# Will all real creationists please stand up?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [November 29, 2008, 6:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949 "2008-11-29T18:38:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pancakes3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ba9def/32.png) [@pancakes3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pancakes3)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2008, 3:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949/21 "2008-11-30T03:01:17Z")

</div>

Maybe i misspoke, but In terms of concession i meant that i can see how certain people can buy into the creationist myth despite existing scientific evidence. I don’t personally believe in the creationist myth but i can understand how someone with an established faith can use that analogy to justify their position.

I’m asking for other rationales that creationists believe in that may answer questions i have regarding the bible. Maybe it’d help if I listed some things I have problems coming to terms with:

1 - Why did this omnipresent god so favor a minor nomadic sect of people for 3-4000 years before bestowing salvation to the rest of the masses?

2 - Doesn’t the obvious differences between the old testament god and the new testament god bother any of you?

3 - How much of the Bible is actually divinely inspired, and what parts? Why not just make the divinely inspired portions of the Bible - the Bible? Why were other historical accounts rejected for inclusion into the Bible and not the existing historical accounts?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2008, 4:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949/22 "2008-11-30T04:40:44Z")

</div>

_sigh_ Look, just to settle this once and for all, as of this moment, I hereby create the Universe. [This applies retroactively in all respects.](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omphalos_hypothesis)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Locrian](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/locrian/32/14146_2.png) [@Locrian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Locrian)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2008, 4:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949/23 "2008-11-30T04:43:22Z")

</div>

From Pancakes3 - "I’m asking for other rationales that creationists believe in that may answer questions i have regarding the bible. Maybe it’d help if I listed some things I have problems coming to terms with:

1 - Why did this omnipresent god so favor a minor nomadic sect of people for 3-4000 years before bestowing salvation to the rest of the masses?

2 - Doesn’t the obvious differences between the old testament god and the new testament god bother any of you?

3 - How much of the Bible is actually divinely inspired, and what parts? Why not just make the divinely inspired portions of the Bible - the Bible? Why were other historical accounts rejected for inclusion into the Bible and not the existing historical accounts?"

I thought the stories that weren’t included-- Gospel According to Thomas,  
Mary Magdalen-- were enough “proof” that it’s all made up.  
It’s far more easy to picture an adolescent Jesus turning soldiers  
into toads and making a wood piece longer so Joseph  
could complete a carpentry task-- in other words, cheat.

And you’re right, why did this god appear to favor 3,000-4,000  
out of all of his supposed creations? Why kill all of the Iminites?  
Why so mysoginistic?

I still really believe that ignorance is the only fuel  
for creationism. Deny the existence of dinosaurs,  
ice ages, splitting of one major continent into many…  
All these events are never discussed in this bible.  
Why take it as anything but a joke?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ITR\_champion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/c67d28/32.png) [@ITR\_champion](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ITR_champion)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2008, 5:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949/24 "2008-11-30T05:57:54Z")

</div>

> [@pancakes3](#):
>
> I’m asking for other rationales that creationists believe in that may answer questions i have regarding the bible. Maybe it’d help if I listed some things I have problems coming to terms with:
> 
> 1 - Why did this omnipresent god so favor a minor nomadic sect of people for 3-4000 years before bestowing salvation to the rest of the masses?
> 
> 2 - Doesn’t the obvious differences between the old testament god and the new testament god bother any of you?
> 
> 3 - How much of the Bible is actually divinely inspired, and what parts? Why not just make the divinely inspired portions of the Bible - the Bible? Why were other historical accounts rejected for inclusion into the Bible and not the existing historical accounts?

I am not a creationist, but I’ll go ahead and answer these questions anyway.

1. God selected the Israelites for a special role in the history of humankind. Specifically, they were the group of people chosen to prepare the way for the messiah.

2. It did at one time. Then I read the Bible, and discovered that most of the differences that atheists like to complain about do not actually exist.

3. The short answer is that the early church studied the available texts to determine which ones should be considered accurate and which ones should not be. If you want the long answer with all the details about how the decisions were made, an enormous amount has been written on the subject. _Who Made God_, by Ravi Zacharias, has a chapter on that subject for beginners, but as I said, if you want more, there’s plenty more out there.

(I’ll remark in passing that many atheists seem to think they’re dropping a bombshell when they mention the non-canonical gospels. I’ve never read them but I’m certainly aware of them. I’m certain also that anyone who’s been through seminary in a mainstream denomination has read them backwards and forwards and discussed and debated them to death. Those who suggest that the churches are trying to cover anything up there are simply wrong.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Siege](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/dbc845/32.png) [@Siege](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Siege)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2008, 5:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949/25 "2008-11-30T05:59:29Z")

</div>

> [@pancakes3](#):
>
> Maybe i misspoke, but In terms of concession i meant that i can see how certain people can buy into the creationist myth despite existing scientific evidence. I don’t personally believe in the creationist myth but i can understand how someone with an established faith can use that analogy to justify their position.
> 
> I’m asking for other rationales that creationists believe in that may answer questions i have regarding the bible. Maybe it’d help if I listed some things I have problems coming to terms with:
> 
> 1 - Why did this omnipresent god so favor a minor nomadic sect of people for 3-4000 years before bestowing salvation to the rest of the masses?
> 
> 2 - Doesn’t the obvious differences between the old testament god and the new testament god bother any of you?
> 
> 3 - How much of the Bible is actually divinely inspired, and what parts? Why not just make the divinely inspired portions of the Bible - the Bible? Why were other historical accounts rejected for inclusion into the Bible and not the existing historical accounts?

Unfortunately, Young Earth Creationists tend not to last long around here. We get one wandering in once in a while, but they tend not to do well on a board dedicated to fighting ignorance.

As for your third question, you’ll get all kinds of answers to it, ranging from those who’ll tell you non of the Bible is divinely inspired and that it’s all rubbish, to those who’ll tell you every jot and tittle of it is, even the bits where it contradicts itself. We don’t have many of the latter around here either. My answer is, simply, “I don’t know.” There are quite a few fascinating books on the subject, though, and some of our members know quite a bit about how which books would be included was decided.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2008, 1:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949/26 "2008-11-30T13:53:35Z")

</div>

> [@Revenant\_Threshold](#):
>
> Well, I suppose you could if you were truly convinced by that evidence. But you couldn’t hold up both of them at the same time, I think you’re saying - you can’t argue on both fronts simuntaneously whilst honestly claiming them both to be true. Which does make sense.

Yes. In my experience, many creationists primarily argue a young earth, keeping the omphalos argument strictly in reserve for use when challenged by someone who is perhaps a little more familiar with some of the more compelling evidence.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FriarTed](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/friarted/32/1052_2.png) [@FriarTed](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FriarTed)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2008, 2:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949/27 "2008-11-30T14:19:30Z")

</div>

> [@Locrian](#):
>
> I still really believe that ignorance is the only fuel  
> for creationism. Deny the existence of dinosaurs,  
> ice ages, splitting of one major continent into many…  
> All these events are never discussed in this bible.  
> Why take it as anything but a joke?

You’ve never read anything by Young- Earth Creationist leaders or organizations, have you?

They LOVE dinosaurs, and also go for continental breakup, and they find what they take to be references to these in the Bible. As for ice ages, they’ll often work the Great Flood into that. Their main problem is trying to squeeze everything into a 4000 B.C. Creation. Old-Earth Creationists don’t even have that problem. In fact, OECists concede the possibility for lots of evolutionary activity, except that they hold it to be Divinely guided, and believes that it stops short when it comes to the creation of humanity. OECists do believe Adam & Eve to have been specially created. That’s the main point where they differ from Theistic Evolutionists. I myself vascillate between OECism & TEism.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FriarTed](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/friarted/32/1052_2.png) [@FriarTed](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FriarTed)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2008, 2:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949/28 "2008-11-30T14:23:14Z")

</div>

As for the very existence of alternate “Gospels” as evidence that all the Gospels & the rest of the Bible was just made up, so that also must mean that counterfeit money, and even Monopoly money, is evidence that no authentic money exists. Forgeries of Van Gogh and Rembrandt paintings are evidence that no genuine Van Gogh or Rembrandt works exist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![don\_t\_ask](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e68b1a/32.png) [@don\_t\_ask](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/don_t_ask)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2008, 2:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949/29 "2008-11-30T14:32:37Z")

</div>

> [@pancakes3](#):
>
> When Jesus turned water into wine, no amount of scientific analysis of that wine will ever tell you that it was once water. Our best understanding of wine tells us that it has to come from grapes being fermented. We can even go so far as to tell you what kind of grapes the wine was made from, and probably many other details of the wine, but no amount of science will tell you that a carpenter from Nazareth 2000 years ago dipped his fingers into it and presto… wine.

When I was psych nursing many years ago one of the guys I worked with was trying to convince a group of patients that he believed he was Jesus Christ. He did the water into wine bit with potassium permanganate crystals and the patients immediately became his disciples.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FriarTed](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/friarted/32/1052_2.png) [@FriarTed](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FriarTed)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2008, 2:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949/30 "2008-11-30T14:37:27Z")

</div>

> [@don\_t\_ask](#):
>
> When I was psych nursing many years ago one of the guys I worked with was trying to convince a group of patients that he believed he was Jesus Christ. He did the water into wine bit with potassium permanganate crystals and the patients immediately became his disciples.

Yeah, but how did it taste?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Paul\_in\_Qatar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ccd318/32.png) [@Paul\_in\_Qatar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Paul_in_Qatar)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2008, 2:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949/31 "2008-11-30T14:38:07Z")

</div>

I suppose I am a creationist. I believe God created things. Of course I think He did it a very long time ago, perhaps using the Big Bang. If you are talking about the more Biblical sort of creationism, I think the term is “Young Earth Creationism.”

Or something.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Liberal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/848f3c/32.png) [@Liberal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Liberal)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2008, 4:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949/32 "2008-11-30T16:02:14Z")

</div>

> [@Voyager](#):
>
> First, will people stop misusing the term “proof”.

Thank you!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2008, 10:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949/33 "2008-11-30T22:16:52Z")

</div>

> [@pancakes3](#):
>
> I’m asking for other rationales that creationists believe in that may answer questions i have regarding the bible. Maybe it’d help if I listed some things I have problems coming to terms with:
> 
> 1 - Why did this omnipresent god so favor a minor nomadic sect of people for 3-4000 years before bestowing salvation to the rest of the masses?

This shows a basic misunderstanding of a major difference between Judaism and Christianity. Being chosen meant a special relationship with God, some special obligations, and a promise of land and a future. It had nothing to do with salvation. Jews are not saved, and Gentiles are not damned. That was made up by Christians to, as far as I can tell, sell the product.

That’s why Jews don’t try to convert anyone. It isn’t going to make a damn bit of difference in the afterlife, assuming there is one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Liberal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/848f3c/32.png) [@Liberal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Liberal)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2008, 12:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949/34 "2008-12-01T12:18:37Z")

</div>

I would just point out that many Christians do not subscribe to the saved Jews doctrine. In fact, I’d say that few do.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kanicbird](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/5f8ce5/32.png) [@kanicbird](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kanicbird)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2008, 2:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949/35 "2008-12-01T14:03:58Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=DtC]  
It’s up to any man who wants to assert it as fact.  
[/QUOTE]

While this is true, your premise is not. It is not up to man to prove creationism but God Himself. God may work through His servants, as the Holy Spirit, who is God, does dwell among the believers. The way it is usually done is for a person to ask God to prove it, and be open to Him.

> [@](#):
>
> Faith is a dependant variable. It can’t be chosen. It’s not an act of volition. One has to be convinced. Therefore God has the burden to prove himself. It’s ridiculous to demand belief without proof.

It works on 2 levels, God gives faith, but it is also man that requests it. Faith is a gift of God, not a effort of man, and as such does not require man’s effort, nor does it require proof.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kanicbird](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/5f8ce5/32.png) [@kanicbird](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kanicbird)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2008, 2:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949/36 "2008-12-01T14:11:32Z")

</div>

> [@Voyager](#):
>
> First, will people stop misusing the term “proof”. I’ll take massive evidence - which of course exists for both the big bang and evolution.

You learned this through man’s ways, give God’s way a chance.

> [@](#):
>
> Second, you seem to be saying that education is not God’s way. Nothing I learned in Hebrew School supported that notion.

Parents are instructed to raise up their children in the ways of the Lord, and they will not depart from His path. We are instructed to live by faith, not sight. Scriptures point to teaching of the Law (of God), I can’t recall any scriptures about modern schooling except in the case of captured exiles, taught by the conquering kingdoms, such as Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael and Azariah.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mijin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mijin/32/9369_2.png) [@Mijin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mijin)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2008, 2:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949/37 "2008-12-01T14:41:49Z")

</div>

> [@kanicbird](#):
>
> It works on 2 levels, God gives faith, but it is also man that requests it. Faith is a gift of God, not a effort of man, and as such does not require man’s effort, nor does it require proof.

This is a typical sort of argument. So do I understand right, that when I reach the pearly gates, a dialog like this might happen?

**God:** So, Mijin, how come you didn’t believe in me?

**Mijin:** There was no evidence. No good reason to.

**God:** But didn’t you deep down inside _know_ I existed? I put this knowledge / faith inside every person.

**Mijin:** Erm, I guess you didn’t do it strong enough? At a conscious level I was not aware of any such intuition.

**God:** Nonetheless I accept no culpability. To hell with you!

\*\*Mijin: \*\* Doh!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Liberal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/848f3c/32.png) [@Liberal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Liberal)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2008, 3:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949/38 "2008-12-01T15:01:17Z")

</div>

I can’t speak for kanicbird, of course, but I see the dialog going something like this:

**God:** Hi, Mijin!

**Mijin:** Who the hell are you?

**God:** I’m God.

**Mijim:** You can’t be. You’re my hopes and dreams and everything I adore. God is this thing people kept telling me about that I found to be reprehensible.

**God:** Call me anything you like. And welcome.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2008, 3:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949/39 "2008-12-01T15:05:19Z")

</div>

> [@Mijin](#):
>
> This is a typical sort of argument. So do I understand right, that when I reach the pearly gates, a dialog like this might happen?
> 
> **God:** So, Mijin, how come you didn’t believe in me?
> 
> **Mijin:** There was no evidence. No good reason to.
> 
> **God:** But didn’t you deep down inside _know_ I existed? I put this knowledge / faith inside every person.
> 
> **Mijin:** Erm, I guess you didn’t do it strong enough? At a conscious level I was not aware of any such intuition.
> 
> **God:** Nonetheless I accept no culpability. To hell with you!
> 
> \*\*Mijin: \*\* Doh!

While you’re up there, see if you can get Him to explain the Problem of the Rock, and write us a note on your way down.

[QUOTE=FriarTed]  
As for the very existence of alternate “Gospels” as evidence that all the Gospels & the rest of the Bible was just made up, so that also must mean that counterfeit money, and even Monopoly money, is evidence that no authentic money exists. Forgeries of Van Gogh and Rembrandt paintings are evidence that no genuine Van Gogh or Rembrandt works exist.  
[/QUOTE]

While this is a clever analogy, it doesn’t actually hold up. We know that Van Gogh and Rembrandt’s works exist, and we can identify the real ones and the forgeries, because we have experts who study this sort of thing.

We also have experts who study the history of the Bible and other contemporary literature, and they tell us that the _Apocrypha_ and other books rejected for inclusion in the modern Bible were (mostly) written at the same time and from the same perspectives.

The only difference between the books of Esdras or the Gospel of Mary is that Jerome, the Nicene delegates, Luther, Gutenberg and so on didn’t like them. So, who’s to say that one book is “real” and another is not?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CurtC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ce73a5/32.png) [@CurtC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CurtC)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2008, 3:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949/40 "2008-12-01T15:11:33Z")

</div>

> [@kanicbird](#):
>
> It works on 2 levels, God gives faith, but it is also man that requests it. Faith is a gift of God, not a effort of man, and as such does not require man’s effort, nor does it require proof.

So which is it? To get this gift of faith, do we have to make the effort to ask for it, or not? None of that makes sense to me.

And what if we _had_ faith, then realized it was based on nothing but hopes and wishes, so we abandoned it? That situation I think describes what’s happened with most of us here. Did God come in and take back our faith?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-all-real-creationists-please-stand-up/474949.md?page=3)
