# Why would a one-world government be bad?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [November 4, 2004, 12:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877 "2004-11-04T00:18:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![C6541](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/90db22/32.png) [@C6541](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/C6541)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2014, 5:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877/41 "2014-06-08T17:21:15Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> The might be, but they needn’t be.

To be clear I wasn’t suggesting they are, just that many discussions I’ve read between people talking about free trade agreements tend to coalesce around the ideas of either a one world government or a one world economy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![billfish678](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7bcc69/32.png) [@billfish678](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/billfish678)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2014, 5:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877/42 "2014-06-08T17:23:41Z")

</div>

Forget possible tyranny.

What if it gets bloated/inefficient/beauracratic? Which seems to be the natural evolution of such things.

And then, attempts to fix itself are based on theories that don’t work or avoiding the hard choices.

So, eventually the whole word gets bogged down in the mess until there is a world wide revolution and or some level of the collapse of moderns society.

To me that is the real danger and IMO not a low probability one for that matter.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![C6541](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/90db22/32.png) [@C6541](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/C6541)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2014, 5:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877/43 "2014-06-08T17:26:56Z")

</div>

Does a OWG have to be a strong central government? Couldn’t it work like this maybe, regional confederations of states (EU, Eurasion Union, North American Union or things like that) that are finally tied into an international confederation? This would help ensure that each region gets a proportional representation in the government.

However. yes, I think bureaucracy and inefficiency would be much greater under a OWG. However we’d also have to weigh that with potential benefits of a OWG setup.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chessic\_Sense](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/7c8e57/32.png) [@Chessic\_Sense](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chessic_Sense)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2014, 6:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877/44 "2014-06-08T18:44:33Z")

</div>

Damn, people. It’s like you’ve never heard of separatists before. We can’t even get everyone in a single _country_ to agree on a government. What could possibly make a OWG feasible, let alone stable? How are you going to enforce a law that an entire continent hates?

That sort of thing is why we have wars, people.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![psikeyhackr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/97f17d/32.png) [@psikeyhackr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/psikeyhackr)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2014, 7:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877/45 "2014-06-08T19:39:07Z")

</div>

> [@Chessic\_Sense](#):
>
> That sort of thing is why we have wars, people.

Yeah, and how soon will individuals be able to whip up genetically engineered viruses in their basements?

psik

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![C6541](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/90db22/32.png) [@C6541](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/C6541)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2014, 7:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877/46 "2014-06-08T19:47:41Z")

</div>

I was under the impression transgenesis was already being done DIY 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Great\_Antibob](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e47c2d/32.png) [@Great\_Antibob](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Great_Antibob)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2014, 9:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877/47 "2014-06-08T21:25:52Z")

</div>

> [@C6541](#):
>
> To be clear I wasn’t suggesting they are, just that many discussions I’ve read between people talking about free trade agreements tend to coalesce around the ideas of either a one world government or a one world economy.

I could see that as a conspiracy theory, but the reality is probably the opposite.

It’s trite, but Frost wasn’t entirely wrong that good fences make good neighbors. I see free trade agreements more as countries and blocs deciding to be neighborly - with very clearly defined bounds and rules so that everybody can be nice and friendly with the same sort of neighborly prohibitions on taking one step over the line without say-so or else we’ll have to take this to court or the police will have to be called in because of that unfortunate accident with the gardening shears.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2014, 9:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877/48 "2014-06-08T21:35:00Z")

</div>

There’s only one thing I can’t figure out.

Who in their right mind would _want_ to be in charge of running the world?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fuzzy\_wuzzy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/a8b319/32.png) [@Fuzzy\_wuzzy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fuzzy_wuzzy)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2014, 9:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877/49 "2014-06-08T21:41:24Z")

</div>

Because sometimes smaller is better. I dont think it coincidence that many of the best run countries in the world are of a certain population size - Scandanavan countries etc.

A one world government also takes away healthy competion between States. If one State proves it is well run then that is an encouragement to other States to copy/improve on their own running. A poorly run State also become a warning to other States.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stringbean](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/d6d6ee/32.png) [@Stringbean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stringbean)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2014, 9:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877/50 "2014-06-08T21:57:23Z")

</div>

It worked well for Rome.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alessan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alessan/32/465_2.png) [@Alessan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alessan)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2014, 10:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877/51 "2014-06-08T22:00:40Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> There’s only one thing I can’t figure out.
> 
> Who in their right mind would _want_ to be in charge of running the world?

Nobody, Which is why the people who are \*not \*in their right mind would inevitably end up in charge.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chimera](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/8e8cbc/32.png) [@Chimera](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chimera)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2014, 10:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877/52 "2014-06-08T22:07:19Z")

</div>

Reduces local representation.  
Reduces competition.  
Reduces cultural representation and imperatives.

Increases odds of world wide tyranny.  
Bureaucratic rules get increasingly stupid and out of touch (see also: EU)

One size fits all only works to a point, then it becomes counter productive.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrKnowItAll](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrknowitall/32/87_2.png) [@MrKnowItAll](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrKnowItAll)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2014, 10:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877/53 "2014-06-08T22:16:21Z")

</div>

Personally, I think a one world government is inevitable. But it will take time, and have to come into existence gradually. It will probably come from an organization like the UN gradually getting enough power to actually influence the largest/most powerful nations, like the US and China. However, as ease of communication increases and economic forces become more widespread, there will be a gradual homogeneity of world peoples to the point that resistance to a single governing body will be outweighed by a desire for a governing body to level the social differences between one part of the world and another.

A point was made how in science fiction, a one world government was used as a counterpart to alien governments. I don’t think it needs to be that. A global climatological event (man-made or not) could be the impetus to unite. Or perhaps an astronomical calamity. Governments form out of necessity, and they dissolve when their required resources exceed their benefits. The reason that the US is having the troubles it currently suffers is that the perception is that we don’t benefit from it very much. (Remember the whole “I built this” boondoggle during the last presidential election?) When it comes down to it, the US will continue because we really do need each other, whether we are willing to admit it or not. Likewise, there will almost certainly come a time when all the people of the world will need each other more than they despise each other. Then we’ll get the OWG.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2014, 1:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877/54 "2014-06-09T01:29:46Z")

</div>

> [@Fuzzy\_wuzzy](#):
>
> A one world government also takes away healthy competion between States. If one State proves it is well run then that is an encouragement to other States to copy/improve on their own running. A poorly run State also become a warning to other States.

[shrug] We have interstate economic competition within the U.S., but we still have Union.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/f04885/32.png) [@Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qin_Shi_Huangdi)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2014, 6:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877/55 "2014-06-09T06:20:09Z")

</div>

It isn’t bad provided it emerges in a natural manner. I think it ought to start with a union of the developed Western nations which gradually incorporates other countries until a world government isn’t formed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alessan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alessan/32/465_2.png) [@Alessan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alessan)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2014, 7:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877/56 "2014-06-09T07:43:32Z")

</div>

As things stand now, though, there are many, many people around the world who I wouldn’t want to have any power over me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kobal2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kobal2/32/20_2.png) [@Kobal2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kobal2)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2014, 9:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877/57 "2014-06-09T09:32:43Z")

</div>

\*\*Why would a one-world government be bad?

\*\*Because while everybody figures everything would be \*so \*much better if people over there did it like we do down here, nobody down here wants those idiots from over there to have a say in how we do things. Simple as that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mijin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mijin/32/9369_2.png) [@Mijin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mijin)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2014, 10:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877/58 "2014-06-09T10:23:37Z")

</div>

> [@Mirasawa](#):
>
> I can’t imagine the more rascally countries in the world would be fine with a world government telling them to stop starving minorites, circumcizing women, making nuclear bombs, etc.
> 
> In order to have a one-world goverment, that federal governent would have to be willing to go to war with the annoying countries.

True, but with all the world signed up to some kind of global union, there are many more options than war or nothing.

e.g. sanctions could be a much stronger threat with all the world on board. China right now can bully its neighbours because of its relative size. Imagine instead everyone is signed up to a maritime agreement where if you violate another country’s territory, automatic (i.e. no need for a round of voting) sanctions are applied by _all the other world’s nations_.

It’s true beyond that that there are some world leaders who are just nuts and prepared to devastate their own countries just to stay in power. Just as now, if we care sufficiently about that happening, then, yes, we would need to go to war. Although, even then, that doesn’t necessarily entail the need for a federal army.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Clothahump](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/51bf81/32.png) [@Clothahump](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Clothahump)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2014, 5:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877/59 "2014-06-09T17:25:50Z")

</div>

A one-world government is the next logical step in human development. We, as a species, are not yet ready to take that step yet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alessan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alessan/32/465_2.png) [@Alessan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alessan)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2014, 5:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877/60 "2014-06-09T17:33:59Z")

</div>

> [@Mijin](#):
>
> e.g. sanctions could be a much stronger threat with all the world on board. China right now can bully its neighbours because of its relative size. Imagine instead everyone is signed up to a maritime agreement where if you violate another country’s territory, automatic (i.e. no need for a round of voting) sanctions are applied by _all the other world’s nations_.

\*All \*the world’s nations? Really? You think a big, rich country like China wouldn’t be able to find some friends? Chances are, a world government would let China \*annex \*the entire South China Sea and surrounding nations.

In other words, don’t be so sure that this power you’re creating will be used for good.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-would-a-one-world-government-be-bad/272877.md?page=4)
