Yes I live in Ontario and despite it’s Seattle like qualities I’ve never seen bag recycling areas in our grocery stores. Would you agree with Voyager that they don’t get much use?
You’re seeing some strange reusable bags if they cost $2 but only last a few trips. The reusable bags I’m thinking of, and probably what most people here are thinking of, are made of canvas and last for several years of repeated use.
You don’t have to use special shopping bags, anyway: you can use rucksacks/backpacks, sports bags, cardboard boxes, anything. I find it hard to believe you don’t have some of those in your home. Rucksacks are one of the best way to carry shopping anyway.
Anyone who really, really loves plastic shopping bags ike the kind you get in shops, and wants to continue using them for their trash bags or whatever, can order them online themselves and pay far less than shops charge them. This takes a bit of planning and a minor outlay (like $2) and I guess that could be beyond some people, so they’d just have to use rucksacks for shopping and normal waste paper bags, which hold more than plastic shopping bags anyway so work out cheaper, for trash.
My response was to the poster suggesting that I throw surplus bags into the recycling bin. In many communities, including the ones I’ve lived in, plastic bags are not accepted in domestic recycling bins, most likely because of sorting problems. As for the ones in store, I don’t recall ever seeing one. They may well exist but they certainly aren’t prominent and so are probably not widely used – nor are the current bags I have around printed with any such information. I agree with Voyager …
The fact of the matter is, where plastic bags are used, some non-trivial amount of them will get into all aspects of the environment – landfills, waterways, oceans. The best solution is not having them.
OK, that’s the best solution.
But a better solution than giving them out free, is giving them out for a small fee, which has the effect of reducing use. Agreed?
The plastic bags I get from the store are a little under 1/4 ounce and the reusable ones are about 2 ounces. Can’t find my calipers but I can’t imagine your doggy bags are thinner than a standard grocery bag. There are different grades of course.
We used to use our shopping bags to line small waste bins and to dispose of cat litter. Bags became chargeable in Scotland a few months ago and the supply at home ran out as we started using the reuse bags we had previously bought and often forgotten!. I bought a box of 40 economy bin liners for £1.80 to do the previous jobs. They were thinner and smaller than Tesco shopping bags which cost 5p each (money going to charity).
I have now started using 5p bags again for shopping!
Because we want to keep as much as possible out of landfill, to extend the life of the sites we have. For our typical week we have 3x as much recycling as trash and also 3x as much organic waste which goes into our green can to be composted - not counting the stuff we bring out to our compost bin. It adds up. But the problem would be less if we could guarantee that all the plastic bags made it to the landfill and stayed there.
Because they are a low hanging fruit. They’re very noticeable as a contributor to street litter, easily substituted with cloth bags, and pretty simple to slap a 5 cent charge.
Wrong. My grandparents own a grocery store some 30 years now. Those costs were factored in a long time ago. Let’s not jump to ignorant conclusions and pull info out of our rears here. Unless you have evidence that some particular store never audited and analyzed what their outgoing costs were and decided to give away bags for free only to later decide to charge for them then your not doing yourself any favors because it’s likely they realized that they are not profiting what they used to so they needed to start charging…nothing is really free.
Not…exactly (although close enough that this is a nitpick, rather than a correction): the fee was collected by the retailer, and was supposed to go to the environmental charity of their choice. One assumes the mayor at the time, David Miller, would have preferred WWF, but he did not advocate for any given charity.
Anecdotally, it seemed to cut down on the number of bags caught in trees. That said, PriceChopper (I think. Whichever grocery store I go to) already charge 5cents per bag, but gave away boxes for free. They continued to charge 5 cents, plus the fee.
I’m honestly baffled why no one at all complains about Price Chopper charging 5 cents, but when the city did, it was a huge deal.
Oh, and the really-very-thin bags that are used to hold meat and vegetables continued to be free; those are fine for picking up pet waste.
I’ll see if I can dig it up (I mean, you were quoting Spacing in the first place, and they are generally fairly accurate). There was a lot of talk about…everything given the amount of money involved, so it is entirely possible I misremembered.