# Why threatening to go to war with Denmark may be a bad idea

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Tags:** trump\
**Created:** [January 20, 2026, 3:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838 "2026-01-20T03:32:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Horatius](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/horatius/32/3572_2.png) [@Horatius](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Horatius)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2026, 4:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838/41 "2026-01-20T16:10:16Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> And if that change happens because diabetic Americans are terrified about their insulin, _that’s fine_. I don’t give a goddamn why they change their minds; any pressure on them to do so is good.

And this is the reason why we should point out this reason for not going to war. There are a whole lot of Americans who can’t wrap their heads around history, or geopolitical maneuvering, or other complex topics. MAGA, for instance. But maybe they _can_ wrap their heads around “If you do this, they cut off your drugs, moron.”

It’s clear that MAGA will not respond to coherent, well-thought out arguments that consider every aspect of the situation, because none of that has worked despite nearly a decade of us explaining it to them. So we might as well try the simplistic appeal to their own needs. Can’t really make things worse, and it might make things better.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![puzzlegal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/puzzlegal/32/3827_2.png) [@puzzlegal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/puzzlegal)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2026, 4:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838/42 "2026-01-20T16:11:01Z")

</div>

The joke is that he played Risk at some point, and is executing the North America strategy in that game. I guess that means Iceland is next.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gordon\_G](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/3da27b/32.png) [@Gordon\_G](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gordon_G)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2026, 4:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838/43 "2026-01-20T16:11:51Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> No, I was asking why the _Chinese_ would care about the North Atlantic Treaty Org? The non-US members aren’t exactly relevant to them militarily.

FWIW it was never my intention to reply to your post. I think I clicked the wrong “Reply” icon.

I did think the article from the Russian newspaper I quoted should be of interest. It’s almost TOO perfect an example of trying to influence a silly incompetent President. Did that really appear in a Russian newspaper or is that _fake news_?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2026, 4:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838/44 "2026-01-20T16:12:00Z")

</div>

> [@Horatius](#):
>
> But maybe they _can_ wrap their heads around “If you do this, they cut off your drugs, moron.”

Probably goes without saying, but please leave off the last word. It may be true that they’re dumb as a box of rocks, but it’s far more important to bring them along than it is to vent spleen. I am convinced that there’s a nontrivial number of folks who could be persuaded to leave the cult if we can convince them that they’ll be welcomed for doing so.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![solost](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/solost/32/11776_2.png) [@solost](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/solost)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2026, 4:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838/45 "2026-01-20T16:19:41Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> Surely at least 2% of Republicans in the House know that this is batshit insane and risks another world war. But they’re scared. They need to put on their big kid pants and show some courage.

Yes, I completely agree, and I don’t believe even the cowaRds in Congress would allow it if trump tries to go the ‘legal’ route and get permission. But what if trump just goes ahead and gives the order to invade Greenland without informing Congress, like he just did with the Venezuelan action? That might spur Congress to take action against trump after the fact, and maybe an impeachment would be followed by an actual conviction in the Senate in that case. But by then, the damage will have already been done.

I wonder how that would go down if trump bypassed Congress and decided to go ahead and give the military the order to invade Greenland. Would the generals go along with it, or refuse the order? Attacking a NATO ally would seem to be the very definition of an unlawful order. If the generals refused, what then?

Worse yet, if the generals complied, what then? Are we in a full-on war with our NATO allies? I assume that then Europe would also take drastic economic actions which would cripple our economy. Russia and China would be gleefully watching from the sidelines, ready to take advantage of the chaos and power vacuum. It would make a shit-show boring by comparison.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Love\_Rhombus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/love_rhombus/32/10694_2.png) [@Love\_Rhombus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Love_Rhombus)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2026, 6:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838/46 "2026-01-20T18:12:54Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> if we can convince them that they’ll be welcomed for doing so.

This is a struggle for me personally, because a large part of me would gleefully shout FAFO to them, They made their beds, now sleep in it. I know that’s a childish and unhelpful impulse, but it’s a pretty common one and it will be hard to overcome for many people.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2026, 6:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838/47 "2026-01-20T18:26:43Z")

</div>

Also, it’s kind of contemptibly timid and snowflakey for MAGA types experiencing buyer’s remorse to be unwilling to face up to their actions unless they get an assurance that they’re pre-forgiven.

_“Yes I supported a bunch of stupid and evil wannabe dictators doing a shit-ton of irresponsible and harmful stuff, but if I go over to the other side then somebody might make me feel bad about my previous support, so I guess I’ve got no choice but to go on supporting them!”_

Look, I get that that’s a very human and universal form of frailty, but it sits especially ill on those swaggering would-be tough-guy conservatives who’ve been constantly chest-thumping about how courageous and rugged they are. “Party of Personal Responsibility”, my ass.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2026, 6:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838/48 "2026-01-20T18:28:30Z")

</div>

> [@Kimstu](#):
>
> “Party of Personal Responsibility”, my ass.

I think it has been conveniently reinterpreted as “Party of responsibility to my person only”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![duality72](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/duality72/32/3910_2.png) [@duality72](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/duality72)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2026, 8:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838/49 "2026-01-20T20:19:38Z")

</div>

> [@Love\_Rhombus](#):
>
> This is a struggle for me personally, because a large part of me would gleefully shout FAFO to them, They made their beds, now sleep in it. I know that’s a childish and unhelpful impulse, but it’s a pretty common one and it will be hard to overcome for many people.

I know what you mean here, but I’ll disagree somewhat that this is an unhelpful impulse. I believe that one of the biggest mistakes liberals make is to protect people from the consequences of their own actions and thus they never learn to change their ways or thinking. Often this is because the consequences don’t just fall on those responsible so the best thing to do is to protect everyone, especially in an increasingly interconnected world, but that feeling that people should be allowed to play stupid games and win stupid prizes isn’t entirely incorrect.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2026, 9:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838/50 "2026-01-20T21:05:29Z")

</div>

I get that it grates, and I get that people should face the consequences for their actions. However, those are not the cards in play right now. I would far rather have people remove their support from Trump without consequence, than continue to support Trump for fear of the consequences.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2026, 9:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838/51 "2026-01-20T21:21:14Z")

</div>

I think that conservatives who are forced to do without their meds will face the consequences of their actions regardless of whether we call them stupid.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2026, 9:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838/52 "2026-01-20T21:24:42Z")

</div>

I get what you mean, but the split of diabetics in America between liberals and conservatives is probably close to 50-50. If America went to war with Denmark and Denmark cut off insulin to the USA as a result, it’s not just MAGA diabetics who’d suffer.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![duality72](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/duality72/32/3910_2.png) [@duality72](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/duality72)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2026, 11:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838/53 "2026-01-20T23:18:33Z")

</div>

All true and I’m sure we all agree this is not the occasion to give in to that urge. I’m just saying that the general notion of “let them FAFO then” is neither childish nor unhelpful and needs to be incorporated into liberal thought.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kolak\_of\_Twilo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kolak_of_twilo/32/73_2.png) [@Kolak\_of\_Twilo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kolak_of_Twilo)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2026, 4:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838/54 "2026-01-21T04:49:10Z")

</div>

> [@puzzlegal](#):
>
> The joke is that he played Risk at some point, and is executing the North America strategy in that game. I guess that means Iceland is next.

The joke is also that Trump’s newly appointed Ambassador to Iceland [was “joking” last week that Iceland will be the 52nd state and he will be the governor.](https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/us-ambassador-iceland-trump-9.7048349) The Icelandic public is not laughing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![puzzlegal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/puzzlegal/32/3827_2.png) [@puzzlegal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/puzzlegal)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2026, 4:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838/55 "2026-01-21T04:50:27Z")

</div>

I thought ambassadors were supposed to be diplomatic. WTF?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PhillyGuy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ed655f/32.png) [@PhillyGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PhillyGuy)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2026, 5:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838/56 "2026-01-21T05:26:56Z")

</div>

> [@Alessan](#):
>
> Not to mention that a future president will give it back. The next Democrat elected, certainly, but almost any Republican that succeeds him, too. Even Vance, probably - he may be evil and weak, but he’s not crazy. The United States’ occupation of Greenland will be remembered as a short, embarrassing period in American history.

Right now, American annexation of Greenland polls poorly in the U.S. But this is under circumstances where lots of Americans imagine conquest would require a difficult war.

Suppose the war ends in a short decisive American victory, as seems highly plausible to me. U.S. public opinion will then turn. Giving Greenland its freedom would be morally and strategically correct but, in the U.S., politically disastrous.

The most recent precedent I recall, where a country conquered another and quickly gave it back despite no military necessity, is with the Mongols withdrawing from Europe in 1241 after the Khan died. In modern times, it works differently.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![scudsucker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/scudsucker/32/14101_2.png) [@scudsucker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/scudsucker)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2026, 5:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838/57 "2026-01-21T05:55:41Z")

</div>

Somewhat tongue in cheek, but the reason I would not go to war with Denmark is because the Danes are descendents of Vikings. I only know very few, but I would not take them on in a bar fight, let alone in a snowy, rocky land mass in which they would be in their element.

Not to mention the native Greenlandic people, who would be able to fight a guerrilla war like the Finnish in WW2… It would be a disaster for the US in every possible way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PatrickLondon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/patricklondon/32/4422_2.png) [@PatrickLondon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PatrickLondon)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2026, 10:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838/58 "2026-01-21T10:23:48Z")

</div>

And here’s another potential sanction if it should come to it:

> **[Why the US is buying icebreakers from Finland](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0q48d71ke8o)**
>
> The Nordic nation leads the way when it comes to both the design and construction of the vessels.

> **[Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Authorizes Construction of Arctic...](https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/10/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-authorizes-construction-of-arctic-security-cutters/)**
>
> GROWING OUR ARCTIC FLEET: President Donald J. Trump has signed a Presidential Memorandum to authorize the construction of up to four Arctic Security

Suppose the Finns decided to give them to Denmark and/or Greenland…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Folacin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/folacin/32/3195_2.png) [@Folacin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Folacin)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2026, 2:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838/59 "2026-01-21T14:25:22Z")

</div>

> [@scudsucker](#):
>
> Not to mention the native Greenlandic people, who would be able to fight a guerrilla war like the Finnish in WW2… It would be a disaster for the US in every possible way.

I just don’t think there are enough Greenlanders to fight a guerrilla war, nor do they have enough inhabitable area to hide in and stage attacks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2026, 2:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838/60 "2026-01-21T14:29:27Z")

</div>

> [@Kimstu](#):
>
> I mean, I think it’s as simple as pointing out that there is no possible aspect or scenario in which threatening to go to war with Denmark is a **good** idea.

Not for the United States or Denmark or Greenland or western Europe. But there are obviously countries which will benefit if Trump breaks up NATO.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-threatening-to-go-to-war-with-denmark-may-be-a-bad-idea/1026838.md?page=4)
