# Will Voyager 1 ever find its way in the Smithsonian?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [December 7, 2011, 11:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425 "2011-12-07T23:05:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Candyman74](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ad7895/32.png) [@Candyman74](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Candyman74)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2011, 7:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425/41 "2011-12-08T19:08:06Z")

</div>

> [@whc.03grady](#):
>
> You’re going to bet on the Sears Tower being here in the year 298,000 AD? Over a couple ~6 foot probes that will be floating through, for all practical purposes, _nothing_ for tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, or millions of years?

It doesn’t have to be the same building. Any building built in 298,000 AD will do.

How long till the Sun dies? That’s when all signs of human civilization (on earth) will disappear. And I fully disagree with the poster above who claims that in all that time it is extremely unlikely that we’ll have colonized outside our solar system. I can’t see how we wouldn’t have by then. The time scales are immense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![whc.03grady](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/a6a055/32.png) [@whc.03grady](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/whc.03grady)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2011, 7:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425/42 "2011-12-08T19:30:50Z")

</div>

> [@Candyman74](#):
>
> It doesn’t have to be the same building. Any building built in 298,000 AD will do.

Good point.

However, if _Homo sapiens_ has a lifespan on par with other mammals (and there’s really no reason to think we don’t), the species has about 800,000 years left in it. So the last building built by the last person will have to manage another 1.2 million years of exposure after _her_ death to outlast Pioneer 10.

> [@Candyman74](#):
>
> I can’t see how we wouldn’t have by then.

You can’t? Here’s a scenario: mankind is destroyed by forces within before the technology for interstellar space travel is developed. Here’s another: mankind is destroyed by forces without before the technology for interstellar space travel is developed.  
Seems pretty easy to imagine to me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Candyman74](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ad7895/32.png) [@Candyman74](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Candyman74)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2011, 7:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425/43 "2011-12-08T19:42:41Z")

</div>

> [@whc.03grady](#):
>
> You can’t? Here’s a scenario: mankind is destroyed by forces within before the technology for interstellar space travel is developed. Here’s another: mankind is destroyed by forces without before the technology for interstellar space travel is developed.  
> Seems pretty easy to imagine to me.

OK; if you insist, I’ll rephrase and remove the colloquialism.

I think there’s a good chance mankind won’t be wiped out completely and will develop insterstellar travel before 298,999AD. That gives it 297,000 years to do so. Though why we’re limiting it to that short a time, I’m not sure. When will the sun die? We have about 5\* billion\* years to do it in. That’s our hard time limit.

We might have setbacks. Even near extinction a thousand times over, forcing us to start again each time, and we could still do it before our 5 billion years is up.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shagnasty](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9dc877/32.png) [@Shagnasty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shagnasty)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2011, 7:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425/44 "2011-12-08T19:52:45Z")

</div>

> [@Candyman74](#):
>
> We might have setbacks. Even near extinction a thousand times over, forcing us to start again each time, and we could still do it before our 5 billion years is up.

All it takes is one full extinction for it to be game over for humanity. 5 billion years is a long time as you say and there is plenty of time for one really bad event to happen to end the whole thing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Candyman74](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ad7895/32.png) [@Candyman74](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Candyman74)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2011, 8:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425/45 "2011-12-08T20:14:16Z")

</div>

> [@Shagnasty](#):
>
> All it takes is one full extinction for it to be game over for humanity. 5 billion years is a long time as you say and there is plenty of time for one really bad event to happen to end the whole thing.

The key there is “full” extinction.

Sure. I wouldn’t for a moment say it’s not possible. But we’re a lot cleverer than dinosaurs. We have a better chance of continuing, even if we’re reduced to a handful a few times. And if we eventually colonize nearby bodies - even minimally - those odds get even better. As long as we can start again, we’re still here.

None of us know, of course. We’re all guessing here, and some are more optimistic than others. But I think we have a decent chance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sco3tt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/45deac/32.png) [@sco3tt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sco3tt)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2011, 8:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425/46 "2011-12-08T20:46:39Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Man\_In\_Black](#):
>
> You are assuming the second ship would have the extra room for the members of the first crew and the supplies needed for them all to get there. I guess you could say they should think about that when building the second ship though.

Not to mention that ship 3 needs to accommodate both 1 & 2, #4 would need space for the preceding 3, ad infinitum. It’s going to get crowded out there.

As far as Voyager’s return: I think it’s far more likely some alien race will stumble upon it in transit, monitor its trajectory to determine its source, and return it to us as a gift of intergalactic goodwill. Then eat us.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2011, 9:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425/47 "2011-12-08T21:01:26Z")

</div>

A new ship would also have to match velocities to pick up earlier-launched stragglers. Which means slowing down significantly and then speeding up again. Which, in space, is generally very expensive, and an interstellar ship won’t be able to afford very large margins. We’d need a truly revolutionary propulsion system to make it practical to pick up stragglers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alka\_Seltzer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/c89c15/32.png) [@Alka\_Seltzer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alka_Seltzer)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2011, 9:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425/48 "2011-12-08T21:47:41Z")

</div>

> [@Quartz](#):
>
> Have any of the probes reached galactic escape velocity? If not, won’t they return in about 150M years?

I don’t think so, I beleive they just have a slightly different orbit around the galaxy than the sun. As such, the chance of them ever encountering the solar system is close to zero. Space is very, very big.

> [@whc.03grady](#):
>
> Of course, by a long shot.  
> There are all kinds of forces on Earth–weather, plate tectonics, rust, erosion, artillery–that conspire in one way or another to make short work of everything we make, not just buildings. The oldest known man-made structures are no more than 6,000 years old.

Yes, geological time can easily destroy mountains. If we died out tomorrow, visible remains of our structures wouldn’t last long, we’d soon be a subject for archeology. This is especially true anywhere cold enough to freeze water, which gets into cracks and expands. Think what a single bad winter does to our roads. A few decades of neglect would probably be enough to reduce a city like New York or London to rubble.

> [@whc.03grady](#):
>
> The Pioneers, Voyagers, and others we’ve sent out on the other hand face none of these challenges. They get hit by micrometeorites once in a while but as they get further away from a star (_e.g._, the Sun) and all its attendant debris they’ll come into contact with fewer and fewer objects of appreciable size. Even radiation–which doesn’t exactly _destroy_ them in any case–will be less of a factor.

The interstellar wind would also erode them over time. Does anyone have an estimate of how long they would last?

> [@Candyman74](#):
>
> How long till the Sun dies? That’s when all signs of human civilization (on earth) will disappear. And I fully disagree with the poster above who claims that in all that time it is extremely unlikely that we’ll have colonized outside our solar system. I can’t see how we wouldn’t have by then. The time scales are immense.

The distances are also immense. There is nothing inevitable about us eventually colonising the galaxy. The technical and political barriers may simply be too great to overcome. I tend to think in terms of energy budget, a key question is whether we will face an energy rich or energy poor future compared to today. I might start a thread in GD to discuss this further.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Candyman74](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ad7895/32.png) [@Candyman74](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Candyman74)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2011, 9:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425/49 "2011-12-08T21:49:12Z")

</div>

> [@Alka\_Seltzer](#):
>
> The distances are also immense. There is nothing inevitable about us eventually colonising the galaxy. The technical and political barriers may simply be too great to overcome. I tend to think in terms of energy budget, a key question is whether we will face an energy rich or energy poor future compared to today. I might start a thread in GD to discuss this further.

Nobody said it was inevitable. I was arguing that it wasn’t impossible.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alka\_Seltzer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/c89c15/32.png) [@Alka\_Seltzer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alka_Seltzer)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2011, 9:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425/50 "2011-12-08T21:54:27Z")

</div>

Sorry, but that’s not what you seem to be saying here (bolded).

> [@Candyman74](#):
>
> And I fully disagree with the poster above who claims that in all that time it is extremely unlikely that we’ll have colonized outside our solar system. **I can’t see how we wouldn’t have by then.** The time scales are immense.

I find it an interesting subject to think about. I’ll start to think we have a decent shot when we’ve demonstrated the ability to build a self-sustaining artificial environment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dracoi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/90db22/32.png) [@dracoi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dracoi)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2011, 11:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425/51 "2011-12-08T23:13:26Z")

</div>

> [@sco3tt](#):
>
> As far as Voyager’s return: I think it’s far more likely some alien race will stumble upon it in transit, monitor its trajectory to determine its source, and return it to us as a gift of intergalactic goodwill. Then eat us.

I would really, really doubt that. Once it goes silent, you’d have to be virtually on top of it to see it. Even with alien sensors made of unobtanium. 🙂

Given the scales involved, it’s a little like saying “I dropped a baseball in the Sahara. Some day, someone will find it.” Actually, that’s probably a bad analogy. I’m sure baseballs lost in the Sahara are more like Jupiters lost in interstellar space.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Senegoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/senegoid/32/6606_2.png) [@Senegoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Senegoid)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2011, 11:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425/52 "2011-12-08T23:17:20Z")

</div>

> [@Candyman74](#):
>
> We might have setbacks. Even near extinction a thousand times over, forcing us to start again each time, and we could still do it before our 5 billion years is up.

Or maybe not. I read somewhere some years ago (sorry, no cite) the notion that if mankind got itself bombed back to the stone age, we would never again be able to rebuild civilization like we did the first time – the obstacle being that we’ve already consumed far too much of the planet’s non-sufficiently-renewable resources for that. (But I don’t recall that the source mentioned specifically what those depleted resources are, other than maybe petroleum ETA: or other fossil fuels in general. Agricultural resources maybe also.) (Does anybody else here know of this theory?)

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> A new ship would also have to match velocities to pick up earlier-launched stragglers. Which means slowing down significantly and then speeding up again. Which, in space, is generally very expensive, and an interstellar ship won’t be able to afford very large margins. We’d need a truly revolutionary propulsion system to make it practical to pick up stragglers.

We’ll just beam the aboard, Scotty! 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Senegoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/senegoid/32/6606_2.png) [@Senegoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Senegoid)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2011, 11:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425/53 "2011-12-08T23:22:24Z")

</div>

> [@dracoi](#):
>
> I would really, really doubt that. Once it goes silent, you’d have to be virtually on top of it to see it. Even with alien sensors made of unobtanium. 🙂
> 
> Given the scales involved, it’s a little like saying “I dropped a baseball in the Sahara. Some day, someone will find it.” Actually, that’s probably a bad analogy. I’m sure baseballs lost in the Sahara are more like Jupiters lost in interstellar space.

If you dropped a baseball into the ocean (someplace not too terribly deep, though), dolphins will find it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Candyman74](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ad7895/32.png) [@Candyman74](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Candyman74)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2011, 11:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425/54 "2011-12-08T23:29:29Z")

</div>

> [@Alka\_Seltzer](#):
>
> Sorry, but that’s not what you seem to be saying here (bolded).

I’m glad you’re sorry; and indeed that your grasp on my position is greater than mine, despite my later clarification. If you scroll down a few posts from the one you quoted, you’ll see said clarification.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![whc.03grady](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/a6a055/32.png) [@whc.03grady](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/whc.03grady)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2011, 11:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425/55 "2011-12-08T23:36:42Z")

</div>

> [@Alka\_Seltzer](#):
>
> The interstellar wind would also erode them over time. Does anyone have an estimate of how long they would last?

interstellar=no wind  
I don’t know that stellar winds do anything to these probes anyway. Wreck the instruments, yes. But the actual vehicle itself? Nah. I’ve seen nothing that implies they’ll ever be destroyed other than by hurtling into something really big, or something really hot. Neither type of thing is on any of their paths for the near future, if at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Canadjun](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/76d3ee/32.png) [@Canadjun](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Canadjun)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2011, 11:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425/56 "2011-12-08T23:38:17Z")

</div>

> [@Francis\_Vaughan](#):
>
> The idea is hardly new. My memory is failing me on this, but I remember reading a SciFi story over 30 years ago that featured a group of vanguard explorers (on their way to a star whilst in suspended animation) that were overtaken when about half way to their destination by a now vastly more advance human race that made the journey almost as a regular commute. The main story was more about dealing with culture shock, but as I said, the idea isn’t new. My feeling about the story was that it was not a recent writing when I read it.

There may be more stories with a similar theme, but one is “On the Shoulders of Giants” by Robert J. Sawyer. The original crew took 1200 years to get to their destination, finding out when they arrived that it was well populated by sixth generation descendants of the first people that arrived at the planet in question (those first people having left long after the original crew). Ultimately the original crew decided that it was pointless staying with all those descendents of people that had come after them, got their hands on a new spaceship and headed off to the Andromeda galaxy. The story is copyright 2000. I guess that’s not 30 years ago, but like I said, there may be similar themes.

ETA Oops - I see others have mentioned older stories.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Icerigger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/icerigger/32/432_2.png) [@Icerigger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Icerigger)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2011, 12:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425/57 "2011-12-09T00:30:56Z")

</div>

Don’t forget the Voyagers have music and pictures and a recording of Ann Druyan’s brain waves so a sliver of human thought will last virtually forever.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shagnasty](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9dc877/32.png) [@Shagnasty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shagnasty)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2011, 12:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425/58 "2011-12-09T00:36:57Z")

</div>

The original claim was that the space probes would be the last traces around from human civilization because the Earth would be destroyed. The Earth isn’t going to be destroyed at least in a total sense. That isn’t really conceivable in the next few hundred million years if not many times longer. It is true that you can point to anything you can see now and chances are it won’t be around in 200 years let alone 2000 or 2,000,000 years but oddities happen.

Archaeology and paleontology wouldn’t exist if some improbable series of events didn’t make it possible to find remains of things thousands, millions, or hundreds of millions of years old even today right under our feet. The total volume of those that survive on Earth no matter what else happens will still be greater than a couple of space probes and much more discoverable by alien scientists wondering what happened to us someday.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2011, 1:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425/59 "2011-12-09T01:26:22Z")

</div>

The Earth and all that’s left on it _will_ be destroyed in about 5 billion years, though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dtilque](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/d6d6ee/32.png) [@dtilque](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dtilque)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2011, 3:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425/60 "2011-12-09T03:17:37Z")

</div>

Besides the Pioneer and Voyager spacecraft, there’s also New Horizons and its third stage that are on separate trajectories to leave the Solar System. I’m fairly sure those 6 items are the only ones on escape trajectories.

Cosmic rays will embrittle their metal and UV radiation should degrade any exposed plastic. After enough time, they should be rather fragile so an encounter with a small dust grain may be all it takes to destroy them.

By the way, how can they be said to have left the Solar System when they haven’t even reached the semi-major axis (519 AU), much less the aphelion (937 AU) of Sedna? Doesn’t that planetoid count as part of the System?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/will-voyager-1-ever-find-its-way-in-the-smithsonian/605425.md?page=4)
