# Why shouldn't we prevent immigration from Muslim countries?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [March 16, 2017, 12:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304 "2017-03-16T12:45:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2017, 6:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304/41 "2017-03-16T18:39:40Z")

</div>

> [@de\_facto\_lies](#):
>
> Its not exactly hyperbole though. The judge ruling against the order in Hawaii used Trumps and Giuliani’s very own words in his argument
> 
> “In its decision, the federal court in Hawaii used Mr Trump’s own words - and the words of his advisers - against him. The text of the executive order, Judge Derrick Watson held, could not be separated from the context of the recent presidential campaign, “Muslim ban” rhetoric and all. An order that discriminates against some Muslims, he continued, is just as legally deficient as one that discriminates against them all.”
> 
> That’s from a BBC article on the revised order being turned down, pretty new to this so not exactly sure how to cite the source yet, please be patient.

Sorry, but it is hyperbole. Saying ‘all’ is incorrect and misleading. Even if this phase goes through (which I doubt but guess we shall see), what Trump is proposing is still only a fraction of all Muslims who immigrate to the US each year. The countries his ban encompasses aren’t the top countries Muslims actually immigrate to the US from each year. That is pretty much the definition of ‘hyperbole’…an exaggerated statement or claim.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![de\_facto\_lies](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ba8739/32.png) [@de\_facto\_lies](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/de_facto_lies)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2017, 6:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304/42 "2017-03-16T18:49:48Z")

</div>

> [@XT](#):
>
> Sorry, but it is hyperbole. Saying ‘all’ is incorrect and misleading. Even if this phase goes through (which I doubt but guess we shall see), what Trump is proposing is still only a fraction of all Muslims who immigrate to the US each year. The countries his ban encompasses aren’t the top countries Muslims actually immigrate to the US from each year. That is pretty much the definition of ‘hyperbole’…an exaggerated statement or claim.

Fair enough, I get what you mean. I would then pose the question, if the judge used hyperbole in his explanation of his decision, how does our usage detract from the argument?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2017, 6:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304/43 "2017-03-16T18:55:49Z")

</div>

> [@de\_facto\_lies](#):
>
> Fair enough, I get what you mean. I would then pose the question, if the judge used hyperbole in his explanation of his decision, how does our usage detract from the argument?

IMHO, we should focus on the fact that the ban pretty obviously targets Muslims. That is easily verifiable and substantiated based on the countries being targeted. Trying to say that we are banning all Muslims, on the other hand, is equally something that one can look up…and can be debunked with little effort. Having been debunked, IMHO, then shifts the whole discussion and can throw into question whether this is important enough, especially to those who don’t look deeply at this. To use an analogy, if one uses hyperbole to claim Climate Change is going to give us a water world nightmare in 50 years (or something along those lines), that’s pretty easy to debunk. That doesn’t mean Climate Change isn’t real or important, however…or that CLIMATE CHANGE itself has been debunked. All the person making the hyperbolic statement has done is give the opposing side an easy way to refute that one claim and throw doubt on the argument.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Icarus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/icarus/32/72_2.png) [@Icarus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Icarus)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2017, 7:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304/44 "2017-03-16T19:03:54Z")

</div>

> [@XT](#):
>
> How does (or do you think) your cite demonstrate that Trump is going to ban all Muslims? For that matter, can you demonstrate that with the ban, phase II it will even ban most Muslims? The numbers don’t look like they are in your favor, but I’m willing to be convinced.

Your post

[QUOTE=XT]  
Trump et al didn’t call for a ban on all Muslims.  
[/QUOTE]

The article quotes Trump as calling for “total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States".

Forgive me if I find your responses to be willfully obtuse and unwilling to see what is right before your eyes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobLibDem](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/boblibdem/32/3149_2.png) [@BobLibDem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BobLibDem)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2017, 7:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304/45 "2017-03-16T19:07:22Z")

</div>

> [@XT](#):
>
> what Trump is proposing is still only a fraction of all Muslims who immigrate to the US each year.

Would it be okay to ban only a fraction of Jews from your golf club? Keep only a fraction of blacks from using your drinking fountain? Bar only a fraction of Hispanics from voting? The idea that you can excuse yourself for attacking a group because you don’t attack every single member is preposterous.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2017, 7:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304/46 "2017-03-16T19:10:51Z")

</div>

> [@Icarus](#):
>
> Your post
> 
> The article quotes Trump as calling for “total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States".
> 
> Forgive me if I find your responses to be willfully obtuse and unwilling to see what is right before your eyes.

Yes…the article says that. And it puts it in quotes too. But if you actually read the article, it’s clear that’s not what’s happening. If you actually look at what Trump et al tried to do in their first cluster fuck as well as what they are trying to do in cluster fuck, phase II it’s also not what’s happening.

So…I guess if you really WANT to try and take what Trump says at face value over what actually was tried and what he is trying again, that’s fine. Forgive me if I don’t take what he says at face value, and that I call what he said ‘hyperbole’ as well as what the poster I questioned as ‘hyperbole’ as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2017, 7:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304/47 "2017-03-16T19:17:03Z")

</div>

> [@BobLibDem](#):
>
> Would it be okay to ban only a fraction of Jews from your golf club? Keep only a fraction of blacks from using your drinking fountain? Bar only a fraction of Hispanics from voting? The idea that you can excuse yourself for attacking a group because you don’t attack every single member is preposterous.

Now THIS is both offensive and ridiculous. You know, folks can actually scroll up and see what I ACTUALLY wrote on this, yes? Again, for anyone who can’t be bothered, the ban is focused on Muslims, plain and simple. The FACT that it doesn’t ban ‘all’ or even ‘most’ Muslims is that it targets only Muslims, and does so by playing on people’s fears of Muslim terrorism. Banning people based on their religious affiliate is wrong…THAT’S THE FUCKING POINT. Saying it is banning ‘all’ Muslims is easily debunked and detracts FROM THE FUCKING POINT. Get it??

All this horseshit about Jews from golf courses and the rest has zero to do with my point, nor does it in any way, shape or form represent what I was getting at (i.e. your attempt to backhandedly portray me as a racist who might agree that, yeah, maybe we SHOULD ban Jews from golf courses, etc etc).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2017, 7:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304/48 "2017-03-16T19:18:43Z")

</div>

> [@XT](#):
>
> Yes…the article says that. And it puts it in quotes too. But if you actually read the article, it’s clear that’s not what’s happening. If you actually look at what Trump et al tried to do in their first cluster fuck as well as what they are trying to do in cluster fuck, phase II it’s also not what’s happening.
> 
> So…I guess if you really WANT to try and take what Trump says at face value over what actually was tried and what he is trying again, that’s fine. Forgive me if I don’t take what he says at face value, and that I call what he said ‘hyperbole’ as well as what the poster I questioned as ‘hyperbole’ as well.

I think this is a semantic argument. As a candidate, Trump called for a total ban on Muslim immigration. As President, he tried to enact a very broad ban on Muslim immigration.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2017, 7:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304/49 "2017-03-16T19:24:32Z")

</div>

> [@Little\_Nemo](#):
>
> I think this is a semantic argument. As a candidate, Trump called for a total ban on Muslim immigration. As President, he tried to enact a very broad ban on Muslim immigration.

I don’t see it that way. He hasn’t tried (nor do I think he could get away with it) a broad ban on all Muslims. He’s tried to do a targeted ban on Muslims from specific countries…none of which are the top countries that Muslims actually come into the US from. What Trump might have SAID, to me, is irrelevent…he says so much bullshit that what you have to do, again IMHO is to see what actually happens. He SAYS Obama wiretapped him…but there is zero evidence this happened. He SAYS a lot of stuff, most of which is a load of horseshit that plays to his base. What he actually tried to DO, however, was not a ban on all Muslims…unless you want to try and define ‘all’ as being ‘all Muslims from 7, and now 6, countries that have Muslim majorities’.

At any rate, I’ll just drop this as it detracts (which was what I was trying to correct and have avoided, but you guys just can’t do that) from the actual point of the thread as well as the point we should be focused on wrt his focused ban on Muslims…which is that this idiot is attempting to ban people based on their religion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hampshire](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hampshire/32/4887_2.png) [@Hampshire](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hampshire)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2017, 7:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304/50 "2017-03-16T19:29:59Z")

</div>

I’ve seen shows like the Duggar’s “19 kids and counting” and if they’re representative of Baptists and how they treat their women I don’t share those values at all.  
Can we get rid of the Baptists?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![octopus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/octopus/32/3716_2.png) [@octopus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/octopus)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2017, 8:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304/51 "2017-03-16T20:13:57Z")

</div>

> [@panache45](#):
>
> Following your reasoning, why don’t we expel people who are already here, if their values aren’t compatible with yours? Let’s strip all racists, sexists, homophobes, anti-semites, etc. of their citizenship and get them the hell out. And once we set that precedent, who will be next?

That’s not a logical conclusion. People who are citizens here have a right to be here. Those who aren’t don’t.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![running\_coach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/running_coach/32/15836_2.png) [@running\_coach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/running_coach)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2017, 8:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304/52 "2017-03-16T20:16:45Z")

</div>

> [@octopus](#):
>
> That’s not a logical conclusion. People who are citizens here have a right to be here. Those who aren’t don’t.

Holders of green cards have a right.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![octopus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/octopus/32/3716_2.png) [@octopus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/octopus)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2017, 8:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304/53 "2017-03-16T20:19:07Z")

</div>

> [@running\_coach](#):
>
> Holders of green cards have a right.

Then they shouldn’t be harassed by border patrol or whatever. I’m not a huge fan of a lot of what government does. However, I don’t have an issue with legally enforcing border security.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tamerlane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tamerlane/32/7602_2.png) [@Tamerlane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tamerlane)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2017, 8:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304/54 "2017-03-16T20:19:46Z")

</div>

> [@running\_coach](#):
>
> Trump called for a ban on all Muslims. Can’t be more direct than that.

> [@XT](#):
>
> You know, hyperbole really detracts from your argument. Basically, Trump et al didn’t call for a ban on all Muslims.

Sorry **XT** , but you are completely wrong on this one. You may want to ignore what he [said](https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trump-statement-on-preventing-muslim-immigration) in the recent past and instead focus on what he tried to do. But he did say what he said, so technically you are incorrect.

Beyond technicalities I think both what he says and what he tries to do are equally important. The first is a window into what he wants\*, the second merely what he thinks he can get.

ETA: \* If you really want to give him the benefit of the doubt, perhaps what he _wanted_. But I’m not feeling that generous at the moment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![furryman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/furryman/32/99_2.png) [@furryman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/furryman)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2017, 8:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304/55 "2017-03-16T20:27:44Z")

</div>

This country is filled with the descendants of people fleeing religious oppression. Why should we discriminate against people just because they belong to this one religion?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2017, 8:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304/56 "2017-03-16T20:30:56Z")

</div>

> [@Tamerlane](#):
>
> Sorry **XT** , but you are completely wrong on this one. You may want to ignore what he [said](https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trump-statement-on-preventing-muslim-immigration) in the recent past and instead focus on what he tried to do. But he did say what he said, so technically you are incorrect.
> 
> Beyond technicalities I think both what he says and what he tries to do are equally important. The first is a window into what he wants\*, the second merely what he thinks he can get.
> 
> ETA: \* If you really want to give him the benefit of the doubt, perhaps what he _wanted_. But I’m not feeling that generous at the moment.

I don’t want to give him anything, including the benefit of any doubt. I have no doubts that if he COULD ban all Muslims he would. However, in the name of putting this to rest and in all fairness to and every poster who has commented on this, save Bob who’s post still offends, I’ll concede…I was wrong. running coach said ‘Trump called for a ban on all Muslims. Can’t be more direct than that’, and that is true, not hyperbole…he did call for that, even if, as with many of his statements, he’s walked it back (he took it off his website for instance) and in reality didn’t try and actually do this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elbows](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/b3f665/32.png) [@elbows](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elbows)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2017, 9:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304/57 "2017-03-16T21:00:43Z")

</div>

It’s equally true to say that he did, in fact, try to do _some version_ of this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![clairobscur](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/839c29/32.png) [@clairobscur](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/clairobscur)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2017, 9:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304/58 "2017-03-16T21:49:30Z")

</div>

> [@Emergency911](#):
>
> The second thing is that the ban isn’t forever, its temporary, but I see the temporary ban as a way to quicken the response from the country to make it right. […] So if the US doesn’t stop the immigration from the countries that aren’t helping us make sure we aren’t letting in dangerous people, the same country can continue to ignore the requests from the US. We stop them from coming in, now the other countries have to take action to get us to allow it again.

I don’t think this country (whichever it is) has any interest in you letting their citizens immigrate. Probably the contrary in most cases. So, there’s no reason why you banning them from entering would bother this country the slighest bit, or would make it take action.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wolfpup](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wolfpup/32/10618_2.png) [@wolfpup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wolfpup)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2017, 10:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304/59 "2017-03-16T22:07:50Z")

</div>

One could write an entire book in response to the OP’s question, so I’ll go in the opposite direction and condense it down to its essence: because judging individual people based on the putative characteristics of an entire class, be it race, religion, or national origin, is the essential definition of bigotry.

The corollary to that is that both the US and Canada were founded on the principles of welcoming immigrants from diverse places and cultures, and became great nations in large part on the strength of it. Conversely, from time to time the idea has taken hold that some races and cultures are “better” than others, and this has never ended well.

If the current “Muslim ban” should remind us of anything, it’s that any policy that has bigotry at its core – however well-intentioned it may be – is bound to demonstrate overt bigotry sooner or later. We see it already in students, scientists, engineers, and ordinary innocent people on holiday being harassed and turned away for no other reason than because of what they look like or where they or their parents were born. It happens because the legitimization of bigotry emboldens not just rural hillbillies, but government officials right down the line of authority.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marshmallow](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/df705f/32.png) [@marshmallow](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/marshmallow)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2017, 12:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304/60 "2017-03-17T00:53:51Z")

</div>

The mercenary reason to accept immigrants, Muslim or otherwise, is to poach smart people from other countries. There’s a reason the tech industry pushed back against the ban.

As for the worry that in the future there will be enclaves of Muslims creating second and third generation domestic terrorists a la Europe, well, the security state is always on the look out for more rationalizations for curtailing rights, consider this a freebie.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-shouldnt-we-prevent-immigration-from-muslim-countries/782304.md?page=4)
