Will manned space exploration die with the space station?

Look, the cost of keeping people in space is enormous. The idea that people will only support exploration missions if there are people aboard is just nonsense. Especially since unmanned missions are at least an order of magnitude cheaper than manned missions. We’ve had dozens of unmanned missions around the solar system. All for much less than the cost of putting three guys on the surface of Mars. Would it be cool to send human beings to Mars? Sure. And are there science missions on Mars that would be easy for a human to do but extremely hard for a robot to do? Sure. And so what?

As for the contention that we need to get into space to protect our species from extinction via asteroid impact, well, the fact is that it is literally impossible to create a self-sustaining space colony with our current technology. If you really want space colonies, forget about space colonies, we need lots of other things in place first. You’d be better off going to Nigeria and opening a school to teach little girls to read than getting a job at NASA or Boeing.

To create self-sustaining space colonies we need a planet Earth with at least an order of magnitude larger economy. We need to solve the problem that 90% of people born on this planet today have their talents squandered by working on some shithole farm or in some shithole sweatshop factory or some shithole refuge camp.

As for the notion that China or Japan (or Iran!) are on the verge of overtaking us in space, and if you want to visit the moon you better start learning Mandarin now, are just nonsensical. It turns out that getting objects into orbit is really really hard and really really expensive. China’s rapid economic expansion isn’t mysterious, and it isn’t because they’re smarter or better organized. It’s because they started from such a low level after decades of totalitarian communism. It’s like the old joke about the guy who kept hitting himself in the face with a hammer because it felt so good when he stopped. And maybe in a few decades China will achieve the economic milestone of achieving per-capita GDP parity with Mexico. And when they achieve parity with Mexico, their economy will be larger than the United States, because their population is four times larger.

But there are only so many returns you can get from stopping hitting yourself in the face with a hammer. Eventually you reach the stage of other developed countries, and there are no magic formulas beyond that. You can develop out of abject poverty by noticing the way wealthy countries operate and copying them, and noticing the way shithole countries operate and not copying them. But other than acting like a normal country instead of a shithole country, there’s no magic formula. You have to muddle along like America and Europe and Japan do.

And so we need basic science, we need basic education, we need basic human development, we need basic human rights, all over the world, before we can afford repeated trillion dollar stunts like manned missions to Mars. Or we could scrape up the money today, and work like demons for a one-shot mission. We’ll all be glad to pay higher taxes for this, right?

Space travel and space living are interesting survivalist speculations. Eventually some of the adventurers will tire of the game and elect to return to their favorite watering hole on earth. As this might entail large numbers of individuals who would want to accomplish it at the least cost, what would the SouthWest Airlines of return-to-earth look like?
A thought experiment: the returnees are in their decent vehicle in low earth orbit, they fire their retro-drive to achieve sub-orbital velocity, they open a hatch and push out (1) a baseball signed by Harry Caray (2) a note on a single sheet of paper (unfolded or crumpled) signed by Richard Feynman (3) a single goose-down feather from an anonymous goose. Hopefully they remember to close the hatch.
What happens to these three ejected objects?
What kind of cheap re-entry vehicles can you think of based on what happens to these objects?

Here is an opinion piece by a veteran NASA astronaut in favor of bringing China in as a partner in the international space station. Currently, China is the only country on earth with human space launch capability. A snippet:

Thw ISS has been a bust since it was launched. It has not provided any scientific breakthroughs, and it has cost a fortune.
We had best stick with robotic missions, until such time as we develop a workable nuclear propulsion rocket.
Sending astronauts to Mars is simply not worth the cost.
And all the nonsense about “spinoff”-NASA has given the impression that a lot of basic technology which was invented for the space program, has been useful in other areas.
this is simply not true: in fact, much of the stuff invented for NASA has few other applications.
An example: the transistor (and later, the silicon integrated circuit) were invented and perfected with private investment. At the time that Texas Instruments and Fairchild came out with the integrated circuit, the USAF was pumping millions into an entirely obsolete technology-highly miniaturized vacuum tube (“Project Tinkertoy”)-that program blew millions of $, and never resulted in any worthwhile technology.