# Will the next Democratic President have the guts to tear down the Ballroom?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [August 21, 2026, 10:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477 "2026-08-21T22:35:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jebert](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ec9cab/32.png) [@jebert](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jebert)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2026, 10:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477/1 "2026-08-21T22:35:26Z")

</div>

Justice Roberts has given the go-ahead for continued construction of the vanity project ballroom, so any expectation that the full Supreme Court will rule agaionst it is likely unfounded. This would seem to say that a president can do whatever he wants with the White House and its environs. So any succeeding president could order the ballroom to be torn down. A Republican pres wouldn’t do it, but a Democrat could. Does anyone here think that would occur? If it were up to me, it would come down on the first day.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Common\_Tater](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/common_tater/32/13846_2.png) [@Common\_Tater](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Common_Tater)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2026, 10:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477/2 "2026-08-21T22:39:14Z")

</div>

I dunno. Of all the myriad issues facing the U.S.A., White House renovations or denovations are pretty damn far down the list of Shit I Am Really Concerned About.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Happy\_Lendervedder](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/happy_lendervedder/32/8488_2.png) [@Happy\_Lendervedder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Happy_Lendervedder)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2026, 10:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477/3 "2026-08-21T22:46:28Z")

</div>

I hope the next Democratic president purges everything with Trump’s fingerprints on them. Put together a task force to make it happen swiftly and without the president having to waste time on it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joey\_P](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/919ad9/32.png) [@Joey\_P](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Joey_P)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2026, 10:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477/4 "2026-08-21T22:57:04Z")

</div>

> [@Common\_Tater](#):
>
> White House renovations or denovations are pretty damn far down the list of Shit I Am Really Concerned About.

I feel the opposite. Just for the symbolism, I think all Trump’s garbage needs to go. Like toppling the statute of a dictator.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2026, 10:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477/5 "2026-08-21T22:57:29Z")

</div>

> [@Common\_Tater](#):
>
> I dunno. Of all the myriad issues facing the U.S.A., White House renovations or denovations are pretty damn far down the list of Shit I Am Really Concerned About.

Yeah, about 99th out of 100. Big deal- meh. If the new ballroom turns out to be useful, why remove it? Just because trump built it? That is kinda petter and well…trump-like.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Common\_Tater](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/common_tater/32/13846_2.png) [@Common\_Tater](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Common_Tater)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2026, 11:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477/6 "2026-08-21T23:03:38Z")

</div>

Well, OK. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. It just doesn’t move the needle for me. I should think the courts have more important things to worry about as well. It seems really a waste of resources. I think the White House _did_ need a new ballroom or whatever it is. They historically were setting up tents on the lawn for decades now for these receptions, right? Would they have to go back to that in your demolition scenario?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JDYanYan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jdyanyan/32/21663_2.png) [@JDYanYan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JDYanYan)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2026, 11:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477/7 "2026-08-21T23:10:22Z")

</div>

The ballroom, like most other things in this era, point to the need for more ambitious structural reforms, especially of the courts. Dems should be thoughtful which things are worth the political capital of tearing down, but Trump been exploiting a decades long anti-constitutional coup launched by the heritage foundation, and we need to treat it as such.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bobot/32/21622_2.png) [@bobot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobot)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2026, 11:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477/8 "2026-08-21T23:17:11Z")

</div>

If it actually gets built, no Democrat will tear it down out of spite, but will certainly repurpose the space.  
However, if it turns out that the construction was half-assed or inspections were bribed away, that’s another story. Down it goes.  
Or if a natural disaster were to severely damage it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jihi](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jihi/32/17768_2.png) [@Jihi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jihi)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2026, 11:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477/9 "2026-08-21T23:18:03Z")

</div>

> [@Joey\_P](#):
>
> I feel the opposite. Just for the symbolism, I think all Trump’s garbage needs to go. Like toppling the statute of a dictator.

I agree with this. Would tearing down the ballroom be a symbolic? Yes it would be. But symbols matter. This would be no different than blowing up, and tearing down, all of the swastikas in post world WWII Germany.

> [@JDYanYan](#):
>
> The ballroom, like most other things in this era, point to the need for more ambitious structural reforms, especially of the courts. Dems should be thoughtful which things are worth the political capital of tearing down, but Trump been exploiting a decades long anti-constitutional coup launched by the heritage foundation, and we need to treat it as such.

I agree with this as well. I still don’t understand how the hell a president can just snap his fingers and make things like this happen. It may very well be true that the White House should have some sort of ballroom or other facility for official state functions. Welcoming heads of state from other countries etc…

But if that’s the case Trump’s ballroom would still need to be torn down. If a future president and Congress decide that this is a necessity or even a good idea then run it past a Congressional vote and get input from whatever nonpartisan departments deal with these sorts of situations. Trump should not be allowed to simply vandalize Washington DC and we leave all of his spray paint up everywhere like a cosplaying dictator or authoritarian.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2026, 11:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477/10 "2026-08-21T23:26:35Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> Yeah, about 99th out of 100. Big deal- meh. If the new ballroom turns out to be useful, why remove it? Just because trump built it? That is kinda petter and well…trump-like.

The ways Trump things go…

Most likely not torn down, but rebuild it to a more functional building because I do expect that shoddy Trump contractors errors and cut corners will come to light.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![crowmanyclouds](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crowmanyclouds/32/19884_2.png) [@crowmanyclouds](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/crowmanyclouds)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2026, 11:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477/11 "2026-08-21T23:28:54Z")

</div>

> [@bobot](#):
>
> Or if a natural disaster were to severely damage it.

As Donny would tell you, wrecking balls are entirely natural.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PhillyGuy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ed655f/32.png) [@PhillyGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PhillyGuy)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2026, 11:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477/12 "2026-08-21T23:30:15Z")

</div>

> [@jebert](#):
>
> If it were up to me, it would come down on the first day.

This requires an illegal no bid contract and would violate the [Antideficiency Act](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antideficiency_Act). While a lot of Democrats would be fine with the idea that if Trump broke the law, we should break it back, there are a lot of other Democrats and independents who want lawless government to end on the first day of the next Democratic administration. I happen to be one of the latter.

If the Trump ballroom remains incomplete, and the Democrats have even the slightest House majority, and at least 50 Senate seats, it should be possible both politically and legislatively to start over and rebuild something similar to the historical East Wing.

But getting a Democratic president and House and Senate at the same time isn’t all that likely. And doing the job properly takes more time than doing it the Trump way. The Republicans will make hay over that.

I wonder if the best that can be done, in the short to medium run, is to repurpose the ballroom. I suggested before having the D.C. school district use it for events.

Detrumpification would be a real challenge. I do look forward to it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PhillyGuy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ed655f/32.png) [@PhillyGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PhillyGuy)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2026, 11:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477/13 "2026-08-21T23:44:50Z")

</div>

I think this is relevant:

[Le Monde](https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2026/08/21/us-supreme-court-allows-construction-of-trump-s-ballroom-for-now_6756744_4.html?srsltid=AfmBOooa4ykqBU-s1XsUW0m9zriG6dbx74f-Fr_bKJ6LQqsnKs0DvuC7)

> [@](#):
>
> Solicitor General John Sauer, in the appeal to the Supreme Court, also stressed the security aspects of the project and argued that the president has the authority to make changes to the White House. “The President of the United States of America is not a tenant, but rather the sole, elected head of the Executive Branch, and Congress has authorized him to renovate, secure, and protect the White House and its grounds, as other Presidents have been allowed to do, without exception,” Sauer said.
> 
> The project is already 65 percent complete, he said

Emphasis mine.

I strongly suspect the 65 percent is misleading. But if close to true, the ballroom is going to be complete before the next Democratic president takes office. And that president is going to be pledged to stop illegal MAGA spending on vanity projects. Some will say that since the Republicans get away with it, so can we. But that’s one-term thinking.

So it is not a matter of the next Democratic President having guts. It’s a matter of whether the ballroom and arch are complete or not. If incomplete, tear down makes sense. If complete, not so much.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odesio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odesio/32/20003_2.png) [@Odesio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odesio)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2026, 11:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477/14 "2026-08-21T23:53:07Z")

</div>

Donald Trump can’t even put a liner in a pool without screwing it up. I don’t doubt the ballroom or his vanity arch will be constructed with the same competence he’s demonstrated with everything else he’s touched over the years. That said, the Democrats, should they gain power, would best be served by making an honest assessment of the situation as it is and move on from there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kenobi\_65](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kenobi_65/32/13178_2.png) [@kenobi\_65](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kenobi_65)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2026, 5:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477/15 "2026-08-22T05:36:36Z")

</div>

> [@bobot](#):
>
> If it actually gets built, no Democrat will tear it down out of spite, but will certainly repurpose the space.

What would be brilliant is that a Democratic president names the ballroom after Obama or Biden.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![scudsucker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/scudsucker/32/14101_2.png) [@scudsucker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/scudsucker)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2026, 6:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477/16 "2026-08-22T06:19:39Z")

</div>

I’ve seen footage of Obama dancing, but not Biden. So my vote goes to Barack, but because I’ve also seen Michelle dancing, the “Michelle and Barack Obama Ballroom” sounds fitting.

I have even seen Trump jerkily wave his arms around, but twitching to YMCA is not the style I’d expect in a ballroom.

Compare and contrast:

[![](https://img.youtube.com/vi/rRYaVIs4iVI/maxresdefault.jpg "{HD/720P} Barack & Michelle Obama First Dance HIGH DEFINITION 720P Neighborhood Ball") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRYaVIs4iVI)

(4 min, 5 seconds)

[![](https://img.youtube.com/vi/zg7vNdAC4zc/maxresdefault.jpg "Hilarious Trump Dancing Compilation") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zg7vNdAC4zc)

(Mercifully, just 24 seconds)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smapti](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/smapti/32/17938_2.png) [@Smapti](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Smapti)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2026, 6:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477/17 "2026-08-22T06:27:41Z")

</div>

I doubt there’s going to be any significant progress made on it in the next two years.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chad\_Sudan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chad_sudan/32/4509_2.png) [@Chad\_Sudan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chad_Sudan)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2026, 7:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477/18 "2026-08-22T07:10:35Z")

</div>

The ballroom should be repurposed as the HQ of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2026, 9:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477/19 "2026-08-22T09:04:04Z")

</div>

If the ballroom is structurally sound, it would be way pettier (and probably lead to more voter backlash) to tear it down than to just rename it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spoons](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spoons/32/3141_2.png) [@Spoons](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spoons)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2026, 9:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477/20 "2026-08-22T09:32:45Z")

</div>

If the ballroom is structurally sound (I’d have my doubts), then carve it up into offices and conference spaces. Given that the First Lady’s traditional East Wing offices are gone, let the ballroom be hers to do with as she wishes.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-the-next-democratic-president-have-the-guts-to-tear-down-the-ballroom/1032477.md?page=2)
