are absolutely no gay men in long term relationships. I personally am in the 13th year of a casual one night stand with the same guy. Several other members here have been having a fling with the same guy for over 20 years. Clearly the experience of your friends is the only one that is possible.

Well, heck, that’s only 20 days on Venus. That’s not even monogamy, yet. 😃

> [@Miller](#):
>
> We \*have \*proven ourselves to be every bit as worthy. That’s why we’re demanding what we deserve: equal recognition.

No offense, Miller, but this is what I don’t like. People should not have to “prove” themselves to be human. Non heterosexuals aren’t any different than heterosexuals. I don’t see any reason to not accept them as members of society or to force them underground in some sort of society-level shaming.

I really wish that this tribalism in all things that’s been developing over the last 25+ years would just knock it the heck off. There is no them. There is only us.

> [@Steely\_Dan\_Fan](#):
>
> So…you’re fine with same-sex marriage now? Because that’s what’s going on: we, as a society, collectively, are changing marriage customs.
> 
> Legal and judicial rulings merely _reflect_ this change in sensibility; they are not determining it. How is this difficult for you to understand?

I think that over time we are changing sensibilities as a society, but I also recognize that roughly half the country disagrees with the other half. I still think that there will be ten plus more years of this struggle. ☹

> [@Melchoir](#):
>
> I am not among them. Some people are more or less resigned to it because they have lost faith in the rationality of the judiciary and consider the fight not worth the effort.

The judiciary is actually _using rationality_ to dismiss arguments that people should be treated differently based on _orientation._ It’s just as retarded as giving people second class status because they eat pork and not chicken.

Whatever the reason (to avoid the nature vs nurture debate) they don’t practice the same sexuality as you, why should that mean they get treated differently than you?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Melchior](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e5b9ba/32.png) [@Melchior](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Melchior)
#### Post date: [February 24, 2014, 11:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766/224 "2014-02-24T23:16:23Z")

</div>

> [@Farin](#):
>
> The judiciary is actually _using rationality_ to dismiss arguments that people should be treated differently based on _orientation._ It’s just as retarded as giving people second class status because they eat pork and not chicken.
> 
> Whatever the reason (to avoid the nature vs nurture debate) they don’t practice the same sexuality as you, why should that mean they get treated differently than you?

They are not ‘treated differently’! That’s a straw man argument!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)
#### Post date: [February 24, 2014, 11:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766/225 "2014-02-24T23:16:45Z")

</div>

> [@Melchior](#):
>
> Well, they owned slaves and women were not allowed to vote.

Yes. Thus, they would not be troubled by this aspect of the system they themselves created.

> [@](#):
>
> Anything else you care to bring up?

Well, I don’t know much about obscure same-sex practices in foreign cultures, so I’ll leave those digressions to you…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)
#### Post date: [February 24, 2014, 11:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766/226 "2014-02-24T23:17:48Z")

</div>

> [@Melchior](#):
>
> They are not ‘treated differently’!

I - and probably dozens of other people - already explained this to you.

> [@](#):
>
> That’s a straw man argument!

You don’t know what a strawman argument is. It’s too late to spare yourself from embarrassment, but you should still stop using the term.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Farin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/e79b87/32.png) [@Farin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Farin)
#### Post date: [February 24, 2014, 11:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766/227 "2014-02-24T23:18:26Z")

</div>

> [@Melchior](#):
>
> They are not ‘treated differently’! That’s a straw man argument!

Go marry your best male friend in Montana. You will be denied based on their constitutional amendment that says same sex partners cannot get married and cannot get benefits.

Now go marry your best female friend. It’ll take you 15 minutes. if there’s a line.  
Different treatment is not a strawman.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)
#### Post date: [February 24, 2014, 11:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766/228 "2014-02-24T23:19:07Z")

</div>

> [@Farin](#):
>
> No offense, Miller, but this is what I don’t like. People should not have to “prove” themselves to be human.

I didn’t say we _should_, I said we _did_. I’m not the one who put the barrier there, I’m just pointing out that we’ve long since cleared it.

Not sure wtf you’re talking about with the tribalism stuff.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)
#### Post date: [February 24, 2014, 11:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766/229 "2014-02-24T23:20:31Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> Not sure wtf you’re talking about with the tribalism stuff.

He’s saying people only started dividing themselves into little groups about 25 years ago. Before that, everybody agreed we were all one species and held hands while singing “Kumbaya.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Farin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/e79b87/32.png) [@Farin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Farin)
#### Post date: [February 24, 2014, 11:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766/230 "2014-02-24T23:22:51Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> I didn’t say we _should_, I said we _did_. I’m not the one who put the barrier there, I’m just pointing out that we’ve long since cleared it.
> 
> Not sure wtf you’re talking about with the tribalism stuff.

It’s the binary classification of “with us or against us” that we have fallen into. Politics was always fairly like that (R vs D), but we’ve been hard at work making “battle lines” for various issues. Abortion vs Non, Homosexual vs heterosexual. And so forth.  
How did you prove you were human? Did it involve a CT scan when someone found out you were homosexual?

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> He’s saying people only started dividing themselves into little groups about 25 years ago. Before that, everybody agreed we were all one species and held hands while singing “Kumbaya.”

I’m not saying we were one race of love and tolerance, but issues are being framed more simplistically around talking points. I use 25 years because we started doing it to these issues in the mid eightiess (which I guess is 30 years, now) as we lost the political cash cow of “us vs communism.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)
#### Post date: [February 24, 2014, 11:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766/231 "2014-02-24T23:25:39Z")

</div>

> [@magellan01](#):
>
> For marriage you just need one male and one female. That’s it. The coming together of man and woman is race/skin color agnostic.

You do realize, I hope, that you’re simply defining the problem away instead of exploring it. Just like you pretend that banning same-sex couples from using the word “married” does not make them second-class citizens.

But, after all these discussions, you’re obviously not going to be convinced by mere argument. Just recognize that you’re in a shrinking minority that future generations are going to wonder about.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![lance\_strongarm](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/87869e/32.png) [@lance\_strongarm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lance_strongarm)
#### Post date: [February 24, 2014, 11:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766/232 "2014-02-24T23:27:16Z")

</div>

> [@Farin](#):
>
> they don’t practice the same sexuality as you, why should that mean they get treated differently than you?

Here’s where I come in and keep you on your toes and ask you if you support the right of polygamous marriage.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Farin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/e79b87/32.png) [@Farin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Farin)
#### Post date: [February 24, 2014, 11:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766/233 "2014-02-24T23:29:31Z")

</div>

> [@lance\_strongarm](#):
>
> Here’s where I come in and keep you on your toes and ask you if you support the right of polygamous marriage.

Yes. My only hold up are the lawful determinations of inheritance and such for the social side of things. (Does it stay with the genetic parents, the married group’s assets at time of conception, drawn lots?, etc)

ETA: I support ADULT polygamy. Any sort of “14 is old enough” I don’t support.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)
#### Post date: [February 24, 2014, 11:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766/234 "2014-02-24T23:50:17Z")

</div>

> [@Farin](#):
>
> It’s the binary classification of “with us or against us” that we have fallen into.

But he is, in fact, against me. He’s lobbied, successfully, to restrict my civil rights, based purely on my sexuality. There’s an “us and them” dynamic at play here, and it’s not the gays who instituted it.

Good job on blaming the victims for standing up for their rights, though. You’re a peach.

> [@](#):
>
> How did you prove you were human? Did it involve a CT scan when someone found out you were homosexual?

Neither cute, nor amusing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![lance\_strongarm](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/87869e/32.png) [@lance\_strongarm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lance_strongarm)
#### Post date: [February 25, 2014, 12:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766/235 "2014-02-25T00:21:10Z")

</div>

> [@Farin](#):
>
> Yes. My only hold up are the lawful determinations of inheritance and such for the social side of things. (Does it stay with the genetic parents, the married group’s assets at time of conception, drawn lots?, etc)

Cool.

Now, when do we demand that?

> [@](#):
>
> ETA: I support ADULT polygamy. Any sort of “14 is old enough” I don’t support.

That goes without saying. Much like the fact that gays aren’t pedophiles goes without saying.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![lance\_strongarm](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/87869e/32.png) [@lance\_strongarm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lance_strongarm)
#### Post date: [February 25, 2014, 12:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766/236 "2014-02-25T00:23:32Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> But he is, in fact, against me. He’s lobbied, successfully, to restrict my civil rights, based purely on my sexuality.

I ought to ask you the polygamy question too.

Do you support the right of polygamous groups to marry?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![andros](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e480ec/32.png) [@andros](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/andros)
#### Post date: [February 25, 2014, 12:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766/237 "2014-02-25T00:32:11Z")

</div>

> [@lance\_strongarm](#):
>
> I ought to ask you the polygamy question too.
> 
> Do you support the right of polygamous groups to marry?

I’m not **Miller** , but I certainly do.

Now, what’s your point with the polygamy angle and how is it relevant?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)
#### Post date: [February 25, 2014, 12:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766/238 "2014-02-25T00:44:46Z")

</div>

> [@lance\_strongarm](#):
>
> I ought to ask you the polygamy question too.
> 
> Do you support the right of polygamous groups to marry?

Read the thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Farin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/e79b87/32.png) [@Farin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Farin)
#### Post date: [February 25, 2014, 12:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766/239 "2014-02-25T00:47:43Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> But he is, in fact, against me. He’s lobbied, successfully, to restrict my civil rights, based purely on my sexuality. There’s an “us and them” dynamic at play here, and it’s not the gays who instituted it.
> 
> Good job on blaming the victims for standing up for their rights, though. You’re a peach.

You mistake the people I am annoyed with. It’s not the non-heterosexual crowds who have done the injury, it’s the heterosexual crowds who have gone “They aren’t _like me_ and thus they are bad. They are _them_.”

And I hate that sort of tribalism. There is no reason to exclude based upon anything that isn’t harmful to another person, as has been done to the non-heterosexual community for quite some time.

> [@Miller](#):
>
> Neither cute, nor amusing.

Then I plainly apologize. I simply find the fact that you have to somehow prove your humanity disgusting. My disgust tends to come out as attempts at sarcastic humor.

> [@lance armstrong](#):
>
> Cool.
> 
> Now, when do we demand that?

Like I said: As soon as we can discover a socially acceptable way to deal with inheritance and other factors. The binary relationship is comparatively easy. You had two parents, they are your guardians. If they split, both are responsible. Child support and all of that grows out of it. A homosexual couple fits into this quite nicely.

In a trinary+ relationship, if one of the three+ parents leave, are they responsible for child care in the same way a divorced binary couple is? Does it only matter if the person who leaves the relationship was a blood relation of the child? Do we structure it in a way that two are still the primary responsibility holders, possibly creating a situation where that duo leaves and causes issues with the child?

It’s a big question. I prefer caution when child welfare is involved. I’d hate to create a generation of trauma victims if we stumble this sort of allowance as a society too badly.

> [@lance armstrong](#):
>
> That goes without saying. Much like the fact that gays aren’t pedophiles goes without saying.

I’ve been in this discussion, before, and my support for polygamy has, multiple times, been extended to de-facto support for the Mormon polygamy that practices young marriage. I just wanted to head this possible line off at the pass.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Melchior](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e5b9ba/32.png) [@Melchior](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Melchior)
#### Post date: [February 25, 2014, 1:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766/240 "2014-02-25T01:49:42Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> Yeah, I kinda picked up on that.
> 
> Yes, but those people are a minority. Most people think SSM should be legalized.
> 
> Flimsy? Anti-marriage laws cost [this woman](http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/11/nyregion/edith-windsor-gay-widow-revels-in-supreme-court-fight.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0) over 300,000 dollars. Can you present an argument why she should have to pay over a quarter of a million dollars just because the person she spent her life with was another woman?

It’s ta law that needs to be changed. Duh. You should be able to appoint heirs. Where was their estate attorney?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Melchior](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e5b9ba/32.png) [@Melchior](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Melchior)
#### Post date: [February 25, 2014, 1:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766/241 "2014-02-25T01:53:19Z")

</div>

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> I - and probably dozens of other people - already explained this to you.
> 
> You don’t know what a strawman argument is. It’s too late to spare yourself from embarrassment, but you should still stop using the term.

I have a degree in philosophy and know more about fallacies than the lot of you put together!

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766.md?page=11)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-should-i-care-about-gay-marriage/681766.md?page=13)
