Why Won't FDA Test Herbs and Stuff?

From the same article.

Utah county where Brigham Young University is located, is home to Nu Skin and numerous other MLM companies.

Utah has one of the highest rates of participation in MLM’s. There is a number of reasons for that, one is that women are encouraged to stay home and not work, so working for a MLM is an attractive option. Most of the men have had sales experience as missionaries, and have learned how to put on a happy face even when people are rejecting your product. And from here.

My bolding.

So for Hatch, it was a simple matter of following the money.

Under the Unapproved Drugs Initiative started in 2006 the FDA encouraged drug manufacturers to test older drugs which had never been properly tested for safety and efficacy under FDA protocols. One of these drugs, colchicine, was derived from the mountain saffron plant, which had been used to treat inflammation since 1500 B.C. and had been isolated since 1820.

Testing a drug like this is expensive, and in order to incentivize drug companies to run the tests the FDA allowed them a three year exclusive market in the drug. Overnight a drug which had cost literally pennies per pill went up to $5.00 a pill. Many patients on long term prophylaxis regimes saw their annual costs go from less than $10.00 a year to $3,600.00 per year.

Sorry, too late to make a long story short. Anyway, this points out the problem with herbal treatments. Who is going to pay for testing? Suppose cinnamon does improve blood sugar regulation in diabetics? I don’t need FDA approval to buy cinnamon, I can get a big bottle of it a Costco for a few dollars. There’s no incentive for people to test these herbs because there’s not a captive market. If it did work, and the FDA did give someone exclusive market rights, how am I going to make my Snickerdoodles?

IANAL, but what does the Hatch Act have to do with any of this? I thought that was the law regarding federal employees and their influence on elections.

My mistake, I was referring to the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994, and all subsequent laws and regulations. For which we have Orrin Hatch to blame, though you’re right that it’s not colloquially referred to as “the Hatch Act”.

A long-serving, influential senator will doubtless have multiple bills for which he was the prime mover. There’s more than one “Hatch act”.

I think this is an overstatement. Big Pharma traditionally has been involved in making vitamins, and only recently has started buying up some supplement companies. A huge chunk of the $37 billion-a-year U.S. supplement industry still comprises “independent” companies, from small to mega-players like Herbalife and Shaklee. Multi-level marketing [del]scams[/del] firms remain powerful players.

A reminder that lots of these products are manufactured overseas in places like China and India which are not noted for superb quality control, so we wind up inferior and adulterated supplements (not that the “quality” ones actually work).

And the recalls keep on coming.

It’s been tried; pretty much none of it works.

Once you spend s few billion dollars for essentially no return, it’s questionable if you should spend more digging the same dry hole.

As said, the “natural remedies” that actually worked are conventional medicine now; a famous example being penicillin, derived from a mold. What’s left is the stuff that doesn’t work.

Added note: It is not the job of the FDA to test drugs - manufacturers are responsible for getting them tested, and then FDA expert reviewers go over the evidence in deciding whether they should be approved.

As noted, the DSHEA (spearheaded by the likes of Orrin Hatch and Tom Harkin) has short-circuited this process for supplements, to the glee of supplement companies.

Actually, this is a problem with FDA-approved medications as well. I used to know a lady who had a stroke in her early twenties. She was sure that it was birth control pills that caused it, and if you look at the information sheet that comes with any BCP, you’ll see stroke listed as one of the possible serious “side effects”. She was facing daily migraines of varying intensity for the rest of her life as a result. Despite taking her off The Pill and prescribing migraine cocktails, none of her doctors would agree that it was the pill that caused it. They suggested that perhaps she had a pre-existing, undiagnosed vascular defect in her brain. There was no way to prove it or prove the opposite.

I think the only way to get something taken off the market is if LOTS of people die or are harmed, and the entire population of harmed/killed people can be somehow proven to be the result of the drug in question.

The FDA shouldn’t regulate herbs as drugs, they should be regulated as herbs, like the oregano or paprika in your spice cabinet. This is more of an issue for the FTC or Dept. or Agriculture. What has to be done is some oversight to ensure these herbs contain what they say they do, and they shouldn’t be advertised as having medical benefits. If you want to treat cancer with Old Bay Seasoning and dried parsley flakes go ahead the government shouldn’t stop you.

What amuses me is that the advertisements for these herbal supplements have a statement (apparently required by the FDA) that says, “These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.” And then the ads go on to make what sound very much like claims that the herbal supplement can treat, cure or prevent some disease.

Bill Door, thank you for that view of the other side of the issue.

No. There is more than one act for which Orrin Hatch was the primary sponsor, but there are only two Hatch Acts, neither of which has anything to do with him. One dates from 1939 and was sponsored by Carl Hatch - no relation - and prohibits federal employees from engaging in certain political activity. The other is from 1887 and funded agricultural research. Nobody has ever called the DSHEA “the Hatch Act,” or even an “Hatch Act.”

Wasn’t Virginia’s ex-governor Bob McDonnell tried for taking bribes from at least two supplement companies? Turns out that taking such payments isn’t quite illegal in Virginia but still, the fact there is more than one supplement business paying off politicians should sound some alarms.

Here’s a long article on the subject. Some excerpts:

That’s a long quote from a much longer post, which contains plenty of citations. Orac is nothing if not thorough.

This Quack Miranda Warning only is required if the manufacturer “claims, explicitly or implicitly, that the product… has an effect on a specific disease or class of diseases.”

This. ^^

Yes, some pharmas do own supplement companies - and you’ll find that those supplement companies are among the best-behaved in their industry - Centrum, One-A-Day, etc. Partly, because their parent company actually does real science, and partly because their parent company doesn’t want a festering sore of a lawsuit-target attached to their bottom line. This is not to say that there’s not a lot of hucksterism going on, because there is, but do try to place the blame where it belongs.

Also one I heard last Friday - “has been clinically studied in the treatment of (I think) male testosterone deficiency”. Oddly enough, they didn’t mention the results of the clinical studies.

Regards,
Shodan

These words have very specific, legal meaning. The fact that they can also be used as weasel words isn’t an accident.

Don’t you find it interesting, in light of this statement, that penicillin was discovered by Fleming in the lab? It did not result from testing some witch doctor’s folk remedies.

  • Translation of “glee”: Unabashed reverence for humongous pocketbook enhancement at the expense of people who are wishful, trusting, and sick.

And also “FDA-approved”, which typically means “Thanks to Congress mandating pitifully inadequate supplement regulation, the FDA can’t touch us!”.