# Wierdness in old children's books

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [March 7, 2008, 7:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488 "2008-03-07T19:19:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NDP](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ndp/32/55_2.png) [@NDP](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/NDP)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2008, 7:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488/41 "2008-03-08T07:41:59Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=FriarTed]  
I rushed out to grab a Little Golden Book titled “Mister Dog”, the cover of which has him smoking a pipe. Only a matter of time before the Tobacco Gestapo burn that!  
[/QUOTE]

Oh my God, you’re right! [Here’s the cover](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51QQY4JCYCL._AA240_.jpg).

Useless trivia: the cover picture of “Mr. Dog” is a homage by the book’s illustrator, Garth Williams, to [Van Gough’s “Self Portrait.”](http://www.sansior.co.uk/Art/Portraits/van_gough.jpg)

Actually, casual references to tobacco and alcohol in children’s literature were seen as no big deal until fairly recently.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kythereia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/e8c25b/32.png) [@Kythereia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kythereia)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2008, 8:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488/42 "2008-03-08T08:14:42Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=FriarTed]

And I have to admit that my patron saint C.S. Lewis’s portrayal of the Carmoleans (sp?) in my beloved NARNIA is a bit less than progressive. _L_  
[/QUOTE]

Close: Calormenes. 🙂

Roald Dahl is the worst offender this way…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2008, 8:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488/43 "2008-03-08T08:47:04Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=robardin]

_La crème de la weird_ to me, though, was the second book in the Oz series. I loved the movie and read the book, _The Wizard of Oz_, and found to my delight that there was a whole series to follow. I stopped after book #2 because of its “twist ending” worthy of M. Night Shayamalan…

[/QUOTE]

That freaked me out also - not the least because Pip was far more interesting as a character.

In a later book a woman’s suffragette army invades Oz. I think a lot of it was actually social satire. I think not being able to bludgeon kids over the head with it made the books better.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2008, 8:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488/44 "2008-03-08T08:49:33Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=FriarTed]  
I rushed out to grab a Little Golden Book titled “Mister Dog”, the cover of which has him smoking a pipe. Only a matter of time before the Tobacco Gestapo burn that!

[/QUOTE]

They’d have to take our copy of that book from my cold dead hands. Mr. Dog also adopted a boy, (no attempt to contact the parents). Mr. Peabody was not first in this regard.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wendell\_Wagner](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/8491ac/32.png) [@Wendell\_Wagner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wendell_Wagner)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2008, 9:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488/45 "2008-03-08T09:45:01Z")

</div>

Voyager writes:

\> Not just them - Howard Garis and his wife wrote the Bobbsey Twins, Tom Swift,  
\> Uncle Wiggly and a host of others.

The Bobbsey Twins, the Tom Swift, and other books in the series established by the Stratemeyer Syndicate were written by many people. (The Uncle Wiggly books weren’t part of this syndicate and were written just by Garis.) The Wikipedia entry for the syndicate tries to establish which books were written by which people. You’ll need to click the links for the separate series:

> **[Stratemeyer Syndicate](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratemeyer_Syndicate)**
>
> The Stratemeyer Syndicate was a publishing company that produced a number of mystery book series for children, including Nancy Drew, The Hardy Boys, the various Tom Swift series, the Bobbsey Twins, the Rover Boys, and others. They published and contracted the many pseudonymous authors doing the writing of the series from 1899 through 1987, when the syndicate partners sold the company to Simon & Schuster.
> Created by Edward Stratemeyer, the Stratemeyer Syndicate was the first book packager to h...

robardin writes:

\> La crème de la weird to me, though, was the second book in the Oz series.

The Oz books are full of weirdness. That’s what makes them fascinating. In any case, I find all the comments about how weird old children’s books are to be strange in itself. Children love strangeness. Why would someone try to prevent children from growing up not knowing about weirdness?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mobo85](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b19c9b/32.png) [@mobo85](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mobo85)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2008, 9:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488/46 "2008-03-08T21:25:09Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=NDP]  
Actually, casual references to tobacco and alcohol in children’s literature were seen as no big deal until fairly recently.  
[/QUOTE]

That’s because casual references to tobacco and alcohol were seen as no big deal in real life- people smoked and drank a lot back in the old days. Until it was digitally removed a few years ago, the picture of Clement Hurd on the back of _Goodnight Moon_ showed him smoking a cigarette.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zsofia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/7bcc69/32.png) [@Zsofia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zsofia)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2008, 9:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488/47 "2008-03-08T21:41:01Z")

</div>

I love the bit in _George and Martha_ (George and Martha are both hippopatomussess… hippopottami… hipp… more than one hippopotamus) where Martha’s all, “George, damn it, quit looking through the window when I’m taking a bath!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![descamisado](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e480ec/32.png) [@descamisado](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/descamisado)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2008, 9:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488/48 "2008-03-08T21:44:05Z")

</div>

Not really weird per se, but I always thought _Sterling North in Rascal was left alone a little too much_. His mother was dead and it didn’t seem like his father was around all that much. Am I remembering this correctly?

I don’t know if this was bothersome or, since I liked the idea, sort of alluring. Wikipedia describes North’s book is a prose poem to adolescent angst, which is why, when I read it, I thought I might like to try a little solitude and self-sufficiency in the woods too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Farmwoman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/8dc957/32.png) [@Farmwoman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Farmwoman)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2008, 10:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488/49 "2008-03-08T22:47:44Z")

</div>

I prefer the unretouched versions as they make great conversation starters for me and the kids.

My 7 year-old was horrified over the conclusion of a tale in an old book called “The Story Road” where this little pig with a straight tail was forced by her sow of a mother to sit for hours in the hot sun with her mud-soaked tail wrapped around a stick. Poor pig. Evidently she was an embarrassment to her mother and wouldn’t be allowed to go to an apple eating party if her tail wasn’t nice and curly like those of her piggy sisters. All the other barnyard community stopped by to visit and feel sorry for her although no one was in a position to help the mistreated piglet. At the end, she’s delighted with her new curly tail. She struts happily around the apple eating party showing off her classy ass-do.

The moral being: No pain, no gain…mother knows best…whatever. Of course, we were expecting a different moral.

Like I said, my son was horrified. “What kind of mother does that?! Why can’t she just go to the stupid party with her normal tail?!” From which rose the sort of conversation no new age, politically correct kiddie lit (I don’t care how good) will ever induce.

I really resent the current condescending trend toward censorship of classic children’s literature. Even if the parents aren’t as smart as they used to be (due largely to a couple generations on a diet of dumbed down youth literature) the kids are smart enough to note the contrasts between the way things used to be and the way they are now.

The Strong Museum of Play in Rochester New York has an excellent exhibit of children’s literature through the ages and I was struck by the side-by-side excerpts from a Nancy Drew book pre and post re-edit. Granted, the point of this particular part of the exhibit was to illustrate the ‘ahem’ change in the depth and quality of writing for children over the years, but I was alarmed.

This article sums up the 1950 re-edit nicely:

[http://chronicle.augusta.com/stories/020799/fea\_nancydrew.shtml](http://chronicle.augusta.com/stories/020799/fea_nancydrew.shtml)

> [@](#):
>
> In an attempt to appeal to kids with ever-shorter attention spans, Ms. Adams clipped the books from 25 chapters to 20, gutting much of the lengthy, layered language and descriptions that critics claim were central to the books’ charm and uniqueness.
> 
> ``Gone were the leisurely styled, evocative words and phrases that kids savored in the early texts, at a time when entertainment was harder to come by,‘’ Mr. Heiferman and Ms. Kismaric write.
> 
> In the new and ``improved’’ books, action hurtles forward faster than ever, often at the expense of plot detail and character development. Critics complain that the books have become homogenized and dumbed-down for an audience of teens who have something the first generation of Nancy Drew-Hardy Boys readers didn’t: television.
> 
> Ms. Adams also eliminated many of the ethnic stereotypes that plagued popular fiction of the 1930s and '40s.

Great, so in an attempt to treat us like imbeciles they have actually made us into imbeciles.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odesio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odesio/32/20003_2.png) [@Odesio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odesio)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2008, 10:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488/50 "2008-03-08T22:56:59Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Risha]  
I’ve found **Peter Pan** to be very disturbing ever since we did Oedipus in high school English. ☹  
[/QUOTE]

I didn’t find it to be all that disturbing. I do find that the ending of _Peter and Wendy_ was a lot sadder than the Disney production. It was also a bit more violent than other versions of the story I grew accustomed to. The Lost Boys slaughtered all but two of the pirates.

_Treasure Island_ might not be considered weird but it has levels of violence that might be unacceptable to todays audience. When the mutineers led by Silver attacked the stockade on the island Jim Hawkins, who might have been 12 or 13, went out armed with a cutlass with the intent of killing someone. Later he has occasion to utter my favorite phrase from the book.

> [@](#):
>
> “One more step, Mr Hands,” said I, “and I’ll blow your brains out!”

So we’ve got Jim Hawkins wielding two guns John Woo style threating to blow some dudes brains out, and they he kills Mr. Hands. It doesn’t sound all that unusual but it’s only strange because this is a children’s book featuring serious violence, and gun violence at that, done by a pre-teen/teen.

Marc

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f1d935/32.png) [@CC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CC)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2008, 11:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488/51 "2008-03-08T23:25:25Z")

</div>

I can’t believe no one has mentioned _Little Black Sambo_, one of my favorite Little Golden Books from when I was a kid - a stereotypically black boy with brightly colored lips, etc. He gets run in circles around a tree by some hungry tigers and turned into a puddle of butter. I think we’d find that a tad inappropriate today.  
I also find the Grimm stories grim, including The Little Match Girl, who freezes to death. My parents didn’t read that one to me, but I discovered it in later years. Didn’t read it to my kids, either. xo, C.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mobo85](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b19c9b/32.png) [@mobo85](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mobo85)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2008, 11:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488/52 "2008-03-08T23:41:13Z")

</div>

Despite his name, Little Black Sambo lived in India, not Africa. A number of authors have redone the story in a modern setting to remove the racial stereotypes that are attached to the “Sambo” name- for example, [Sam and the Tigers](http://www.amazon.com/Sam-Tigers-Telling-Little-Black/dp/0803720289).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Septima](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/dc4da7/32.png) [@Septima](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Septima)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2008, 12:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488/53 "2008-03-09T00:07:51Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=CC]  
I also find the Grimm stories grim, including The Little Match Girl, who freezes to death. My parents didn’t read that one to me, but I discovered it in later years. Didn’t read it to my kids, either. xo, C.  
[/QUOTE]

The Little Match Girl is most comonly encountered as a H.C. Andersen story, though there may be a Grimm tale that is similar. I loved it as a child. What was wrong with it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peter\_Morris](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/peter_morris/32/359_2.png) [@Peter\_Morris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peter_Morris)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2008, 12:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488/54 "2008-03-09T00:09:45Z")

</div>

Didn’t LBS trick the tigers into running round the tree? And wasn’t it them that turned into butter, not the boy? That’s how I remember it, anyway.

nitpick - The Little Match Girl was written by Hans Anderson.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Baker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/bb73d2/32.png) [@Baker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Baker)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2008, 12:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488/55 "2008-03-09T00:15:45Z")

</div>

In the original _Snow White_, not the Disney version, the wicked queen was featured at the wedding of SW and the prince. She had to dance strapped into red hot metal shoes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tristan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tristan/32/18058_2.png) [@Tristan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tristan)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2008, 12:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488/56 "2008-03-09T00:35:11Z")

</div>

In the original Cinderella, in order to get the glass slipper to fit, the stepsisters cut off their toes and heels (respectively). The Prince is alerted to the deception by a singing bird that tells him to look at floor of the coach, which is getting covered with blood.

I loved that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sublight](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/439d5e/32.png) [@Sublight](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sublight)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2008, 1:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488/57 "2008-03-09T01:00:24Z")

</div>

I tend to raise my eyebrow at the part of _Make Way for Ducklings_ where Mr. Mallard leaves his wife and newborn kids to “go explore up river for a week”. Dude was dipping his beak in another nest somewhere.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![meenie7](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7993a0/32.png) [@meenie7](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/meenie7)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2008, 1:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488/58 "2008-03-09T01:00:26Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Septima]  
The Little Match Girl is most comonly encountered as a H.C. Andersen story, though there may be a Grimm tale that is similar. I loved it as a child. What was wrong with it?  
[/QUOTE]

I can’t speak for CC, but the little girl dies! What’s _not_ wrong with that?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bouv](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/bc8723/32.png) [@bouv](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bouv)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2008, 1:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488/59 "2008-03-09T01:05:11Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Tristan]  
In the original Cinderella, in order to get the glass slipper to fit, the stepsisters cut off their toes and heels (respectively). The Prince is alerted to the deception by a singing bird that tells him to look at floor of the coach, which is getting covered with blood.

I loved that.  
[/QUOTE]

…Cause he couldn’t notice on his own that the uggos were missing portions of their feet? Also, didn’t he look at Cinderellas FACE?! I mean, whether or not they fit in the damn shoe, he could easily see that they looked NOTHING like the girl he danced with.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Terrifel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/c68b51/32.png) [@Terrifel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Terrifel)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2008, 1:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488/60 "2008-03-09T01:07:28Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=CC]  
I can’t believe no one has mentioned _Little Black Sambo_, one of my favorite Little Golden Books from when I was a kid - a stereotypically black boy with brightly colored lips, etc. He gets run in circles around a tree by some hungry tigers and turned into a puddle of butter. I think we’d find that a tad inappropriate today.  
[/QUOTE]  
But… it was the tigers that turned into butter! Wasn’t it?

I’m practically certain it was the tigers that turned into butter.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wierdness-in-old-childrens-books/440488.md?page=4)
