Yes, quite well. That way the incident that you shrugged off as unimportant - just standard Presidential politics.
Oh, wait - I misremembered. You did blow a gasket. I must be wrong, and you get upset whenever dirty politics happen. So you blew a gasket when CBS tried to use forged documents to influence the election.
Yeah, that’s probably it.
Don’t even bother with this crap - no one in their right mind believes you, and neither do I.
DNFTT, obviously.
Reid thinks he can spread a nasty lie and get away with it. If Romney shows it to be a lie, so what? Reid is just going to go on to the next lie without skipping a beat.
Or he has and that’s why he’s spinning so furiously.
I just wanted to note that complaining that Reid is lying about Romney is ironically hilarious, given how much Romney is hiding and lying about. He has every right to privacy. More power to him. As long as he’s not auditioning for the most powerful position in the world.
You DO realize that it’s possible he used the tax amnesty program to return money to the U.S. that he was storing offshore ILLEGALLY right? I mean, you do know that is part of the reason people want to see his tax returns? Or is this news to you?
And no, I wouldn’t use shell games and hide my money overseas to pay as little tax as humanly possible if I was a billionaire. I know it’s hard for conservatives/capitalists to picture this, but your greed is not universal.
Reid has “evidence” that a citizen didn’t pay taxes for ten years. And a rich citizen at that! That’s unAmerican, especially since the government could really use that money. so the question is, why is Obama, Holder, and the head of the IRS not doing their job and launching an investigation into Romney’s ten year period of paying no taxes? Not doing so is dereliction of duty. It also send the message that none of us really have to pay our taxes. What the hell is wrong with Obama and his head of the IRS? Why don’t they do their jobs?!!!
This is a serious question, right? I’m not being a smart-aleck here, I just want to be sure.
While I cannot know for sure why no one you mentioned is investigtating the possibility of wrongdoing on Romney’s part, I can undoubtedly say that a legitimate reason for not doing so is no credible evidence has been presented by Reid or anyone else that would justify it. If one wants to criticize Reid, I’m all for it. He ought to be able to back up what he said with something. But trying to bring Obama or Holder into this is ridiculous.
Why do you think that is? Oh—maybe because the IRS is satisfied that they paid what they owed? Hmmm, now who else might fall into that category… ::drums fingers::
Why? I don’t know who the head of the IRS is, but his name should be first, and those other two have the responsibility to make sure people follow the law. If Romney cheated on his taxes, which is the implication, then he should have been prosecuted 6 or 7 years ago. Why didn’t this happen? The obvious reason is that the IRS is satisfied that his return was fine. No? So, either we need to look into why the IRS guy, Obama and Holder haven’t done anything with the tax cheat Romney, or we need to assume that he paid all the taxes he owed.
I don’t really expect that there’s anything ILLEGAL in those tax returns. I just think there’s a lot of stuff that’s going to look REALLY bad to the average person, even if it is legal. So “why doesn’t the IRS look into it?” doesn’t really scan here. Even if there were, the IRS looking into it NOW would look Nixonian. Bad optics for our side.
Which is essentially what I’m saying. Despite what Harry Reid has said, no actual evidence has been presented to support any wrongdoing on Romney’s part, therefore there is no reason that we know of for Obama, the IRS, Holder, or anyone else to open an investigation.
Nonsense. The allegation Reid made was NOT about Romney’s tax payments; it was about a conversation he claims to have had with a Bain investor.
Iggy wants Reid to give up the name of that investor. To tell you the truth, I also want him to do that. If Reid’s is prevented by his “scruples” from revealing who spoke with him about Mitt Romney’s behavior, I expect him to be prevented by those “scruples” from repeating what he was (allegedly) told.
The kind of crap Reid has pulled is something I feel is better left in the karmic ledger of the Republicans. We are supposed to be better than the Republicans. If we can’t manage that, we could at leas strive to be “not as bad.”
It is no secret, nor is it controversial, that his being a member of the Republican Party renders Mitt Romney unsuitable for the Presidency. I would be happier if Senator Reid could confine his message to that fact, and if he feels that he MUST add information to the argument, that he could be completely aboveboard wrt to the sources of that information.
ETA:
Don’t pretty much ALL children have erectile dysfunction (well, all MALE children)? I know I did. Didn’t get over it until I was about eleven or twelve.