I’ve been thinking about this over the past few threads on related topics. In general I favor less government interference in the choices of a free society. At some point it comes down to reality vs a principle.
We try to find the proper balance that promotes the greater good. I’m not in favor of a welfare state that encourages generations of economically dependent people and a lack of personal motivation. I’m not in favor of economic policies that encourage attitudes of entitlement. I’m also not in favor of holding so fast to an economic principle that we allow good people to suffer unnecessarily when the economic means is well within our grasp.
Whatever system we put in place will be imperfect. The more of a safety net we provide for the poor the more it will be taken advantage of by a few. It isn’t just the poor who have taken advantage of it. Businesses have made a bundle from providing services to the poor.
The more we cut back on the amount of safety net we provide more people will fall through the cracks and suffer. We can continue to strive for a balance that provides some support while encouraging motivation.
Asking a working family barely getting by to pay the same percentage as a family that has more than enough looks fair according to the numbers but is hardly the same thing in reality.
That’s why we have products at different price points. I don’t know about you, but I don’t buy cars as expensive as the ones he buys - or those stars into cars. There are grocery stores at different price points too. Taxes are different - though maybe we can call the highest bracket “Platinum Class” or something, and people would beg to be in it.
Are you advocating the same dollar amount for the same income, which is communism, or same dollar amount regardless of income, which is absurd?
An average of $17,338 in taxes goes to the feds. You want the guy making $20K a year to pay that?
Your admirable desire for fairness is still resulting in the redistribution of income.
So why is the same absolute percentage fairer than a progressive system, given that the value of money decreases faster than linearly with increasing income?