# Will Bush be able to regain is lead in the polls?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-bush-be-able-to-regain-is-lead-in-the-polls/245677>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [May 17, 2004, 11:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-bush-be-able-to-regain-is-lead-in-the-polls/245677 "2004-05-17T23:50:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 14\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2004, 2:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-bush-be-able-to-regain-is-lead-in-the-polls/245677/41 "2004-05-24T14:25:04Z")

</div>

I’m looking for takers for a scaled-down version of my landslide bet:

Kerry wins popular vote by \>5% = I win  
Bush wins popular vote by \>5% = you win

Popular vote margin is \<5% = wash  
Change in nominee of either party = wash

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jonathan\_Chance](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jonathan_chance/32/701_2.png) [@Jonathan\_Chance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jonathan_Chance)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2004, 2:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-bush-be-able-to-regain-is-lead-in-the-polls/245677/42 "2004-05-24T14:44:54Z")

</div>

Even I wouldn’t take that one RT.

This sucker is going to be close but I’m still backing Kerry to win the EC narrowly. I think GWB is under too much pressure not to lose some of the swing states.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2004, 3:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-bush-be-able-to-regain-is-lead-in-the-polls/245677/43 "2004-05-24T15:00:11Z")

</div>

> [@BobLibDem](#):
>
> Second most likely scenario: Bush wins by blowout  
> Least likely scenario: Close election.

[That’s the buzz today, anyway.](http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/040524/usnews/24notes.htm)

> [@](#):
>
> But what signs do we watch for (since waiting for Election Day itself is just too, too boring)? On this, Sosnik, a Democrat, and Dowd, a Republican, agree: The best indicator of how an incumbent president will do on Election Day is his approval rating. Two weeks ago, Dowd told U.S. News , “The incumbent president usually gets a vote right at his approval rating. If we are at a 51-52 approval (on Election Day), we will win by 1 or 2 points.” When Dowd uttered those words, Bush had a Gallup approval rating of 52 percent; last week, it fell to 46 percent, the lowest of his presidency. “For an incumbent to be at 46 percent job approval at this point in an election year has historically always spelled defeat” for presidents since 1950, said Frank Newport, editor-in-chief of the Gallup Poll. A Pew Research Center poll released last week showed even lower numbers for Bush, with his approval at just 44 percent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Squink](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b5e925/32.png) [@Squink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Squink)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2004, 3:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-bush-be-able-to-regain-is-lead-in-the-polls/245677/44 "2004-05-24T15:43:25Z")

</div>

[CBS Poll: Bush Ratings Continue Slide](http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/05/24/opinion/polls/main619122.shtml) (May 24)

> [@](#):
>
> Forty-one percent approve of the job he is doing as president, while 52 percent disapprove — the lowest overall job rating of his presidency. Two weeks ago, 44 percent approved. A year ago, two-thirds did.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![braintree](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/8e7dd6/32.png) [@braintree](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/braintree)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2004, 3:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-bush-be-able-to-regain-is-lead-in-the-polls/245677/45 "2004-05-24T15:44:15Z")

</div>

Another thing you guys have to think about is turnout. Lots of Republicans, though still supportive of Bush, aren’t exactly what you would call hot for the guy and grudgingly recognize that, in truth, he really really is a huge fuck-up (I personally consider him our worst president ever). Democrats, on the other hand, are absolutely insane to get rid of him. I have never in my life seen Democrats as united and passionate as they are today. Look for record turnouts among Democrats.

And, Shodan, be sure to put your money where your mouth is. I’d hate to see you miss out on being financially rewarded for having such a perceptive analytical mind.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2004, 3:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-bush-be-able-to-regain-is-lead-in-the-polls/245677/46 "2004-05-24T15:46:46Z")

</div>

> [@RTFirefly](#):
>
> Only if he has something new to say, and even then…37 days until handoff is a little late for announcing who’s getting the ball then.

Not necessarily. As long as Bush gives the average voter the impression that there is a plan in place to handle the transition, he can combat the idea that Iraq is an exitless quagmire. As long as Bush comes up with something more plausible than Kerry’s dropping it on the UN’s doorstep, ringing the doorbell, and running, Bush can make this work to his advantage.

> [@RTFirefly](#):
>
> “The economy” has been recovering for two and a half years. Improvement in the job market will register with most people by whether they and those they know can find work, with what degree of difficulty, and whether or not they’re ‘good’ jobs, or just something to hold things together with until the sorts of jobs they were used to come back. So if we continue to get oodles of new jobs every month (assuming the new jobs we’ve seen in the past two months aren’t largely an [artifact of BLS’ methods for estimating jobs created by new employers not yet included in the Census Bureau’s sampling frame](http://www.bls.gov/web/cesbd.htm)), then you may have a point.

I think the Democrats have been relying on the “net job loss” sound bite pretty heavily. Thus once the job market picks up, they have to come up with something new about the economy that is bad, and not sound like whiners who are going to complain no matter how well things are going. If they can’t manage that perception, it is going to make them appear out of touch with the average undecided voter. “What the heck are they talking about? _I_ got a job. So did my brother-in-law. Must be Bush who did it.”

In other words, Bush is working to take the wind out of the Democratic sails on both their key issues. Iraq? “We are handling that. Here is our plan.” The economy? “It’s getting better because of our tax cuts. Don’t let Kerry screw it up.”

Whether or not you believe the tax cuts caused the recovery, or whether or not Bush’s plan for Iraq is all that much better than Kerry’s, is almost beside the point. Kerry has been talking both issues down; Bush is going to talk both issues up. Politics as usual.

> [@RTFirefly](#):
>
> OTOH, if the spike in energy prices causes the economy to go south again…

Actually, it may be a reason Bush pushes for drilling in ANWAR again. He can say, “See? I told you so.”

> [@RTFirefly](#):
>
> > [@](#):
> >
> > Doesn’t seem to have happened in Reagan-Carter. And remember who won the election in both your examples.
> 
> Reagan-Carter is the defining example, really. They were essentially tied with a week to go. But in the last few days, the undecideds swung sharply to Reagan, giving him a 9-point win in the popular vote.

True. I don’t know what the hell I was talking about. I should have said “Bush-Gore”.

Although I think the surge to Reagan happened for reasons other than just “he is the challenger”. Same for Bush-Dukakis, where Bush Sr. was behind until the GOP convention, or Clinton-Bush, which was closer than a lot of polls predicted. Or Carter-Ford, for that matter. Ford lost because of his Poland remark, and it was still a close election.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![squeegee](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/squeegee/32/14537_2.png) [@squeegee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/squeegee)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2004, 8:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-bush-be-able-to-regain-is-lead-in-the-polls/245677/47 "2004-05-24T20:11:07Z")

</div>

[Bush’s approval rating down to 41% in new poll.](http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/05/24/opinion/polls/main619122.shtml)

Those better be some damned fine speeches George gives in the next couple of weeks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![squeegee](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/squeegee/32/14537_2.png) [@squeegee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/squeegee)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2004, 8:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-bush-be-able-to-regain-is-lead-in-the-polls/245677/48 "2004-05-24T20:14:58Z")

</div>

Oops, I see **Squink** posted the poll numbers first. :o

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nonsuch](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/nonsuch/32/2922_2.png) [@Nonsuch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nonsuch)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2004, 9:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-bush-be-able-to-regain-is-lead-in-the-polls/245677/49 "2004-05-24T21:14:16Z")

</div>

Correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t Bush’s numbers sink further after the last SOTU address? The one about banning gay marriage and going to Mars?

I highly doubt he’s going to get much, if any, bounce from his next few speeches. For one thing, you can’t spin gold out of straw: there’s no getting around the fact that Iraq is a serious mess and that it’s not likely to get better once we “hand it over” (even as we keep 100,000+ troops stationed there). More than that, I think people are wise to the fact that Bush only offers to address the nation when he’s in trouble: his recent public pronouncements have a decided flavor of ass-covering, and he’s no longer able to set the terms of the debate as he once was.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Squink](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b5e925/32.png) [@Squink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Squink)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2004, 9:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-bush-be-able-to-regain-is-lead-in-the-polls/245677/50 "2004-05-24T21:34:23Z")

</div>

> [@Nonsuch](#):
>
> I highly doubt he’s going to get much, if any, bounce from his next few speeches. For one thing, you can’t spin gold out of straw: there’s no getting around the fact that Iraq is a serious mess and that it’s not likely to get better once we “hand it over” (even as we keep 100,000+ troops stationed there).

Don’t forget that once we “hand it over” we can start shovelling blame for whatever happens onto the doorstep of the UN. I don’t think that a four month spin-blitz will be enough to convince many Americans that everything was fine in Iraq until those incompetents at the UN messed it up, but then I was unpleasantly surprised at the percentage of the populace that arrived in Baghdad “pre-fooled” about the reasons for war.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cheddarsnax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/a587f6/32.png) [@cheddarsnax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cheddarsnax)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2004, 9:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-bush-be-able-to-regain-is-lead-in-the-polls/245677/51 "2004-05-24T21:39:39Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> As long as Bush comes up with something more plausible than Kerry’s dropping it on the UN’s doorstep, ringing the doorbell, and running, Bush can make this work to his advantage.

Which is, of course, a misrepresentation of Kerry’s views on Iraq.

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> In other words, Bush is working to take the wind out of the Democratic sails on both their key issues. Iraq? “We are handling that. Here is our plan.”

Will people really believe that? We allegedly had a plan the day we first bombed Baghdad. It’s over a year later, and we’re just coming up with a plan now? Won’t that just serve to highlight the gross incompetence of the Bush administration’s invasion of Iraq? Just because Bush says we’re handling Iraq, doesn’t mean people will believe it. With approval ratings as low as his, people aren’t going to believe something just because he says it.

> [@](#):
>
> The economy? “It’s getting better because of our tax cuts. Don’t let Kerry screw it up.”

Again: Will anyone believe it? Only 23% of Americans believe the economy is getting better. And 60% are concerned that they, or someone in their household, will lose their job within the next year. Those are huge numbers for Bush to overcome, and while there are signs that the economy is recovering, I don’t think it will be enough to convince millions of Americans that Bush’s plan for the economy is working. As for the tax cuts, they’ve had more than enough time to deliver their alleged benefits, but all we have is an economy slowly crawling upward. Indeed, a majority of Americans believe they have had no effect or a negative effect on the economy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![capacitor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e47774/32.png) [@capacitor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/capacitor)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2004, 9:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-bush-be-able-to-regain-is-lead-in-the-polls/245677/52 "2004-05-24T21:51:29Z")

</div>

Here is one way for Bush to regain the lead. It’s simple really:

Replace Rumsfeld with Rudolph Giuliani as Secretary of Defense.

Giuliani already has a reputation of cleaning up a quasi-military force at the same time lowering crime. To many people in the nation, the son of a Mafioso is the quitessential law-and-order man.

And don’t you think that every terrorist in the world will quiver when the one who was mayor of NYC on 9/11 has the tools to enact ultimate revenge?

And Shodan, bush is going to the UN.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![leander](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/bcef8e/32.png) [@leander](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/leander)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2004, 10:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-bush-be-able-to-regain-is-lead-in-the-polls/245677/53 "2004-05-24T22:04:01Z")

</div>

[www.pollingreport.com](http://www.pollingreport.com) is a good place to get poll results, as the site compiles polls from various sources.

For example, [this](http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm) gives you a compilation of Bush’s job rating from FoxNews, CNN, Gallup, Zogby, CBS, Newsweek, etc.

Warning for Republicans: It’s pretty ugly. :eek:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cheddarsnax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/a587f6/32.png) [@cheddarsnax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cheddarsnax)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2004, 11:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-bush-be-able-to-regain-is-lead-in-the-polls/245677/54 "2004-05-24T23:08:32Z")

</div>

More CBS polling data is in, and it’s not looking good. Only twenty-four percent of Americans believe Bush has a clear plan for the planned 6/30 power handover. Sixty percent believe the war was not worth the costs. It’s going to take more than a speech for Bush to overcome these numbers. The big one is this: fifty percent believe our involvement in Iraq was a mistake.

The torture scandal will only continue to hurt Bush. Increasing numbers of Americans believe the Pentagon tried to cover up the scandal, with a majority now believing that to be the case. The number who believe higher-level officials deserve blame is rising (bonus poll fact: among veterans, this number is fifty-seven percent), and Rumsfeld’s approval is now six points lower than his disapproval.

Besides gaining independent voters, Kerry is stealing votes from Bush. Kerry’s support from Democrats is steady, and his support from both independents and Republicans (11%) is rising. Bush, however, has the opposite problem. He’s losing Republican and independent votes, but his Democratic support remains constant. In fact, both Bush and Kerry have equal support from the opposing party.

Then, of course, there’s the election numbers. Bush/Kerry is 41/49. Bush/Kerry/Nader is 41/47/5. The big question: will a respected national poll deliver a sub-40 number for Bush’s approval or re-elect number? When the numbers are that low, it’s hard for even the most optimistic Bush supporter to overlook the polls. Full poll data is [here](http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/05/24/opinion/polls/main619122.shtml).

Can Bush recover? Sure. But it’s going to be tough. The numbers are clearly against him at this point, and they’re only continuing to decline. Personally, I think speculation this far out isn’t worth much, but I’m more than willing to give it a shot.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-bush-be-able-to-regain-is-lead-in-the-polls/245677.md?page=2)
