# Why WASN'T Osama Bin Laden Armed?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [May 5, 2011, 6:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820 "2011-05-05T06:48:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2011, 3:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820/21 "2011-05-05T15:16:17Z")

</div>

> [@Oakminster](#):
>
> I’m starting to think that we shot him in cold blood. And I’m ok with that. When you corner a rattlesnake, you shoot it in the head.

Starting to think that? It was clear as glass as soon as Panetta said it was a “kill mission” a day or two ago. Keep in mind that the other option was to blow him to smitherenes with bombs from a predator drone. There is no difference between doing that and shooting him “in cold blood”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gonzomax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e8c25b/32.png) [@gonzomax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gonzomax)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2011, 3:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820/22 "2011-05-05T15:19:22Z")

</div>

It was assassination.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Oakminster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/77aa72/32.png) [@Oakminster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Oakminster)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2011, 3:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820/23 "2011-05-05T15:20:30Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> Starting to think that? It was clear as glass as soon as Panetta said it was a “kill mission” a day or two ago.

Not necessarily. I would have expected him to resist violently, and go down in a “blaze of glory”, so I found reports of him putting up some level of fight credible at first.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scot\_Dutch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bb73d2/32.png) [@Scot\_Dutch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scot_Dutch)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2011, 3:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820/24 "2011-05-05T15:54:52Z")

</div>

As Marley stated above, the most current story is he had an AK and sidearm in the room.

But the theme of the OP’s question is fair. If I was OBL I would be taking an AK to the shitter with me, and would certainly be armed and ready during an obvious raid.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ale](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/f19dbf/32.png) [@Ale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ale)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2011, 4:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820/25 "2011-05-05T16:00:57Z")

</div>

> [@brocks](#):
>
> I just watched Nightline, which reported that the Seals used stealth helicopters, which the neighbors said they didn’t hear until they were almost directly overhead. So that cuts the time Osama had to grab a gun from maybe 3-5 minutes to more like two minutes. Still seems like plenty of time.

The helicopters are a big mystery, I wonder if I should open a thread in General Questions about them…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gonzomax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e8c25b/32.png) [@gonzomax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gonzomax)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2011, 4:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820/26 "2011-05-05T16:02:29Z")

</div>

He has been living in plain sight for years. He expected if a raid was coming the Pakistani military would have warned him before it happened. That is why we dealt them out. That is why it worked.  
Now the Pakistani leaders are shocked, just shocked that Osama was living a couple miles from a military academy in a garrisoned city. Seems like Casablanca.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RedFury](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/ec9cab/32.png) [@RedFury](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RedFury)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2011, 4:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820/27 "2011-05-05T16:03:14Z")

</div>

> [@Oakminster](#):
>
> Not necessarily. I would have expected him to resist violently, and go down in a “blaze of glory”, so I found reports of him putting up some level of fight credible at first.

Go with your second thought:

[**Bin Laden ‘firefight’: Only one man was armed**](http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42906279/ns/world_news-death_of_bin_laden)

Most of the original embellishment is quickly falling by the wayside. Whether one agrees with the use of hit squads or not is a different debate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2011, 4:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820/28 "2011-05-05T16:04:28Z")

</div>

[Some commentary on the changes in reporting about bin Laden.](http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/weigel/archive/2011/05/05/so-did-bin-laden-have-a-gun-or-didn-t-he.aspx) He attributes the changes to assumptions made by journalists, not what the government has said in particular.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RedFury](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/ec9cab/32.png) [@RedFury](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RedFury)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2011, 4:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820/29 "2011-05-05T16:10:30Z")

</div>

> [@Ale](#):
>
> The helicopters are a big mystery, I wonder if I should open a thread in General Questions about them…

Just a quickie on that point. Anyone know the range of these choppers? 'cause [Abbottabad](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pakistan_location_map.svg) is a long way from the ocean and I haven’t read any reports of any other means of transport to get his body there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2011, 4:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820/30 "2011-05-05T16:22:35Z")

</div>

They were supposedly modified Blackhawks, which means their range is about 800 miles. Even if they were stripped of everything but extra fuel tanks, there’s no way they could have deployed directly from a ship.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Man\_In\_Black](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/bcef8e/32.png) [@The\_Man\_In\_Black](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Man_In_Black)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2011, 4:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820/31 "2011-05-05T16:23:01Z")

</div>

So he wasn;t armed? So what? In the US at least, if an unarmed suspect makes a move to attack a police officer, the officer is well in the right to shoot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2011, 4:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820/32 "2011-05-05T16:23:49Z")

</div>

How is that relevant?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RedFury](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/ec9cab/32.png) [@RedFury](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RedFury)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2011, 4:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820/33 "2011-05-05T16:30:43Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> They were supposedly modified Blackhawks, which means their range is about 800 miles. Even if they were stripped of everything but extra fuel tanks, there’s no way they could have deployed directly from a ship.

Thank you. But again, doesn’t that mean that disposing of OBL’s body at sea was beyond [their range](http://ranasami123.tripod.com/id35.html)?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2011, 4:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820/34 "2011-05-05T16:43:04Z")

</div>

> [@RedFury](#):
>
> Just a quickie on that point. Anyone know the range of these choppers? 'cause [Abbottabad](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pakistan_location_map.svg) is a long way from the ocean and I haven’t read any reports of any other means of transport to get his body there.

I thought I read that they were launched from just across the border in Afghanistan.

> [@Oakminster](#):
>
> Not necessarily. I would have expected him to resist violently, and go down in a “blaze of glory”, so I found reports of him putting up some level of fight credible at first.

I wouldn’t believe anything the government tells us about the details of this raid. It would not surprise me one bit if he did put up a fight, and we just don’t want his followers to think he died fighting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2011, 4:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820/35 "2011-05-05T16:44:47Z")

</div>

> [@RedFury](#):
>
> Thank you. But again, doesn’t that mean that disposing of OBL’s body at sea was beyond [their range](http://ranasami123.tripod.com/id35.html)?

Wherever they took off from, they returned to a ship at some point, and OBL’s body was tossed off the ship, not out of one of the choppers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Oakminster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/77aa72/32.png) [@Oakminster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Oakminster)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2011, 4:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820/36 "2011-05-05T16:53:25Z")

</div>

> [@RedFury](#):
>
> Thank you. But again, doesn’t that mean that disposing of OBL’s body at sea was beyond [their range](http://ranasami123.tripod.com/id35.html)?

Not necessarily. I believe, but am not certain, that it is possible to extend their range via aerial refueling.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2011, 4:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820/37 "2011-05-05T16:57:53Z")

</div>

Some Blackhawk variants have refueling probes, but it would have been rather tricky to send a USAF tanker into Pakistani airspace.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2011, 5:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820/38 "2011-05-05T17:00:51Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> Some Blackhawk variants have refueling probes, but it would have been rather tricky to send a USAF tanker into Pakistani airspace.

The mission was launched from Afghanistan, not that far from Abottabad. They could have flown him back to that same base, and then flown him by jet to a carrier in the Arabian Sea. I don’t see why everyone thinks the Blackhawks started and finished on the ocean.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![theR](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/977dab/32.png) [@theR](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/theR)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2011, 5:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820/39 "2011-05-05T17:20:43Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> The mission was launched from Afghanistan, not that far from Abottabad. They could have flown him back to that same base, and then flown him by jet to a carrier in the Arabian Sea. I don’t see why everyone thinks the Blackhawks started and finished on the ocean.

And you having to correct people on this is a perfect example why the story keeps changing.

There seem to be four areas where the description of events can change. The first is coming from the military. As they go through after-action reports and learn more, they are going to report differences in what they think happened versus what was initially reported. Being human rather than supermen that do no wrong, they may also withhold or edit information to spin the facts in a way that shows their mission in the best possible light.

Then the White House relays some of that information to the press, sometimes changing previous reports. Also being human, there is spin and decisions to withhold information for both legitimate operational reasons and public relations reasons.

Then press reports what they were told, sometimes correctly and sometimes not. Although most reporters will try to report factually, they are once again humans that may get facts wrong, make incorrect assumptions, or read things into the official reports that weren’t actually there.

Finally, a bunch of people that have read various news stories make assumptions instead of going back to actually check what was reportedly. All the reports I read said very clearly that the mission was launched from Afghanistan, unless they made no mention of it at all. This is one of the “facts” that I have not seen change, yet people are still getting it wrong. It’s very easy to see why the story keeps changing. In some cases, it is actually changing, and in other cases people just think it’s changing because of incorrect interpretations or assumptions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2011, 5:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820/40 "2011-05-05T17:20:45Z")

</div>

Because in the other thread lots of people are alleging that the mission was launched from the _USS Carl Vinson_.

ETA: that was in response to **JM** ’s post.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-wasnt-osama-bin-laden-armed/580820.md?page=3)
